Trains.com Sites
Resources
Shop
E-mail Newsletters
SEARCH THIS SITE
Help
Contact Us »
|
Customer Service
Get our free e-mail newsletters
Model Railroader
(weekly)
Model Railroader VideoPlus
(weekly)
Trains
(weekly)
Classic Toy Trains
(bi-weekly)
Garden Railways
(bi-weekly)
Classic Trains
(bi-weekly)
By signing up I may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers from Trains.com. We do not sell, rent or trade our e-mail lists.
Details about our newsletters »
Read our privacy policy »
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Search Community
Searching
Please insert search terms into the box above to run a search on the community.
Users Online
There are no community members online
Thread Details
Rate This
82
Replies — 17819 Views
0
Subscribers
Posted
over 19 years ago
Thread Options
Subscribe via RSS
Share this
Tag Cloud
1950s
advice
Amtrak
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe
Baltimore and Ohio
Boxcars
Bridges
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Caboose
Canada
Canadian National Railway
Canadian Pacific Railway
cargo
Chicago
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy
Colorado and Southern
Coupler
Coupling
CSX
dcc sound
Depots
Diesel Engines
education
Emporia
fec
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 29: April 18, 2005
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 29: April 18, 2005
|
Want to post a reply to this topic?
Login
or
register
for an acount to join our online community today!
1
2
3
4
5
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 29: April 18, 2005
Posted by
Bergie
on
Mon, Apr 18 2005 2:32 PM
This week's installment of Trackside with Erik and Mike is now live within the Railroading section on the Trains.com home page. Please read this week's column and then vote for your favorite photo below.
Click here to read Trackside with Erik and Mike Vol. 29
.
Erik Bergstrom
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Replies to this thread are ordered from "oldest to newest". To reverse this order, click
here
.
To learn about more about sorting options, visit our
FAQ page
.
Posted by
LennyFries
on
Mon, Apr 18 2005 3:39 PM
Guys: If yer gonna fight, do it right- ten paces and toss yer camera's at each other!!! I think the UP's business train is a good shot cause you can see all the train and know it's consist. The other is hard to see that it is a passenger train so different from all the rest. I do like the E-units head in the face shot. Lenny
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Noah Hofrichter
on
Mon, Apr 18 2005 4:53 PM
What can I say, WSOR E-UNIT I'M THERE!!!!!!! These are the units that the WSOR had up untill 2001, when they sold them. The units went into storage by the company that bought them for a while, but then the WSOR bought then back last fall. They are, in my opinion, some of the best looking deisel Engines out there. The WSOR's paint shop forces in Horicon Wisconsin, painted them. They did really a supurb job on, as they do with all of the stuff they paint. But enought of my rantings, Mike's it is! One of the other things I like about the picture is that if you blow it up, you can see the Conductor waving!
Noah
Click the image above to visit my website, Badger Rails. My Model Railroad Club's website:
http://sandhousecrew.webng.com
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
espeefoamer
on
Mon, Apr 18 2005 5:49 PM
I went with Erik's photo because you can see the entire train.Mike,if you had submitted the photo posted on the W&S website,you would have easily gotten my vote.
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Kathi Kube
on
Mon, Apr 18 2005 6:56 PM
Gotta side with Erik on this one, guys. I'm a sucker for pastoral Wisconsin scenery (read: cows, barns, fields, ...) and I love seeing more of the train. Although, you nearly had me on this one, Mike, with that lovely WSOR. If you'd shot her a little more broadside, I'd be there all the way.
Until next time...
Kathi
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Apr 18 2005 7:08 PM
Tough, but ended up going with Erik's for the reasons stated above, more of the train visable won it, and they are just so shinny. Just a little bit more of a 3/4 shot on Mike's and it would have been an easy winner, a smaller local railroad with E-units up front, yowza.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Apr 18 2005 7:10 PM
First I'm gonna say WOW to two good shots. Its take time plus talent to get both snapshots. The big UP, and at that a business consist, don't see them to often, so I gotta go with the recognition of each individual car clearly sighted. Then too, I must confess, having worked as a UP train conductor, so many times I wondered if I'd ever get my opportunity to ride inside. The picture only accentuated my continued dream. Maybe one day. THANKS! Brother HK Hall
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Apr 18 2005 7:21 PM
Hello all, its your St. Louis photo guru checking in after a long slumber. Also after being recently published in the Feb. 2005 CTC Board and (hopefully) soon to be published the the TRAINS Magazine "Gallery." [:D] Mike, I must say your photo is wonderful. It is much better composed, has better lighting, and a more interesting subject. You smoothly incorporated the Saukville sign into the photo and gave it a sence of "being." Oh, and did I say good composition? [;)] Well done Mike!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Apr 18 2005 7:42 PM
I voted for eric as i am a up fan,(as well as a new haven rr fan). But that is not the main reason, I like alot of other people enjoyed seeing the whole train, not just the lead engine. I would have voted for mikes' shot if it had at least a few of the engines, I like older diesels vice the newer diesels.
Ben
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
gemperfilm
on
Mon, Apr 18 2005 7:44 PM
I have to go with Erik and the UP. The funky lighting turned out to be an asset, kind of a sweet surreal light that you sometimes get video-taping near dusk. I like it.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
chanda
on
Mon, Apr 18 2005 8:00 PM
I had to go with Mike's photo. You don't see E-units every day and when you do its a picture from any angle.
Chanda
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Apr 18 2005 8:20 PM
Hard to vote against E units, but Mike's shot was too nose-on...couldn't even be sure it was a business train behind. The less-than-perfect light on Erik's shot actually enhanced it in the digital image, in a way that it probably *wouldn't* have on film.
Now, if Mike had entered the photo currently on the Wisconsin and Southern's Web site, that would have earned my vote--no contest.
--Mike
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
acelachaser
on
Mon, Apr 18 2005 8:36 PM
Gotta go with the broadside shot on this too..I'm a sucker for E units as well,but even more for the whole train. The only thing that would have made Erik's photo better would have been if UP was leading with their E units.
And again..another shot that shows the adavantage of digital vs. film and the Rebel's capacities
When someone realizes that people don't like waiting at 2 a.m. for a train that's 2 hours late...then Amtrak will be in trouble
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
fish1467
on
Mon, Apr 18 2005 8:48 PM
I liked the historical feel of Mike's photo.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Apr 18 2005 8:50 PM
Had to vote for Mike this time that head shot close up an the fireman waveing is a shot of days gone by. Two AA e-units an varnish on a run today thats two thumbs up!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
1
2
3
4
5
»
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 29: April 18, 2005