Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
The AAR and Mississippi navigation (was: "comedy act....")
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="Datafever"]Futuremodal, are you implying that commerce/industry should not be held accountable for environmental damages?<br />[/quote]</p><p>No, I'm saying *environmental damage* from such things as dredging or lock maintenance is non-existent. An EIS is required for virtually every project that might dip into a waterway. One of the local barge ports up here had to abandon plans for a new small riverside dock due to costs associated with the EIS requirements. The way the law is written, river users must prove beyond a reasonable doubt (at their expense) that water-borne development activities won't harm the environment, rather than forcing the eco-nuts to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that it will (and at the eco-nuts expense). Ergo, a lot of unrealistic draconian fantasies are brought to the table as *possibillities* that must be discounted on each point.</p><p>It is somewhat ironic, since private fishing boats will spill noticable amounts of fuel into a river from single stroke engines, yet the possibility that USACE maintenance dredging might stir up a little mud is cause for a full scale panic.</p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy