Trains.com Sites
Resources
Shop
E-mail Newsletters
SEARCH THIS SITE
Help
Contact Us »
|
Customer Service
Get our free e-mail newsletters
Model Railroader
(weekly)
Model Railroader VideoPlus
(weekly)
Trains
(weekly)
Classic Toy Trains
(bi-weekly)
Garden Railways
(bi-weekly)
Classic Trains
(bi-weekly)
By signing up I may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers from Trains.com. We do not sell, rent or trade our e-mail lists.
Details about our newsletters »
Read our privacy policy »
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Search Community
Searching
Please insert search terms into the box above to run a search on the community.
Users Online
There are no community members online
Thread Details
Rate This
64
Replies — 13869 Views
0
Subscribers
Posted
over 19 years ago
Thread Options
Subscribe via RSS
Share this
Tag Cloud
1950s
advice
Amtrak
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe
Baltimore and Ohio
Boxcars
Bridges
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Caboose
Canada
Canadian National Railway
Canadian Pacific Railway
cargo
Chicago
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy
Colorado and Southern
Coupler
Coupling
CSX
dcc sound
Depots
Diesel Engines
education
Emporia
fec
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 40: October 10, 2005
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 40: October 10, 2005
|
Want to post a reply to this topic?
Login
or
register
for an acount to join our online community today!
1
2
3
4
5
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 40: October 10, 2005
Posted by
jimmac230
on
Tue, Oct 11 2005 5:54 PM
Chose Erik's BNSF shot. See a occasional CP locomotive on the UP tracks out of Claremore and just prefer a mix-em-up of different locomotives that come through. You two are doing great and keep them coming.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
wcnut
on
Tue, Oct 11 2005 7:03 PM
Mike's photo is a good photo, although I would have liked to have seen more light on the nose. But Erik's photo is very interesting, I think it even goes agains the grain. Grain, corn, haha, bad pun! Anyway, it looked like the sharp focus was on the nose of the NS, but again, very interesting composition. It was hard to vote.
Greg
"wcnut"
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
walthuston
on
Wed, Oct 12 2005 9:40 AM
I Like Mike. His photo has character and is far more interesting to me. Erik has too much corn and too little train.
Walt Huston President Aberdeen, Tacoma & Spanaway Forrest Railroad
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Wed, Oct 12 2005 10:47 AM
Erik's shot helped the train look muscular in action, but my eyes kept being drawn to the in-focus leaves of the corn, instead of the train.
Also, I'm just a sucker for a train that's partially obscured as it moves through a bend.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
AC6000CW
on
Wed, Oct 12 2005 11:13 AM
i went with mike,s shot. it was a good picture.
http://www.railroadforums.com/photos/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=5025
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Wed, Oct 12 2005 11:34 AM
Mike's photo did it for me. It's a much more exciting picture, with the train barreling around the curve!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Sterling1
on
Wed, Oct 12 2005 11:40 AM
I think I blew my mind on this one, Mike's photo this time . . .
"There is nothing in life that compares with running a locomotive at 80-plus mph with the windows open, the traction motors screaming, the air horns fighting the rush of incoming air to make any sound at all, automobiles on adjacent highways trying and failing to catch up with you, and the unmistakable presence of raw power. You ride with fear in the pit of your stomach knowing you do not really have control of this beast." - D.C. Battle [Trains 10/2002 issue, p74.]
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
wctransfer
on
Wed, Oct 12 2005 5:50 PM
IM goin with Mike. Very nice shot. Erik, i just dont care for those Dash 9's. Nice perspective, but Mikes im gonna have to say, has a lot better power, and i like where he is shootin from.
Alec
Check out my pics! [url="http://wctransfer.rrpicturearchives.net/"] http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=8714
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Thu, Oct 13 2005 9:07 AM
Mikes. Because of the SD40-2's.
Allan.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Thu, Oct 13 2005 12:09 PM
Kudos to both Mike & Eric for this installments photos. [:)]
Both shots are nicely done and choosing was difficult, but I had to vote for Eric's picture. Mike's photo is well done and has good composition, but it is a "typical" railroad shot, one that we've seen many times over.
Eric's photo is more imaginative.[^] His composition is the more difficult of the two. It is difficult to work from the "going away" perspective, but I feel that he pulled it off. Also the use of the corn in the foreground adds a "magical" feel to the shot... It is as if the locomotives are afloat on a sea of green rather than riding steel rails. Combine the clever use of the foreground with the perspective used and you can see that Eric put more thought into his photo resulting in an distinctive piece of work. Nice job Eric! [:D]
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Thu, Oct 13 2005 5:56 PM
The NS unit made me go with Erik.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Fri, Oct 14 2005 2:17 AM
Hats off to Mike on this shot! Excellent capture!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
emmar
on
Fri, Oct 14 2005 1:01 PM
Darn, it won't let me vote for both. They are both great photos, but I guess that I will have to go with Eriks photo because I think it takes more skill to put together a great going away shot like that than an overhead coming on shot like Mikes. that and getting the corn and the locomotives to look good in the same photo is great. I guess I just like the weirdness of haveing a field of corn in the shot.Good job both of you this week.
Yes we call it the Dinky. Why? Well cause it's dinky! Proud to be the official train geek of Princeton University!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Sat, Oct 15 2005 10:07 AM
It was a tough choice, but seeing the engineer in his bib overalls added so much of a human element that that clinched it for me. I really liked the unique perspective of the corn in the foreground, and I never really liked 'portrait' compositions (except with people), but the visible engineer was enough to sway me.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Sun, Oct 16 2005 2:45 PM
I think Mike's photo is much more realistic than Eric's.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
1
2
3
4
5
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 40: October 10, 2005