Trains.com Sites
Resources
Shop
E-mail Newsletters
SEARCH THIS SITE
Help
Contact Us »
|
Customer Service
Get our free e-mail newsletters
Model Railroader
(weekly)
Model Railroader VideoPlus
(weekly)
Trains
(weekly)
Classic Toy Trains
(bi-weekly)
Garden Railways
(bi-weekly)
Classic Trains
(bi-weekly)
By signing up I may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers from Trains.com. We do not sell, rent or trade our e-mail lists.
Details about our newsletters »
Read our privacy policy »
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Search Community
Searching
Please insert search terms into the box above to run a search on the community.
Users Online
There are no community members online
Thread Details
Rate This
74
Replies — 16569 Views
0
Subscribers
Posted
over 19 years ago
Thread Options
Subscribe via RSS
Share this
Tag Cloud
1950s
advice
Amtrak
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe
Baltimore and Ohio
Boxcars
Bridges
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Caboose
Canada
Canadian National Railway
Canadian Pacific Railway
cargo
Chicago
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy
Colorado and Southern
Coupler
Coupling
CSX
dcc sound
Depots
Diesel Engines
education
Emporia
fec
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 35: July 25, 2005
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 35: July 25, 2005
|
Want to post a reply to this topic?
Login
or
register
for an acount to join our online community today!
1
2
3
4
5
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 35: July 25, 2005
Posted by
Davidson Ward
on
Tue, Jul 26 2005 7:01 AM
Nice.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
PRRK4s1361
on
Tue, Jul 26 2005 7:14 AM
Both pix are good but the way that the rain shower brings out the greenery of the trees and grass in #1 seems to do it for me. The angle of #2 doesn't seem right to me. If the front of the double-stacker was more noticeable that sould have made a difference (my opinion). If you have a meet both sets of power should be visible.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
alstom
on
Tue, Jul 26 2005 7:57 AM
Ok, i'm writing again to admit that pic 2 isn't that bad although it still didn't get my vote.
[bow]to photo number 1
Richard Click
here
to go to my rail videos! Click
here
to go to my rail photos! .........
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Jul 26 2005 8:45 AM
Booth are nice but I think I like # One better.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
walthuston
on
Tue, Jul 26 2005 9:51 AM
Art, schmart...I voted for the real train photo, not the artsy thingy. Nmber 2 was way too boring for me.
Walt
Walt Huston President Aberdeen, Tacoma & Spanaway Forrest Railroad
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Jul 26 2005 10:08 AM
A very tough decision this time---I'll go with photo 1 because it is my feeling of what a good part of railroading is about. Machines moving through nature, but not making that big of impact.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Sterling1
on
Tue, Jul 26 2005 10:09 AM
Photo 2 for the detail, and cheers for the strange humor
"There is nothing in life that compares with running a locomotive at 80-plus mph with the windows open, the traction motors screaming, the air horns fighting the rush of incoming air to make any sound at all, automobiles on adjacent highways trying and failing to catch up with you, and the unmistakable presence of raw power. You ride with fear in the pit of your stomach knowing you do not really have control of this beast." - D.C. Battle [Trains 10/2002 issue, p74.]
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
LVJJJ
on
Tue, Jul 26 2005 10:30 AM
Since photography is 98% lighting, had to go with #2. Its dramatic, eye-catching and features sunshine! #1 is run of the mill and has a depressing dark green landscape, which is why I moved from the dark, dank Pacific Northwest to the sunshine of Las Vegas. The train is overwhelmed by the greenery and seems to be secondary to the landscape photo which makes it the artsy shot. The only "art" I like must have machinery in it such as trains, planes and automobiles. Rather than landscapes I prefer unusual views of machinery such as photo 2. I may have to frame this one. Larry in Las Vegas.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Jul 26 2005 11:07 AM
I thought both photos were good,but I had to go with # 2, the way the lighting was captured and I thought it had a little more to tell ,than just a train pulling freight, todays trains certainly are busy and this pic pretty much shows that. Great job guys ,always enjoy your photos. My own MR isUP & CSX love 'em all .bob_771@ hotmail.com
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Jul 26 2005 11:28 AM
I like the low light, meeting trains, and signals in photo 2. I voted for photo 2.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Jul 26 2005 11:42 AM
I voted for photo 2. The contest is about THE BEST PHOTOGRAPH, not our favorite trains shots. Number 2 is the best photograph, no matter who took it.
If I voted only for my favorite train shots, there would be nothing but Armour Yellow and Grey in the pictures! [:)]
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
louglatzer
on
Tue, Jul 26 2005 12:06 PM
Both are good photos but I picked #1 because it's a classical image of summertime railroading. I agree, a return to blind voting is a very good idea!
obasher
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Jul 26 2005 12:25 PM
HAS to be #1 for me. As a railfan I expect to see trains you can identify. As others have mentioned, this about trains not about art ! Prefer the blind voting.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Jul 26 2005 12:37 PM
Photo 1 is a great train shot -- great setting et al. But Photo 2 is art -- I showed them around the office and the photography types all said they would hang it on the wall. But again -- tough choice.
Hey, in Photo 1, what are those yellow cars just out of the curve?
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Jul 26 2005 12:40 PM
A really difficult choice --both are good shots (the scenery in 1 and the drama of 2), but I had to with 2... sorry 1!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
1
2
3
4
5
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 35: July 25, 2005