Trains.com Sites
Resources
Shop
E-mail Newsletters
SEARCH THIS SITE
Help
Contact Us »
|
Customer Service
Get our free e-mail newsletters
Model Railroader
(weekly)
Model Railroader VideoPlus
(weekly)
Trains
(weekly)
Classic Toy Trains
(bi-weekly)
Garden Railways
(bi-weekly)
Classic Trains
(bi-weekly)
By signing up I may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers from Trains.com. We do not sell, rent or trade our e-mail lists.
Details about our newsletters »
Read our privacy policy »
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Search Community
Searching
Please insert search terms into the box above to run a search on the community.
Users Online
There are no community members online
Thread Details
Rate This
74
Replies — 17521 Views
0
Subscribers
Posted
over 19 years ago
Thread Options
Subscribe via RSS
Share this
Tag Cloud
1950s
advice
Amtrak
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe
Baltimore and Ohio
Boxcars
Bridges
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Caboose
Canada
Canadian National Railway
Canadian Pacific Railway
cargo
Chicago
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy
Colorado and Southern
Coupler
Coupling
CSX
dcc sound
Depots
Diesel Engines
education
Emporia
fec
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 41: October 24, 2005
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 41: October 24, 2005
|
Want to post a reply to this topic?
Login
or
register
for an acount to join our online community today!
1
2
3
4
5
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 41: October 24, 2005
Posted by
wctransfer
on
Tue, Oct 25 2005 7:07 AM
Mikes. That wasnt much of a contest. Nice try though erik. It was hard for me, because i really dont like GE's. But the fall colors in Mike's look really nice.
Alec
Check out my pics! [url="http://wctransfer.rrpicturearchives.net/"] http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=8714
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
tmcc man
on
Tue, Oct 25 2005 8:57 AM
I went with 1. The image was awesome, and I liked how the engine came out of the shade.
Colin
from prr.railfan.net
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Oct 25 2005 9:21 AM
I prefer photo #1 as I am not a fan of standard 3/4 front view, rather something with a little more thought.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
walthuston
on
Tue, Oct 25 2005 9:57 AM
The colorful train in the colorfull countryside did it for me. Though the lighting wasn't too good, the mood was just right.
I liked photo 1, too, but not as much.
Walt Huston President Aberdeen, Tacoma & Spanaway Forrest Railroad
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
LVJJJ
on
Tue, Oct 25 2005 12:23 PM
Wow, the colors and lighting on 2 are fabulous. So, I voted for #2. I'ts also well posed and probably should be on a 2007 calendar. Larry in Las Vegas (our skimpy deciduous foliage doesn't turn until late December).
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
emmar
on
Tue, Oct 25 2005 12:52 PM
I liked photo 1 better even though it is a bit to dark. I like the fact that the engine is not in a paint scheme that I see a lot and photo 2 is too typical. I would love to see some differnt foliage shots instead of the same old thing.
Yes we call it the Dinky. Why? Well cause it's dinky! Proud to be the official train geek of Princeton University!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
wweidner
on
Tue, Oct 25 2005 2:33 PM
Why couldn't we have voted on the maintainance of way equipment or the SOO LINE caboose. Their different. I did vote for 2, nice shot.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Oct 25 2005 2:38 PM
Wow, not one comment about those 1930's vintage 'phone poles in photo #2. Take away the manicured ballast and the heavy motive power and you have the makin's of a rural branch line in the '40's. Way to go, Erik, you gotcher self a winner.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
jjlamkin
on
Tue, Oct 25 2005 2:38 PM
Erik/Mike, I had to vote for #2, the fall colors and locos just jump out at you! GREAT photo. Keep up the GREAT job.
My next winter project is replacing the seats in my motorcar.
Regards, Jim
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Oct 25 2005 2:43 PM
My apologies to Mike, photo #2 simply looks like a shot that Erik would take and I just blurted out his name. locoduke@aol.com
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Oct 25 2005 3:40 PM
I went with photo 2, just like the scene better... I don' t even mind the coudy day, I like it, it establishes a mood
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Oct 25 2005 3:43 PM
HOORAY FOR BLIND VOTING. KEEP IT UP. Both pictures make statements in their own way but my vote goes to Number 2.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
ShaunCN
on
Tue, Oct 25 2005 4:00 PM
photo 2 all the way, although i do enjoy CN, dash9's atre too common, however the photo was great. Photo one started off fine, until i coldn't see much more past the front of the locomotive.. too dark.
derailment? what derailment? All reports of derailments are lies. Their are no derailments within a hundreed miles of here.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
wcnut
on
Tue, Oct 25 2005 4:32 PM
Being that this is the 41st installment, I think I know whose shot it whose just by the way they are set up! But that doesn't matter, the only thing that matters is that #2 is the clear winner. I like the gutsy move with #1 shooting on the dark side of the train with the nose screamin' in your face. #2 has such a stong mood and feeling to it, I had to wipe the mist off my glasses!!! Nothing says Wisconsin autum more than overcast skies, wet autum leaves, and trains!!! Hats off to both though, I think both shots are technically strong.
Erik, I think you should have saved that AMTRAK shot for use in voting... very nice!!!
Greg
"wcnut"
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Oct 25 2005 8:21 PM
Had to go with photo #2 its clear sharp and the fall foliage adds the touch. Photo #1 only the shadow knows[?]
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
1
2
3
4
5
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 41: October 24, 2005