General Discussion

The place to discuss railroad industry trends, information about freight railroads, train watching, comments on recent trips, and other railroad topics. If you're new here, please read our forum policies.

Last post 06-14-2009 3:31 PM by CShaveRR. 2 replies.
Rate:
Sort Posts:
Page 1 of 1 (3 items)
06-13-2009 9:00 PM
Offline mlehman
Not Ranked
Joined on 09-04-2003
Posts 738

Algoma Central Track Conditions

 I saw a recent Trains news item about the Algoma Central that track conditions resulted in the Ontario government slapping a speed restriction on the northern 1/3 of the line. from Hawk Junction north to Hearst, freight trains will be restricted to 10 mph and passenger to 15 mph.  That's a really long speed restriction, so I'm curious if others know more about this?

I also ask because I rode the train from the Soo to Hearst on honeymoon with my wife on May 18 & 19. Admittedly, there are a couple of spots that do require a top speed of 10 mph on the passenger. One particularly bad stretch was a brief section that would feel really adventurous at 15 mph. There's some pretty significant rolling back and forth there. 

On the other hand, much of this stretch is hardly call for 15, where it was quite passable for large stretches at 30 mph. Other parts of it call for lesser speeds, but more than 15 mph is quite doable. There are several lengthy stretches over lakes that are part causeway, part trestle, but the train rode through these smoothly at a good clip. The crew seems to know well what they need to do, so they must have some specific track orders.

Perhaps this is the government's way to tell CN that the stretch needs work.  Perhaps putting the slow order in  place is meant to raise the priority of maintenance for CN?

 Now to the good stuff...

The crew is very accommodating to railfans. Our conductor was a gracious host, the radio was right there in the coach with us, and everything was clean and inviting. There's lots of good photo ops. The multiple stops at cabins and lakes are scenes to take in, along with interesting conversation with passengers.

 Going to -- or from -- Hearst? You'll be one of the few. The closest hotel has an entrance on the track side and to the road side. You'll be close by, there a nice little pub/restaurant in it. But it was Victoria Day, so no food service, although drinks were available. We ordered pizza -- it was great. Hearst is 96% French-speaking, but you can get by just fine in English.

 Next morning, breakfast at the motel, then on the train. Saw my first Ontario Northland units, but couldn't get a photo...

The way back takes a little longer than going up. The flag stops are part of it, because they're never sure who'll flag them down. Going up, they rarely board passengers and they know who's getting off where. So the hit the 12-hour limit aboput 20 miles north of the Soo. Taxi time and a new crew.

The catch is that it'll be harder to put  a new crew on going north.

The "Tour of the Line," as it's called, is a great, if not fancy, railroad experience. Take it now and help keep the passenger count up.

Mike

 

06-14-2009 12:34 PM In reply to
Offline al-in-chgo
Top 150 Contributor
Joined on 10-23-2006
Chicago, Ill.
Posts 2,717

Re: Algoma Central Track Conditions

Has CN been practicing "deferred maintenance" since they acquired the line? 

06-14-2009 3:31 PM In reply to
Offline CShaveRR
Top 25 Contributor
Joined on 06-27-2001
Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
Posts 8,828

Re: Algoma Central Track Conditions

al-in-chgo:

Has CN been practicing "deferred maintenance" since they acquired the line? 

I think the answer to that one is rather obvious--if speed is going down because of deteriorating track conditions, the track is being undermaintained. The question then becomes, is the maintenance being deferred or withheld? I think the scenario is possibly that things will get so bad that the track can't be improved without starting over from the ballast (or lower) up, Then, of course, it will not be worth the expense, and will be left to rot, particularly after passenger movements are banned.

Just because the entire track has been slapped with this limit doesn't mean that there aren't some stretches that would be all right for higher speeds--they're just so few and far between that it wouldn't be practical to single them out. When I first hired out on the C&NW, timetable speed for freight trains on our line to Clinton was 50 m.p.h.--with a train order further restricting freights to 40 over the entire subdivision (compare to mostly 70 nowadays). On my first road trip, we were headed west (40 seemed smooth enough, but it was monotonous), and we got to one stretch not far from Sterling, where the conductor said to me, "Feel how smooth that ride is--it all used to be this way, and the streamliners could take this track at 100." Within a couple of miles, though, it was back to the swing and sway. And, of course, there were slower spots singled out by train orders--and usually one could see disturbed earth near those spots where wrecks had been cleared. And this was at a time when C&NW still had passenger service of its own to Clinton (Trains 1 and 2--vestiges of the Kate Shelley 400).
Page 1 of 1 (3 items)
Copyright © 2009 TRAINS.COM
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems
Subscriber and Member Login
E-mail Address:
Password:
Remember me
My Profile
Screenname: (get your screenname)
Search Community
in