QUOTE: Originally posted by sp4449daylight hey all, was wondering what would be the best company to buy from when wanting to buy a ho scale model of the daylight 4449, made from brass?? i know ill be expensive but does anyone know how much id roughly cost??thanks.
Tom View my layout photos! http://s299.photobucket.com/albums/mm310/TWhite-014/Rio%20Grande%20Yuba%20River%20Sub One can NEVER have too many Articulateds!
QUOTE: Originally posted by Doug Goulbourn I agree with Tom. I have both a Balboa GS-1(Master Series) and GS-4 that seem practically bullet-proof. They still run well for being 30+ years old and while not up to today's detail standards will still pass muster in photos and pull like crazy. Doug
QUOTE: Originally posted by sp4449daylight also, did any company make a brass model of a 482 type SP steam engine??thanks.
QUOTE: Originally posted by twhite On the Mountains--Bangert1's right on the money about the Key models--I have an MT-5 that is an incredible runner and puller, and has detail to salivate over. I also have an earlier KTM Balboa MT-4 that is a very handsome (and heavy) loco. Both are superb machines--I'd almost be willing to bet that on straight and level track, either one of them could match the prototype's pulling power. One thing nobody's mentioned yet, is minimum radius for these SP locomotives--being brass, they don't have the driver side-play 'give' of current plastic models, so make sure you have at least a 26" minimum radius for them to run on. They're BIG locomotives, and they like BIG curves! Tom [:D]
QUOTE: Originally posted by bangert1 QUOTE: Originally posted by twhite On the Mountains--Bangert1's right on the money about the Key models--I have an MT-5 that is an incredible runner and puller, and has detail to salivate over. I also have an earlier KTM Balboa MT-4 that is a very handsome (and heavy) loco. Both are superb machines--I'd almost be willing to bet that on straight and level track, either one of them could match the prototype's pulling power. One thing nobody's mentioned yet, is minimum radius for these SP locomotives--being brass, they don't have the driver side-play 'give' of current plastic models, so make sure you have at least a 26" minimum radius for them to run on. They're BIG locomotives, and they like BIG curves! Tom [:D] Tom You are correct about the radius for brass, but that is the way brass was made as you are aware. A good rule of thumb is to use at least the 26" you listed, but most brass models run better on 30" to 36". The Westside Models needed a larger radius than the older Balboa's, at least that is what I found. The club where I was operating in the seventies had 30" radius and my Westside Daylights needed more lateral play added to the main drivers to prevent climbing out of the rails. KTM might have used different specifications, as my Balboa models seemed to take the same curves OK. Who knows why??
QUOTE: Funny thing, though, I've got an old PFM Santa Fe 2-10-2 (without brake shoe castings) that has such enormous side-play on the drivers that it'll negotiate a 24" with ease. You're right, you can NEVER tell about brass, LOL! Tom
QUOTE: Originally posted by CrazyShay QUOTE: Funny thing, though, I've got an old PFM Santa Fe 2-10-2 (without brake shoe castings) that has such enormous side-play on the drivers that it'll negotiate a 24" with ease. You're right, you can NEVER tell about brass, LOL! Tom You are right about that! I've got a PFM C&O 2-8-4 that will do 18" easily, yet I have a Overland C&O 4-8-4 That won't even do 24". As you said its real hard to tell with brass. Everyone is diffrent