Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Midwest High Speed Rail
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote user="nanaimo73"]<p>AntiGates-</p><p>Which do you think would get more riders from Fort Wayne, a 79 mph train on the CFW&E to Chicago (2.5 hrs?), or 79 mph through Muncie to Indianapolis (2 hrs?)?</p><p>[/quote]</p><p>Probably the Indy route, but I don't think that route could sustain itself.</p><p>I recall reading in Trains Mag a while back, that in order for new passenger corridors to "work", endpoints are key. You have to have an attractive destination at either end of the project, to get the traffic necessary to support the route. with the points in between being secondary. And that made a lot of sense to me.</p><p> </p><p>Endpoints such as Chicago-New York, Los Angeles-Las Vegas, etc</p><p> </p><p>Chicago-Cleveland probably isn't good enough, nor is Chicago-Columbus</p><p> </p><p> Fort Wayne is NOT a real destination. And I don't think that Detroit-Indianapolis (with Ft Wayne as a point in between) could draw the patronage needed to make it work, either.</p><p> </p><p><span class="smiley">[2c]</span> </p><p> </p><p> </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy