Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

making real looking water.

17470 views
29 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: Sturgis South Dakota
  • 169 posts
making real looking water.
Posted by froggy on Wednesday, September 24, 2008 6:27 PM
I recently added onto my layout and now have two DC trains running and two DCC trains running.I have twqo bridges and they go over a small creek.I was wondering what you guys have tried to use to make water look real.Is there a home recipe or should a person get it from the LHS?
  • Member since
    April 2008
  • From: Columbia, Pa.
  • 1,592 posts
Posted by Grampys Trains on Wednesday, September 24, 2008 8:35 PM

Hi froggy: There are many products you could use to make realistic water. I believe most modelers use some form of commercial product. This is an example of one of them, Magic Water.

 

 

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,481 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Thursday, September 25, 2008 8:14 AM

I'm still new at this myself, but the key is not the material, but rather the preparation and painting of the "stream bed" before you pour the fake water.  This is my only on-layout experiment with water.  It's a small piece of flat styrene, with the surface painted using cheap acrylics to simulate a variation of depth, using light-to-dark coloration.  There is a single thin coat of Envirotex on this.

Envirotex is a 2-part epoxy, which you can buy at art supply stores and maybe home-improvement or hardware places, too.  It's designed for bars and counter tops where you want a shiny, hard, clear surface.  Like I said, though, I'm new at this.

The posts I've read recently about the Woodland Scenics water product have not been very positive, by the way.  I guess I would avoid that.  They also make a "water effects" product for waterfalls and rapids that seems to produce good results from the pictures I've seen.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • 1,089 posts
Posted by BlueHillsCPR on Thursday, September 25, 2008 9:00 AM

Check out Joe Fugate's Scenery Clinic.  Go to page four and scroll to the last post, that's where the making water starts.

Also do a search for "water" in the layout building forum and in General Discussion, you will find lots of information. 

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Thursday, September 25, 2008 1:49 PM

I've had good success using a flat surface and acrylic paint and acrylic gloss finish. I usually first paint the stream area a dark color like black or dark blue. Then after that dries I make the stream area a little wet with water, then sort of put "leopard spot" splotches of different shades of blue (and/or green or brown, depending on the area you're modelling) paint on the dark surface. Then before it's dried I take a larger brush (1" or larger) and gently pull it along the area in the direction of the flow of water of the stream. That blends things together and makes it look more like water. After that's dried, I cover it all with a coat or two of acrylic gloss medium. Gloss medium is firm enough you can brush in small ripples in the water for nice effects.

I like it because it's all water-based acrylics, no nasty odors or fumes to worry about. Dead [xx(]

Stix
  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: THE FAR, FAR REACHES OF THE WILD, WILD WEST!
  • 3,672 posts
Posted by R. T. POTEET on Thursday, September 25, 2008 2:03 PM

I had not looked at Joe Fugate's Scenery Clinic before today but let me say this: Joe, you and I may have some exceptions regarding operations but your modeling techniques are second to none!

I have used acrylic gloss medium as well as Envirotex for creating water; if I am modeling (relatively) still water I use acrylic gloss medium--I use Envirotex if modeling moving water. I don't really recommend it but I have tried casting resin but, believe me, you had better make sure that things are sealed up properly or your watercourse will transfer itself to your floor.

The essential thing for good water is to insure that you have adequately prepared your beneath-the-surface details prior to pouring your water making material. If you get everything done and don't like the way things look it can be a monster to tear out and start all over again. BEEN THERE! DONE THAT! BOUGHT A T-SHIRT!

From the far, far reaches of the wild, wild west I am: rtpoteet

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Canada, eh?
  • 13,375 posts
Posted by doctorwayne on Thursday, September 25, 2008 6:51 PM

Grampy and MisterB, nice looking water effects. Wink [;)]

Check HERE for an alternative method - all of the pictures show my first efforts, so the process is pretty simple.  You'll need to scroll down a bit for an explanation of the procedure.

Wayne

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • 947 posts
Posted by HHPATH56 on Friday, September 26, 2008 7:06 AM

Hi Froggy                                                                                                                        For excellent help with creating realistic water go to "woodlandscenics.com" Click on the Woodland Scenics (blue ad to the right).  Click on woodland scenics "How to Videos". Then click on "Using Realistic Water"  This is an excellent sound video.  Also, go to Joe Fugate's Video series.  I use Magic Water for my cascading rivers. which applied in thin layers along with Woodland Scenics "Water Effects"  produces realistic fast moving water models. You never make the water actually 2 inches deep. Most rivers are made only 1/8" to 1/4" deep. The bottom color preparation gives the illusion of depth. For large harbors, I have used transluscent plastic ceiling light panels (with a raised random relief pattern). I painted the smooth bottom side with the usual blending of sand colored edges to nearly blue-green-black center.  These sheets can be cut to shape and fit tightly together on their edges.     Bob Hahn

 

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: Sturgis South Dakota
  • 169 posts
Posted by froggy on Friday, September 26, 2008 8:36 AM
I like all the pictures and the ways to do it.My river is about 2" deep, do you think it should had been more shallow and then finish the surface with fake water?I could build it up with plaster.I think I built a great layout but I do need help with certain scenery.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,481 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Friday, September 26, 2008 9:27 AM

 froggy wrote:
I like all the pictures and the ways to do it.My river is about 2" deep, do you think it should had been more shallow and then finish the surface with fake water?I could build it up with plaster.I think I built a great layout but I do need help with certain scenery.

When it comes to water, we're all in the same boat.  We all need to get our feet wet the first time, so I'm glad you asked this.  I'm at almost the same point - putting in my first significant water effect, and I don't feel any more confident than you do.

As for the deep river, check out the Joe Fugate link above.  He's got quite a deep river there, right up to the edge of his layout.  It came out very well.  You should be OK with that depth, as long as you do a big number of thin pours rather than a small number of thick ones.  Yeah, it will take time, but since when has doing anything fast ever payed off in this hobby?

The only thing I'd give some thought to is:  how much river do you have?  Envirotex isn't cheap stuff, so you might want to figure out what it will take to fill that 2-inch deep river.  A small stretch might be fine, but if your river is 5 inches wide and extends for several feet, it's going to take a lot to fill it.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: Sturgis South Dakota
  • 169 posts
Posted by froggy on Friday, September 26, 2008 1:34 PM
My river as I see it is about 8" long and it's on the back edge of the layout with two bridges going across it.It shouldn't take alot of stuff to make the water.Anyone have any ideas for a road that would go across the river from one side to the other for vehicle traffic?
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,481 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Friday, September 26, 2008 5:19 PM

That's actually what I'm doing right now.  This is the small road bridge over the stream which feeds the Mill Pond:

That was a few days ago.  Yesterday I coated the plaster cloth with Gypsolite, and today I painted the surface.   I tinted the Gypsolite brown before I applied it, so that was the starting point.  I made progressive washes of black, blue-black, and blue-green, finally finishing with an olive green wash for the above-water stuff.  I also added some small rock castings, talus and real sand.  Here's what it looks like right now:

I made the bridge last week.  I have a Woodland Scenics tunnel portal, but I found it was too thick for most places I wanted to use it, and too tall for my subway portals.  So, a couple of years ago I made a mold from latex rubber of just the front face.  Since I already had the mold, it was quick work to make up a couple more portal faces from Hydrocal, which became the outside edges of the bridge.  I used another rock wall casting, this one from Dave Frary, for the inner edges of the walls, facing the roadway.  The road comes up a bit on foam scraps.  Once the water is all poured, I'll use Durhams Water Putty for the road surface.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,481 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Monday, October 6, 2008 7:03 AM

Thought you'd like to see the finished product.  This is a bit more close-up, but I liked the "artiness" of this photo:

This is a view from the other side:

After I painted the bottom of the stream and pond, I did 4 pours of Envirotex.  With thanks to Joe Fugate for his clinic, I tinted each batch just slightly.  The first was with blue and black, the second blue, and the third and fourth used a light olive green called "Foliage."  Each of these was done with just a drop or so of cheap acrylic craft paint.  This little bit of paint was not really visible, but it kept the Envirotex from having that "clear as glass" look, so that the bottom of the stream/pond got less and less distinct the deeper you look.

After the pours were complete and the Envirotex set up hard, I did notice the "edge creep" that people talked about.  I got rid of most of it with turf and ground foam around the edges.  The stone bridge was a problem, because the Hydrocal seemed to wick up some of the Envirotex, and the wet look extended quite a ways up.  So, I added the tall grass to hide it.

The swans are from Preiser.  There are some ducks and geese in the package too.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Canada, eh?
  • 13,375 posts
Posted by doctorwayne on Monday, October 6, 2008 8:53 AM

Looks great, MisterB. Smile,Wink, & Grin [swg]

Wayne

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Brisbane, Australia
  • 784 posts
Posted by mikelhh on Monday, October 6, 2008 5:33 PM

 Mr B you seem to have misunderstood the thread topic - it's how to MAKE real looking water, not how to use real water! Wink [;)] Thumbs Up [tup]

 

 Mike

Modelling the UK in 00, and New England - MEC, B&M, D&H and Guilford - in H0

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Monday, October 6, 2008 6:26 PM

Nice finished product, Mr. B. Smile [:)]  I would be very proud of that.

-Crandell

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • 745 posts
Posted by HarryHotspur on Saturday, October 25, 2008 7:20 PM

 Looks terrific Mr. B. How deep did you pour each layer?

- Harry

- Harry

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,481 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Saturday, October 25, 2008 9:50 PM

HarryHotspur

 Looks terrific Mr. B. How deep did you pour each layer?

- Harry

The bottom layer was about a quarter-inch.  The rest of them were an eighth of an inch or less.  I think the big thing was the Joe Fugate tutorial's suggestion about coloring the mix.  For the bottom layer, I used a bit of blue and a bit of black, just a pinhead of each in a couple of ounces of Envirotex.  The next layer was blue and green, and the upper layers were just green, and less of it.  I think this adds just enough opacity to each layer that the "clear as glass" look goes away, and as you get deeper and deeper, the image is fuzzier and fuzzier, like real water would be.

Before I did this, I played around with some test pours.  First, I found that if you put an inch of Envirotex into a "pond" all at once, it will end up full of bubbles.  I also discovered that I don't have the skill to paint a very shallow pond base so that it looks like it's deep.  I had much better luck using real depth, and painting that to enhance the effect, rather than trying to create it entirely with paint.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • 745 posts
Posted by HarryHotspur on Sunday, October 26, 2008 1:14 AM

 Good info, Mr. B. Thanks.

- Harry

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • From: Traverse City, MI
  • 266 posts
Posted by camaro on Monday, October 27, 2008 7:22 AM

Froggy,

 I believe I had the web address spelled incorrectly. Check out Lance Mindheims "Voodoo and Palmettos" East Rail Layout.   Lance does an excellent job modeling water in a canal that is only 1/8" deep.

 

Larry

www.lancemindheim.com

 

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Carmichael, CA
  • 8,055 posts
Posted by twhite on Monday, October 27, 2008 11:27 AM

Mr. B--

Where were you when I was pouring Bullard's Bar Lake 5 years ago, LOL?   That's just a beautiful water effect.  Great work!

Tom Bow

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,481 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Monday, October 27, 2008 12:11 PM

Since this thread has re-surfaced, I thought I'd add the third section of the stream.  This was done a couple of weeks later.

I really didn't change much in technique here.  The area was a bit larger, and I think it looked better once I closed it in a bit with trees.

What I'd like everyone else to take away from this is that this is my first try with water.  There is nothing magical about doing it.  You don't have to be an artist.  It's nothing more than plaster, paint and patience to go along with the Envirotex.  Ducks don't hurt, either.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Eastern Panhandle of West Virginia
  • 245 posts
Posted by chessiecat on Monday, October 27, 2008 5:21 PM

Mister Beasley could you tell me who made those great looking ducks and swans that you have in your scene? Great scene by the way! 

Thanks Jim

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,481 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Monday, October 27, 2008 7:09 PM

Ducks, geese and swans are all from the same package by Preiser:

http://www.walthers.com/exec/productinfo/590-14167

I've had these for a long time, and when I pulled them out to put them in place, I'd completely forgotten about the swans.  So, I was pretty happy with them.  To me, the waterfowl are the icing on the cake, the last touch that brings the scene to life.  Thanks for taking the time to bring them up.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • From: Traverse City, MI
  • 266 posts
Posted by camaro on Tuesday, October 28, 2008 8:49 AM

Froggy,

 I believe I had the web address spelled incorrectly. Check out Lance Mindheims "Voodoo and Palmettos" East Rail Layout.   Lance does an excellent job modeling water in a canal that is only 1/8" deep.

 

Larry

www.lancemindheim.com

 

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Portland, OR
  • 3,119 posts
Posted by jfugate on Tuesday, October 28, 2008 10:06 AM

R. T. POTEET
I had not looked at Joe Fugate's Scenery Clinic before today but let me say this: Joe, you and I may have some exceptions regarding operations but your modeling techniques are second to none!

 

Thanks, R.T.

I just noticed this post, so sorry if I'm a little slow in catching your comments.

When it comes to scenery, I'm a fanatic for realism - so I'm glad to hear you think I've been successful.

I like acrylic Gloss medium for large bodies of water like a wide flat river, a large pond, or a lake. For small streams in a V shaped bed, envirotex is good. However, envirotex sets up mirror smooth - which is not typical for most bodies of water, so adding a layer of ripples on top using acrylic gloss medium really sets it off nicely.

And finally, make sure you paint over any envirotex creep around rocks and the edges of your stream with some flat dirt color. 

Do the ripples and painting over the creep and you'll take your envirotex water to the next level!

Joe Fugate Modeling the 1980s SP Siskiyou Line in southern Oregon

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,481 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Tuesday, October 28, 2008 10:33 AM

I'm still struggling with the ripples.  I tried using a bit of Modge-Podge, but it really just flattened out and didn't give me the effect I'm looking for.  It was, however, an old bottle of Modge-Podge I found among my wife's art supplies, and I'm not sure if this stuff has a shelf life.

Does acrylic gloss medium stand up by itself better than Modge-Podge?  How do these compare to Woodland Scenics Water Effects?

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: Phoenixville, PA
  • 3,495 posts
Posted by nbrodar on Tuesday, October 28, 2008 11:33 AM

 Mr. B you might want to try acrylic gloss GEL or clear caulk instead of acrylic gloss MEDIUM (ie Modge-Podge).

There are several techinques shown here:

The mill pond water is a painted base with several (I lost count) layers of acrylic gloss medium.  The rapids and stream under the outfall are a clear sealent called Lexel.

Again here we have a painted base above and below, with vertical beads of Lexel for the falls:

Finally, we have a stream with a detailed bottom and several pours of WS Realistic Water.  If I did it again though, I would use Envirotex.  It took a month for the WS stuff to fully set clear, and reasonably hard.

Nick

Take a Ride on the Reading with the: Reading Company Technical & Historical Society http://www.readingrailroad.org/

  • Member since
    April 2008
  • From: Columbia, Pa.
  • 1,592 posts
Posted by Grampys Trains on Tuesday, October 28, 2008 1:04 PM

 Hi Mr.B: This is Magic Water with WS Water Effects.

 

 

  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Wayne County Michigan
  • 678 posts
Posted by dale8chevyss on Tuesday, October 28, 2008 1:22 PM

 I agree- the Envirotex Lite is a great way to go- it turned out really well on my model pond. 

Modeling the N&W freelanced at the height of their steam era in HO.

 Daniel G.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!