Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
The AAR and Mississippi navigation (was: "comedy act....")
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote user="spokyone"][quote user="futuremodal"][quote user="Datafever"][quote user="futuremodal"] <p>The problem is the allegation made by Mr. White that, without subsidies, barging would be more expensive than railroading. If you take away all forms of subsidies from both modes, the fact remains that barging is a lower operating cost method of transit, and that usually results in lower costs to the end users.</p><p>[/quote]</p><p>I would presume that barges have to pays fees for each lock that they traverse</p><p>[/quote]</p><p>Barge companies pay into a Waterway Trust Fund, from which the federal government gets another deficit buffer. Currently, barge companies pay more into the fund than what they are getting out if it.</p><p>[/quote]</p><p>FM Is this money collected on a fuel tax for all commercial vessels?</p><p>[/quote]</p><p>I don't know if it's a fuel tax or just a user fee. There was a 4.3 cent per gallon tax both barge lines and railroads paid a few years ago for deficit reduction, but that was eliminated.</p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy