General Discussion

The place to discuss railroad industry trends, information about freight railroads, train watching, comments on recent trips, and other railroad topics. If you're new here, please read our forum policies.

Last post 07-10-2009 1:07 PM by tleary01. 62 replies.
Rate:
Sort Posts:
Page 4 of 5 (63 items) < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next >
07-08-2009 5:02 PM In reply to
Offline CShaveRR
Top 25 Contributor
Joined on 06-27-2001
Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
Posts 8,854

Re: Train vs. Tornado

They just showed the last portion of this video on the local news. No explanation except that this is "what happens when a train and a tornado collide." They got the location correct.
07-08-2009 7:11 PM In reply to
Offline bubbajustin
Top 500 Contributor
Joined on 01-28-2009
Down Yunder' by the Norfolk Southern
Posts 1,304

Re: Train vs. Tornado

zardoz:

bubbajustin:
One thing sure is for sure, someone from a higher power was watching over that train that day.

If 'someone' was truly watching over the train, wouldn't 'they' have caused the tornado to go away, or cause the train be delayed so as to not have been there at all during the tornado, or perhaps had the train going faster so it would pass the area before the tornado, or perhaps .....etc.......

And to answer your railroad question: correct. The EOT will indicate both air pressure as well as motion (or lack thereof).

Well, some things I just can't answer... Nevertheless of the diffrence of thought, don't you agree that it's a good thing that that hopper was in the way? I mean, it would have just plowed into the locomotive. Sure, the hopper did too, but it was coupled.

07-08-2009 9:49 PM In reply to
Offline DennisHeld
Not Ranked
Joined on 03-15-2003
Champaign, IL
Posts 140

Re: Train vs. Tornado

richg1998:

Here is a little follow up.

Here's a YouTube of the actual tornado, but not near the Lawrence train scene. BTW, they just showed the YouTube of the derailment of WGN, Chicago on the news.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YSKv4KZlrA

07-08-2009 10:13 PM In reply to
Offline jeaton
Top 50 Contributor
Joined on 09-09-2002
SE WI
Posts 4,498

Re: Train vs. Tornado

DennisHeld:
richg1998:

Here is a little follow up.

Here's a YouTube of the actual tornado, but not near the Lawrence train scene. BTW, they just showed the YouTube of the derailment of WGN, Chicago on the news.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YSKv4KZlrA

 

07-08-2009 11:56 PM In reply to
Offline WSOR 3801
Top 500 Contributor
Joined on 12-06-2004
WSOR Northern Div.
Posts 1,168

Re: Train vs. Tornado

zardoz:

WSOR 3801:
the PCS cuts the power when the air goes.   

Is that feature still operational these days? Many years ago there were many discussions on the old CNW regarding the desireability of this feature.  It was concluded that having it active is a really bad idea; consequently, the PCS was disabled on our locomotives.

 

Every engine I've been on has it functional.  Even UP engines on rock trains, and the ones WSOR bought at the UP scrap sales.  One of our customers had a SW1 that seemed to predate the PCS feature.  They would try to drag around empty boxcars that were dumped.  Many other things they would do out there.  

07-09-2009 1:14 AM In reply to
Offline DennisHeld
Not Ranked
Joined on 03-15-2003
Champaign, IL
Posts 140

Re: Train vs. Tornado

jeaton:

DennisHeld:
richg1998:

Here is a little follow up.

Here's a YouTube of the actual tornado, but not near the Lawrence train scene. BTW, they just showed the YouTube of the derailment of WGN, Chicago on the news.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YSKv4KZlrA

 

Thanks for activating my link. The Harvard tornado shown was just after passing Lawrence. Harvard is my hometown and i grew up 2 miles north of the tornado's path. My mother lives in a house that was 2 miles south of the tornado. The police cruiser seen by the overturned semi was driven by my nephew, a Harvard policeman. He was pulled from the semi scene to help with the hazmat evacuation at the Lawrence derailment. The storm chasers had the highway wrong. Highway 23 doesn't go north of Harvard. They were actually on highway 14.

07-09-2009 8:04 AM In reply to
Offline zardoz
Top 75 Contributor
Joined on 01-31-2003
Kenosha, WI
Posts 4,331

Re: Train vs. Tornado

bubbajustin:
Well, some things I just can't answer...
There are many things mortal man cannot (yet) answer; but it does one's soul good to just contemplate the questions.

bubbajustin:
don't you agree that it's a good thing that that hopper was in the way?
Yes, I do agree that it was fortunate that the hopper was in the way of the locomotives.

07-09-2009 8:09 AM In reply to
Offline zardoz
Top 75 Contributor
Joined on 01-31-2003
Kenosha, WI
Posts 4,331

Re: Train vs. Tornado

WSOR 3801:

zardoz:

WSOR 3801:
the PCS cuts the power when the air goes.   

Is that feature still operational these days? Many years ago there were many discussions on the old CNW regarding the desireability of this feature.  It was concluded that having it active is a really bad idea; consequently, the PCS was disabled on our locomotives.

 

Every engine I've been on has it functional.  Even UP engines on rock trains, and the ones WSOR bought at the UP scrap sales.  One of our customers had a SW1 that seemed to predate the PCS feature.  They would try to drag around empty boxcars that were dumped.  Many other things they would do out there.  

Well, it has been many years since I was running; they must have had a change of philosophy.  Back then the thinking was that the risk of the rear of a train running into the front part after a separation was more of a safety risk than whatever safety reason anyone could come up with for having the PCS active.
07-09-2009 8:58 AM In reply to
Offline jeffhergert
Top 500 Contributor
Joined on 03-26-2003
Central Iowa
Posts 1,231

Re: Train vs. Tornado

If the emergency is initiated back in the train, many UP engines now have a 20 second delay before losing power when the PCS opens.

Jeff 

07-09-2009 4:02 PM In reply to
Offline Kootenay Central
Not Ranked
Joined on 08-20-2005
Posts 316

Re: Train vs. Tornado

The senior Engineers 6 decades ago said that they could put a steam engine on a freight train into emergency from the brake stand for, say, a truck at a crossing, which then cleared, and go back to Release, then Running, and carry on as before with no stop.

K3 Brakes were much more common then, and trains shorter in the mountains.

With Diesels and 24RL equipments, most Engineers would block down the bail ring on the Independant to keep the locomotive brakes unapplied from the Automatic, but, still answering the independant handle.

A dire thought is of the rest of the train, a la that tank car in the video, catching up with several thousand tons.

Apparently, in the glory days of steam, a train stalled in a long tunnel amidst the sound of the exhaust and the smoke filling the cab.

The Engineer, hunched in his seat with the window closed against the fumes, never shut off, and noticed nothing awry until the Conductor, who had walked up from the Caboose tapped him on the shoulder wondering why they had stopped in the tunnel.

The drivers had cut down to the ties, so they say.

Some crews bled compressed air into the cab, the compressor intakes below the running boards.

07-09-2009 8:16 PM In reply to
Offline zardoz
Top 75 Contributor
Joined on 01-31-2003
Kenosha, WI
Posts 4,331

Re: Train vs. Tornado

Kootenay Central:

The senior Engineers 6 decades ago said that they could put a steam engine on a freight train into emergency from the brake stand for, say, a truck at a crossing, which then cleared, and go back to Release, then Running, and carry on as before with no stop.

You can also do that with 24RL brake valves.  As recently as only 3 decades ago CNW's E8s and F7s had 24RL brakes (before the locomotives were rebuilt for Metra with 26L brake valves).

Some of the 24RL brake valves had a 'full release' feature on the opposite side of the 'emergency' portion.  This feature would put 'straight air' directly into the trainline, causing a much faster release; however there was always a danger of overcharging the trainline by doing this, as main drum pressure (~130psi) was sent through.

07-09-2009 9:52 PM In reply to
Offline Deggesty
Top 200 Contributor
Joined on 08-22-2005
Near the Crossroads of the West
Posts 1,937

Re: Train vs. Tornado

Kootenay Central:

Apparently, in the glory days of steam, a train stalled in a long tunnel amidst the sound of the exhaust and the smoke filling the cab.

The Engineer, hunched in his seat with the window closed against the fumes, never shut off, and noticed nothing awry until the Conductor, who had walked up from the Caboose tapped him on the shoulder wondering why they had stopped in the tunnel.

The drivers had cut down to the ties, so they say.

There is also the story of a stalled freight in the first Cascade Tunnel. After some time of running, the headend crew thought that they should have long been out into the open (fixed speed)--and when they stopped and got down, they found that the drivers had ground through the head down into the web.

I have often wondered: just how do you get the engine and train out? Jack sufficient wheels up to give working room, remove the damaged rails, and put new rails in?

Johnny

07-09-2009 10:44 PM In reply to
Offline Awesome!
Top 500 Contributor
Joined on 03-08-2008
Austin, TX
Posts 821

Re: Train vs. Tornado

trainfan1221:

 I didn't get a clear impression the train was trying to stop, only that it definitely ran into something.  A tornado that close might not be all that visible, also it might have run into it just forming. Either way, the engine seemed to remain intact, at least until the rest of the train came running after it.

I thought the US Weather Service would have giving the warning to the R.R. and able to stop the train. Like everyone say's "January". oh boy!

07-09-2009 11:45 PM In reply to
Offline DennisHeld
Not Ranked
Joined on 03-15-2003
Champaign, IL
Posts 140

Re: Train vs. Tornado

Awesome!:

trainfan1221:

 I didn't get a clear impression the train was trying to stop, only that it definitely ran into something.  A tornado that close might not be all that visible, also it might have run into it just forming. Either way, the engine seemed to remain intact, at least until the rest of the train came running after it.

I thought the US Weather Service would have giving the warning to the R.R. and able to stop the train. Like everyone say's "January". oh boy!

<

Even though the tornado was on the ground in Poplar Grove, IL (15 miles to the SW) the sirens didn't sound in Harvard until the tornado had passed. So, residents didn't get a warning. But a January tornado in northern IL is extremely rare.

07-10-2009 2:11 AM In reply to
Offline frankodragon
Not Ranked
Joined on 04-17-2006
Posts 21

Re: Train vs. Tornado

How many cars are required to be separated between a tanker car carrying haz material and the locomotive(s) when strung together?  I thought six was the minimum although I seen only maybe 5 cars between the locomotives-it was hard to see or maybe the tanker WAS the 6th car.  Maybe they should up that to 8 after that tanker sliding.
Page 4 of 5 (63 items) < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next >
Copyright © 2009 TRAINS.COM
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems
Subscriber and Member Login
E-mail Address:
Password:
Remember me
My Profile
Screenname: (get your screenname)
Search Community
in