Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

grade percentage

2684 views
15 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Whitby, ON
  • 2,594 posts
grade percentage
Posted by CP5415 on Thursday, November 27, 2003 9:07 PM
I need to get a track up & over another, in a short piece of real estate if at all possible. I'm thinking somewhere inbetween 3-4% grade. I could get away with using a 2.5% grade but it would leave less space at the end of the incline
to move trains around at the top.
It's going to be a "shortline" moving small trains, about 2-3 cars per train, to & from a working interchange with my "class 1".
Popular vote wins in the end
Your help, advice or suggestions would be appreciated.
[:)]

Gordon

Brought to you by the letters C.P.R. as well as D&H!

 K1a - all the way

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Guelph, Ont.
  • 1,476 posts
Posted by BR60103 on Thursday, November 27, 2003 10:20 PM
Gordon:
I have a 2% maximum on my RR. I have some locos that haul fairly long trains up it and others that struggle with 5 or 6 cars. Do experiment with your own locos to see what they will take.
You can make a grade test track from a straight 8' board. The number of inches that the one end is higher is the grade percent (as close as you need.)

--David

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: North Central Illinois
  • 1,458 posts
Posted by CBQ_Guy on Friday, November 28, 2003 12:08 AM
Choice 6.) As little as possible!
"Paul [Kossart] - The CB&Q Guy" [In Illinois] ~ Modeling the CB&Q and its fictional 'Illiniwek River-Subdivision-Branch Line' in the 1960's. ~
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, November 28, 2003 10:32 AM
On my 5'x12' all grades are 2%-3% and I have 4 "up & over" track crossings.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, November 28, 2003 10:42 AM
Really this is up to you and what your trains can handle. I'd experment with each engine that would have to transgresse those up and overs.

try them alone first to find the max grade you can handle for the worst engine (worst meaning the one that handles the lowest grade and still moves), then slowely add cars to it and decrease the grade till the train smoothly for the max number fo cars you'll pull over it (i'd add a few cars more than you plan just to be safe).

Jay
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,616 posts
Posted by dehusman on Friday, November 28, 2003 1:00 PM
.5 to 1.5%. If you go 2% or more most steamers will have dramatic reductions in capacity.

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: California - moved to North Carolina 2018
  • 4,422 posts
Posted by DSchmitt on Friday, November 28, 2003 1:46 PM
Since you will only be moving 2-3 cars a 4% grade should be no problem.

I tried to sell my two cents worth, but no one would give me a plug nickel for it.

I don't have a leg to stand on.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: CA
  • 245 posts
help
Posted by bruce22 on Friday, November 28, 2003 5:44 PM
thru necessity my helix is 3.5% . Either I limit the length of the train or I " double the hill". I prefer the latter.
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: CA
  • 170 posts
Posted by cp1057 on Friday, November 28, 2003 8:28 PM
Although I voted 3%, that is only in theory. My actual grade is 0%. My layout is strictly a "water route" I am a-feared of grades and avoid them at all costs. It's enough of a challenge to get a nice level track what with the unlooked-for grades in my basement floor!

Charles
Hillsburgh Ontario
  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: along the B&O in INDIANA
  • 211 posts
Posted by yellowducky on Friday, November 28, 2003 11:28 PM
The steeper the grade, the longer the straight "runway" I put before it. I like to play
"I think I can, I think I can, I think I can." Also, I try to avoid a sharp curve at the top.
FDM TRAIN up a child in the way he should go...Proverbs22:6 Garrett, home of The Garrett Railroaders, and other crazy people. The 5 basic food groups are: candy, poptarts, chocolate, pie, and filled donuts !
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Whitby, ON
  • 2,594 posts
Posted by CP5415 on Sunday, November 30, 2003 9:34 PM
Ok, so after testing several locomotives separately on a 3.5% grade, including an Athearn GP9
in my "shortline" livery, which is the MEC by the way, all of them were able to pull 5 Athearn passenger cars up this grade with little difficulty.
All these locomotives were tested with 7 Roundhouse bulkend flatcars, again with no difficulty.
Thanks for your input, I think i'm going to go with a 3% grade

Gordon

Brought to you by the letters C.P.R. as well as D&H!

 K1a - all the way

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, December 1, 2003 7:50 PM
I really shouldn't go here and some will cringe others will laugh and others will walk away.
But I'm talking up to 7%+, ouch you say, hence the big power on the M.E.S.S.

I'm trying to bring the grades down but I will still be left with a minimum of 4 to 5%.

Oh but what scenery!!!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, December 1, 2003 8:10 PM
I have rather steep grades on my 4X9 layout. Dont know exactly what the grade is maybe a 4% or 5%. I have some locos that pull fine up it but others don't. That allows me to have some fun with helpers. I've spent many fun hours trying to get a train of a loco and 4 cars and a helper up the hill going real slow.

Thanks,
Jeremy

Go Packers
stinking Detroit[:(!]
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Monday, December 1, 2003 9:54 PM
I have no grades, so i don't have a problem with that. I suppose if my layout was larger I would use the lowest grades possible.

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, December 1, 2003 11:55 PM
I only have a couple of feet of flat track. I tried to keep my grades under 2% but I failed in a couple of places. 7 traverses to get from the bottom to the top of my mountain.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: San Jose, California
  • 3,154 posts
Posted by nfmisso on Tuesday, December 2, 2003 11:47 AM
Do NOT forget transitions !!! AKA vertical easements.

PRR had a branch in Ohio, which went down to the river with over 4% (.5%?). A single SD9 could only handle three or four cars on the branch.

On the SR's Murphy branch, a pair of GP38/GP38-2 (with dynamic brakes) would be used for 10 - 12 cars, because of the grades.
Nigel N&W in HO scale, 1950 - 1955 (..and some a bit newer too) Now in San Jose, California

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!