Electronics and DCC
The place to discuss wiring for DC and DCC controlled model train layouts. If you're new here, please read our forum policies.
Last post 01-03-2009 10:50 PM by jbinkley60. 31 replies.
|
Rate:
Sort Posts:
|
mobilman44
Joined on
09-17-2003
Southeast Texas
|
What is your Preference for Non-Sound HO Decoders?
Good Morning and a Very Happy New Year to you all!
As I am converting to DCC in a few months - along with rebuilding my layout - I figured its time I started asking your preference on decoder brands. While I have 5 BLI Paragon locos with decoders, none of the Stewart, P2K, Atlas, Kato, or Spectrum locos are so equipped - so I better start shopping.
Before I actually ask the question, let me say that I know my way around a soldering iron and wiring (not electronics), and the new DCC system will be Digitrax Super Chief w/4 districts.
Sooo, my question is, what brand of non-sound decoders do you prefer? I am more concerned about quality and availability and support - with price being somewhat secondary.
Thank you all in advance!
Mobilman44
|
davidmbedard
Joined on
03-26-2004
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
|
Re: What is your Preference for Non-Sound HO Decoders?
NCE D13SRJ. Inexpensive, loaded with features, has 4 light outputs, 9 pin interface (for easy decoder switchout)......... David B
|
elansp
Joined on
07-18-2007
Bergen County, NJ
|
Re: What is your Preference for Non-Sound HO Decoders?
|
jrbernier
Joined on
01-08-2001
Rochester, MN
|
Re: What is your Preference for Non-Sound HO Decoders?
It depends on what you are looking for in a decoder. You can buy basic 'fleet' decoders with 2 light function outputs and basic motor control in the $15 range. If you are looking for 4-6 light function outputs and 'BEMF' motor control, you can spend up to $25 for a decoder. NCE, TCS, and Digitrax all have decoders in both price ranges.
The other part of the equation is 'form factor':
-
Lightboard Replacements - These are specific to a brand/model of engine and you basically 'swap out' the supplied light board with the new decoder based one - they will cost more.
-
Wired Decoders - Most of these are in a small package with a JST 9 pin connector on the end of them. They may come with 9 loose wires or a JST to NMRA 8 pin cable so they can be plugged into a DCC Ready engine. You can buy various lengths/styles of DCC harnesses that work with these 9 pin JST decoders. This makes swapping out a decoder very convenient. A lot of the newer Athearn RTR engines have an NMRA socket and a short harness supplied with them - decoder install is very quick.
Check out www.tonystrains.com or www.litchfieldstation.com and compare featues/prices to get a 'feel' for this. There are a lot of dealers with very good decoder prices if you buy 'in bulk'(4-10 decoders).
Older Steward F unit engines have no socket - I just hard wire them Most P2K engines from about the mid 90's have a 8 pin socket, as do newer Kato/Atlas engines. The above 2 web sites and the manufacturers web sites have a lot of model specific decoder install info - Look for it and read up.
Jim Bernier
|
simon1966
Joined on
07-07-2003
Metro East St. Louis
|
Re: What is your Preference for Non-Sound HO Decoders?
I agree with all of the above.
I just picked up a 4 pack of the NCE D13SR decoders and these are an excellent low cost fleet decoder. I used all 4 for hard wire applications in an eclectic mixture of locomotives. In one of the applications (A 4 car Eurostar trains set) the 4 functions were very useful for adding control to interior lights in the passenger cars.
My absolute favorite non-sound decoders are from TCS. The MC2 range in particular is a real favorite. It is really small, which makes it great for tight spaces. The TCS back EMF is superb and provides amazing low speed control. Plus the goof proof warranty is hard to beat. I also like the fact that TCS offers a range of harness models to compliment the decoders which can be helpful in particular applications.
I also run Digitrax decoders and have no complaints about them.
All 3 are good manufacturers.
|
TA462
Joined on
06-07-2004
PORT HOPE, ONTARIO
|
Re: What is your Preference for Non-Sound HO Decoders?
I'm a fan of Digitrax decoders and in my 5 years in the hobby using Digitrax decoders and DCC equipment I have never had a decoder fail.
|
New Haven I-5
Joined on
11-10-2007
Southern California
|
Re: What is your Preference for Non-Sound HO Decoders?
|
jbinkley60
Joined on
02-19-2006
Gahanna, Ohio
|
Re: What is your Preference for Non-Sound HO Decoders?
mobilman44:
Good Morning and a Very Happy New Year to you all!
As I am converting to DCC in a few months - along with rebuilding my layout - I figured its time I started asking your preference on decoder brands. While I have 5 BLI Paragon locos with decoders, none of the Stewart, P2K, Atlas, Kato, or Spectrum locos are so equipped - so I better start shopping.
Before I actually ask the question, let me say that I know my way around a soldering iron and wiring (not electronics), and the new DCC system will be Digitrax Super Chief w/4 districts.
Sooo, my question is, what brand of non-sound decoders do you prefer? I am more concerned about quality and availability and support - with price being somewhat secondary.
Thank you all in advance!
Mobilman44
I use Digitrax decoders in all of mine. If you use the DH165 series decoders you can always add sound later. Many of the 165s have built-in current limiting for the lights so no bulb changes to worry about. Most of mine have been drop in or plug in conversions that go very quickly.
|
joe27
Joined on
08-08-2008
|
Re: What is your Preference for Non-Sound HO Decoders?
I have used Digitrax and TCS decoders for my older engines where all that was needed was the basics. Personally I like the way that the TCS decoders work much better than the Digitrax. Some of my Athearn blue box engines had a low speed growl with the Digitrax. When I switched to TCS the growl went away and the engine had a lot better low speed performance.
"Hope this helps,
Joe
|
draftingplans
Joined on
01-27-2002
Alexandria MN
|
Re: What is your Preference for Non-Sound HO Decoders?
NCE D13SRJ, 4 function for most applications as stated before. Use a PNP harness if the loco calls for it or hard wire it in. I have installed about 30 of them and have not had a failure yet.
Another source of decoders and great information about what decoder to use in locomotives is from Tim Smith at Empire Northern Models. Tim's store is only a few blocks from NCE. Great prices and especially if you need a number of decoders.
|
Mark R.
Joined on
04-25-2004
|
Re: What is your Preference for Non-Sound HO Decoders?
TCS all the way for me - have over 50 of them in use. Great running characteristics, very quiet, best price for all you get including the Goof Proof warantee .... I fried two of them (my own error) and they were replaced no questions asked !!!
Mark.
|
locoi1sa
Joined on
07-13-2006
|
Re: What is your Preference for Non-Sound HO Decoders?
TCS,NCE or Lenz. TCS is the way to go for performance and great lighting features. There rule 17 dimm when stopped and F4 is great. When used with LEDs the dimming is adjustable. NCE for the excelent ditch lights they have.
|
fmilhaupt
Joined on
05-29-2003
SE Michigan
|
Re: What is your Preference for Non-Sound HO Decoders?
While I use Digitrax as the control system, I much prefer NCE's decoders, for the simple reason that I prefer the way that NCE decoders support LEDs for lighting effects.
|
Phoebe Vet
Joined on
09-21-2007
Charlotte, NC
|
Re: What is your Preference for Non-Sound HO Decoders?
I have decoders from Digitrax, TCS, Bachmann (I think they are made by Lens), and Tsunami. I have been happy with them all. Once installed and operating properly, I have never had a decoder fail.
|
jbinkley60
Joined on
02-19-2006
Gahanna, Ohio
|
Re: What is your Preference for Non-Sound HO Decoders?
fmilhaupt:
While I use Digitrax as the control system, I much prefer NCE's decoders, for the simple reason that I prefer the way that NCE decoders support LEDs for lighting effects.
I am curious by your statement. I've always used Digitrax decoders and have never had the reason to look at NCE and others. What specifically do you like about the NCE decoders that I may be missing out on or is it how they've implemented the lighting effect feature ? I do agree that the FX3 functions that DIgitrax implements in the 163/165 series can be a little complex to program in the CVs but I've not found myself wanting for something else yet.
|
|
Get our free weekly newsletter delivered to your inbox
|