Trains.com Sites
Resources
Shop
E-mail Newsletters
SEARCH THIS SITE
Help
Contact Us »
|
Customer Service
Get our free e-mail newsletters
Model Railroader
(weekly)
Model Railroader VideoPlus
(weekly)
Trains
(weekly)
Classic Toy Trains
(bi-weekly)
Garden Railways
(bi-weekly)
Classic Trains
(bi-weekly)
By signing up I may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers from Trains.com. We do not sell, rent or trade our e-mail lists.
Details about our newsletters »
Read our privacy policy »
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Search Community
Searching
Please insert search terms into the box above to run a search on the community.
Users Online
There are no community members online
Thread Details
Rate This
82
Replies — 17819 Views
0
Subscribers
Posted
over 19 years ago
Thread Options
Subscribe via RSS
Share this
Tag Cloud
1950s
advice
Amtrak
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe
Baltimore and Ohio
Boxcars
Bridges
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Caboose
Canada
Canadian National Railway
Canadian Pacific Railway
cargo
Chicago
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy
Colorado and Southern
Coupler
Coupling
CSX
dcc sound
Depots
Diesel Engines
education
Emporia
fec
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 29: April 18, 2005
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 29: April 18, 2005
|
Want to post a reply to this topic?
Login
or
register
for an acount to join our online community today!
«
2
3
4
5
6
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 29: April 18, 2005
Posted by
mandelswamp
on
Fri, Apr 22 2005 11:10 AM
Mike, if you had used your photo that is seen on the WSOR site, then I would have voted for your picture. The photo on the WSOR site gives you a great view of the matched E units. The nose on shot that you used for the voting does not give the voters an adequate view of those locomotives. Yes, including the location sign was a nice touch but I feel that nose on shots do not do justice to a train - its hard to tell that there are business coaches behind the locomotives. While the lighting may not have been ideal, Erik's angled shot allows the voters to truly see the entire business train. Since I believe that the goal of this week's contest was to shot a business train, I think Erik's picture better met that goal and therefore won my vote. In summary, a nose shot is great to show off the nose of a locomotive but an angled shot allows for the viewing of the entire train and that was what this contest was all about.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Fri, Apr 22 2005 12:02 PM
Went with Mike's shot, you don't see many of those. UP is everywhere, good shot, but not as interesting. . . at least to me
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
David Bennett
on
Fri, Apr 22 2005 2:07 PM
Agree with several of the responses, the WSOR website shot is the best of the bunch. I'm a farm boy so the farm buildings in the background helped my opinion.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Sterling1
on
Fri, Apr 22 2005 6:52 PM
Americana all the way WSOR takes the vote this time.
"There is nothing in life that compares with running a locomotive at 80-plus mph with the windows open, the traction motors screaming, the air horns fighting the rush of incoming air to make any sound at all, automobiles on adjacent highways trying and failing to catch up with you, and the unmistakable presence of raw power. You ride with fear in the pit of your stomach knowing you do not really have control of this beast." - D.C. Battle [Trains 10/2002 issue, p74.]
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Fri, Apr 22 2005 10:26 PM
I liked Mike's heads up shot of the WOS E units best although both were good.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Sat, Apr 23 2005 7:44 AM
If I could have voted for both, I would have. They were both great shots. Mike's won out , strictly because it showed E units. As already said I too wish I could have seen more of the train
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Sat, Apr 23 2005 3:08 PM
Went with Erik's! Both are nice!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
fievel
on
Fri, Apr 29 2005 9:58 AM
Small town, jointed rail, Covered wagon : Great shot, Mike!
Cascade Green Forever !
GET RICH QUICK !! Count your Blessings.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
«
2
3
4
5
6
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 29: April 18, 2005