Locomotives

The power that moves the nation’s freight and passenger trains every day. Find out about new locomotives, the fate of old favorites, and ask experts about locomotive performance. If you're new here, please read our forum policies.

Last post 07-05-2009 1:19 PM by carnej1. 38 replies.
Rate:
Sort Posts:
Page 2 of 3 (39 items) < Previous 1 2 3 Next >
05-17-2009 9:48 PM In reply to
Offline upjake
Not Ranked
Joined on 11-29-2008
Posts 61

Re: Fs

That is what makes it so nice that these tourist trains and museums have repainted and preserved some F units. For me and I would bet even many non-train fans the 'covered wagons' bring up fond memories of the past. The 'RJ Corman' FP7s are great. Oh just one other question. As railroads bumped up to newer diesels in the 60s, was it ever sometimes common for some Fs to be kept for yard switching or other light work?
05-18-2009 6:39 AM In reply to
Offline CSSHEGEWISCH
Top 50 Contributor
Joined on 12-21-2001
Burbank IL (near Clearing)
Posts 5,197

Re: Fs

upjake:
That is what makes it so nice that these tourist trains and museums have repainted and preserved some F units. For me and I would bet even many non-train fans the 'covered wagons' bring up fond memories of the past. The 'RJ Corman' FP7s are great. Oh just one other question. As railroads bumped up to newer diesels in the 60s, was it ever sometimes common for some Fs to be kept for yard switching or other light work?

What to do with its old F units led Santa Fe to begin rebuilding them into CF7's beginning with 2649 in 1970.  Santa Fe was in an unusual situation since its road fleet had a higher percentage of F units than most other Class 1's and trading them in on GP38's to work local freights was not viewed at the time as a smart financial move. 

 

05-18-2009 8:02 AM In reply to
Offline AlienKing
Not Ranked
Joined on 04-11-2008
Posts 45

Re: Fs

The Escanaba and Lake Superior still uses an F unit in freight service. It hasn't been repainted from its WSOR colors.

http://tr.youtube.com/watch?v=iMCFnUBBbcY

05-18-2009 11:58 AM In reply to
Offline carnej1
Top 500 Contributor
Joined on 11-28-2003
Rhode Island
Posts 873

Re: Fs

bubbajustin:

carnej1:

mudchicken:

Iowa Northern has 2 F40's in almost every day use.

But does an F40PH count as an "F unit"? After all it's a Cowled roadswitcher frame not a "covered wagon"...

I would count that as an F. A bit boxeir on the front end, but that's ok. I here that it is real hard to see backward out of the locomotives. Especially with 2 or three cabless booster's trailing behind.

 Not a problem with an F40 as there are no B units, it's a GP40-2 wearing a streamlined cowl after all...

05-18-2009 4:20 PM In reply to
Offline bubbajustin
Top 500 Contributor
Joined on 01-28-2009
Down Yunder' by the Norfolk Southern
Posts 1,140

Re: Fs

CSSHEGEWISCH:

  Metro-North may have some FL9's and ex-C&NW F7A's in service on some branches on the New Haven line and as relief power.

Aren't the FL9's getting phased out by those new locomotives that look like a cross between an SD45, and a GP40? Ummmmmm..... Ohhhh What are thay called.... ummm... Built by Brookville Equipment Corporaton... Well, I can't think of the name... BL102 maby...no defanatley not that. That's the crummy locomotive nobody lliked before the Geep. Well I can't think of it. 

05-18-2009 7:55 PM In reply to
Offline trainfan1221
Top 150 Contributor
Joined on 07-24-2003
Elmwood Park, NJ
Posts 2,352

Re: Fs

 Escapes me too, but the FL9s were phased out by the dual service Genesis units.

05-19-2009 4:07 AM In reply to
Offline pajrr
Not Ranked
Joined on 08-03-2004
Posts 72

Re: Fs

The new Brookville locomotives on Metro-North are BL20GH, 2000 hp roadswitchers
05-22-2009 4:06 PM In reply to
Offline trainfan1221
Top 150 Contributor
Joined on 07-24-2003
Elmwood Park, NJ
Posts 2,352

Re: Fs

Thanks for the info.  I should have known that...

05-22-2009 9:09 PM In reply to
Offline oltmannd
Top 50 Contributor
Joined on 01-17-2001
Atlanta
Posts 4,384

Re: Fs

The Southern RR of NJ has a couple of F units that would occasionally make the trip from Salem to Swedesboro NJ.  Don't know if they've run recently - might just be sitting in the weeds in Salem.

05-26-2009 7:37 PM In reply to
Offline LNER4472
Not Ranked
Joined on 01-08-2001
US
Posts 36

Re: Fs

 One that at last report still is:  The Gettysburg Northern out of Gettysburg, Pa. with two F-units.

05-26-2009 8:02 PM In reply to
Offline g&gfan
Not Ranked
Joined on 03-28-2009
Posts 5

Re: Fs

Goderich-Exeter used to run ex-CN FP9A's in service with their geeps but the F units are out of commission right now. This is according the Canadian railfans bible, the Canadian Trackside Guide 2009. The F's, nos. 1400 and 1401, were originally brought to the GEXR to power the snowploughs. The Locomotive special issue of 2007 covered their snowplough operation.  

05-26-2009 9:26 PM In reply to
Offline dredmann
Not Ranked
Joined on 07-13-2006
Posts 147

Re: Fs

I would not call Norfolk Southern business trains tourist operations, and of course NS has its F-units (A-B-B-A) for such trains. They run pretty regularly.

 

In a similar vein, there is an IC (still painted IC, I think, not CN) E-8 that pulls business trains.

 

05-26-2009 11:04 PM In reply to
Offline Alan Robinson
Not Ranked
Joined on 01-03-2008
Asheville, North Carolina
Posts 61

Re: Fs

The original F units (and E units for that matter) were almost all purchased by major railroads in the late forties and fifties. There were good reasons for this. The new road diesels were expensive and the majors were the ones with the money and cash flow to pay for them. Diesel technology developed pretty fast during those early years and by the time the F9 and E8 came along these units were quite efficient at moving freight and passengers in over the road operations. But they made horrible switchers due to the poor visibility, especially to the rear. Even an A-B-B-A lashup was a pain for switching operations but it did help avoid the hassle of turning the power at the end of a run. But once the road switcher design came into fashion the railroads had a locomotive that could do it all, freight, passenger and switching.

It was not easy to convert an E or F unit into a road switcher because the body structure that shrouded the internal components provided structural support, unlike the heavy frame of a road switcher. Only the Santa Fe and a very few other roads tried it. So, as these units aged they weren't very useful to move down to branchline service because they made such problematic switchers. Similarly, selling the units to short lines or branch lines had limited appeal. By the time these lines could afford diesels (even used ones) they wanted road switchers or units like GE's 44 tonner rather than old F units from the major roads.

Thus, trade-in programs became immensely popular. The GP7 was essentially the guts of an F7 in a roadswitcher car body as was the GP9 the guts of an F9 in a similar body. So it was no trouble for GM to take these units as trade-ins, overhaul the prime mover, electrical gear, trucks and traction motors and end up with essentially a new much more useful unit at a fraction of the cost of a conventional new unit.

Will we ever see similar "covered wagon" designs regain popularity? Only in long haul passenger or freight service and then the cowl will probably be non structural as in the F40 unit and its derivatives, or the new units built for Amtrak. Making the cowl nonstructural simply makes maintenance so much easier that there are few reasons not to build units that way.

Still, there is something about a brace of covered wagons in a snappy paint job that the newer units just can't match in appearance, especially when pulling a string of lightweight cars from the age of the streamliners. Such beautiful trains. The new Superliners pale in comparison.

05-26-2009 11:45 PM In reply to
Offline challenger3980
Top 500 Contributor
Joined on 03-18-2007
Portland, OR
Posts 989

Re: Fs

   I would have to try and find the info for these pics to give an exact date, but it was about a year and a half ago, that I spotted this F unit ( 9, I believe). It was stopped just outside of Moscow, ID almost on the Washington border.

   Needless to say the Black Widow paint caught my eye, it has MRLX reporting marks, which as I recall, are for Rail America (Not Montana Rail Link). When I did some research, I found that this was an ex-Via Rail unit, if my memory still serves me well. Still working in Revenue service, earning her keep.

   Edit: It is a Mid America Rail Car Leasing unit, not Rail America. I also was able find a little more info, this unit was originally built for CN, then went to Via.


Doug

05-27-2009 1:07 AM In reply to
Offline Tom Moran
Not Ranked
Joined on 02-10-2005
Posts 11

Re: Fs

Cape May Seashore Lines, operator of the former Pennsylvania-Reading

Seashore Lines 'Cape May Branch' in Cape May County, NJ has on lease

from The United Railroad Historical Society, two ex- C&NW F7s. They

were painted and correctly numbered to resemble Lehigh Valley units.

They alternate with an original PRR GP9, that has been perfectly

restored to its 'as delivered' condition. It is still numbered 7000, the same

number it had on 'day one' with the Pennsylvania Railroad. Throughout its life, the number has

remained 7000.

I'm surprised the Reading Technical & Historical Society hasn't 'jumped in' with their original,

mint condition Reading FP7s. They also have one awaiting (?) restoration.

jckid1934

Page 2 of 3 (39 items) < Previous 1 2 3 Next >
Copyright © 2009 TRAINS.COM
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems
Subscriber and Member Login
E-mail Address:
Password:
Remember me
My Profile
Screenname: (get your screenname)
Search Community
in