Layouts and layout building

Benchwork, scenery, track, and more. If you're building a scale model train layout, this is where to go. If you're new here, please read our forum policies.

Last post 02-11-2009 2:47 PM by maxman. 6 replies.
Rate:
Sort Posts:
Page 1 of 1 (7 items)
02-09-2009 7:13 AM
Offline WyeMe
Not Ranked
Joined on 06-05-2008
Indiana
Posts 19

What is the better match

I am laying Micro Engineering trach with  ME Turnouts. I need to install a #4 Wye. I have narrowed my choices to Walthers or Peco.  My question is has anyone had experience with this combination? What matches up best with Micro Engineering track. I am running HO Code 83.

02-09-2009 5:15 PM In reply to
Offline Blind Bruce
Top 500 Contributor
Joined on 01-27-2005
Winnipeg Canada
Posts 1,022

Re: What is the better match

First question. Does ME not make a #4 wye? If not then the only considerations I can think of are:

1) You might need to shim up the WYE if the ties are of different thicknesses.

2) The method of actuating the WYE may be different than ME. ?????

02-10-2009 7:04 AM In reply to
Offline WyeMe
Not Ranked
Joined on 06-05-2008
Indiana
Posts 19

Re: What is the better match

Micro Engineering does not make a #4 anythng.   I have a tight area in which to do this so the #4 Wye is what I need in this situation. You can buy the points and frogs to make one but I do not trust my skills to take on such a project. What I am looking for is, which one, either Peco or Walthers, needs the least amount of adjustments

02-10-2009 8:50 AM In reply to
Offline Blind Bruce
Top 500 Contributor
Joined on 01-27-2005
Winnipeg Canada
Posts 1,022

Re: What is the better match

OK. I use Walthers/Shinohara code 83 and I have one of their Wyes that is only about 5" long. It is somewhat less than a #4 and is quite sharp. SO, to answer your question, I would look at the Walthers.

02-10-2009 10:42 AM In reply to
Offline maxman
Top 500 Contributor
Joined on 02-15-2008
Posts 868

Re: What is the better match

WyeMe:
I have a tight area in which to do this so the #4 Wye is what I need in this situation.

Is there any reason that you need a #4 wye?  This wye matches a #8 turnout frog angle (approximately).  Are you using #8 turnouts on your railroad?  If you have a tight area you can save some space (length) by using a lower number wye.

According to dimensions in the Walthers catalog, the Walthers/Shinohara code 83 wyes have the following overall lengths:

#5: 13-7/8 inches

#4: 9-23/32 inches

#3: 7-7/8 inches

#2-1/2: 7-3/16 inches

#2: 6 inches

02-11-2009 7:31 AM In reply to
Offline WyeMe
Not Ranked
Joined on 06-05-2008
Indiana
Posts 19

Re: What is the better match

The #4 radius fits the curvature of this spot in the layout. However, a turnout will not work because I want the spur to go to a future turntable in the middle of a loop. When I saw a photo of the Peco #4 Wye, I thought it would be right. Of course photos can be decieving. What I am actually asking here is when connecting the ME Track to either Wlathers or Peco, which of these is a closer match when dealing with the ME rail joiners and the height of the ties on both.  Thanks for all of your input.

02-11-2009 2:47 PM In reply to
Offline maxman
Top 500 Contributor
Joined on 02-15-2008
Posts 868

Re: What is the better match

Well, a non-scientific survey with random micrometer measurements indicates that the top of rail to bottom of tie measurement for a Walther's code 83 #6 turnout is approximately 0.140 inch.  The same measurement on a piece of what I believe is ME non-flexible flex track is 0.150 inch.  However, you should measure the ME track you have to confirm this measurement.

I can't speak for the Peco code 83 stuff because it is too expensive for my taste.

Page 1 of 1 (7 items)
Copyright © 2009 TRAINS.COM
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems
E-mail Address:
Password:
Remember me
Get Newsletter
Get our free weekly newsletter delivered to your inbox
My Profile
Screenname: (get your screenname)
Search Community
in