Login
or
Register
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Home
»
Model Railroader
»
Forums
»
General Discussion (Model Railroader)
»
Minimum Turn-out Size
Minimum Turn-out Size
1194 views
7 replies
Order Ascending
Order Descending
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Minimum Turn-out Size
Posted by
Anonymous
on Sunday, November 3, 2002 3:45 PM
What is the MINIMUM yard turn-out size for modern 89' equipment (Auto racks/Superliner, etc)? Which is the "best" size?
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Sunday, November 3, 2002 5:13 PM
Hello Aaron,
I'd use nothing less than a no. 6 turnout. No. 4s are really too tight for equipment that long. Oh, they might negotiate it, but uncomfortably. So goes with no. 6s and you'll be much more content.
Hope this helps,
Paul Schmidt
Associate Editor
Model Railroader
Reply
Edit
Sperandeo
Member since
January 2001
From: US
1,300 posts
Posted by
Sperandeo
on Monday, November 4, 2002 9:44 AM
Hi Aaron,
To add to what Paul wrote, the National Model Railroad Association has a "Recommended Practice," RP11, for minimum turnout and curvature standards for various classes of rolling stock in all scales. You can see it online at www.nmra.org/standards/rp-11.html.
Good luck with your layout,
Andy
Andy Sperandeo
MODEL RAILROADER Magazine
Andy Sperandeo MODEL RAILROADER Magazine
Reply
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Monday, November 4, 2002 10:25 AM
Hi Aaron,
Also, see Andy's sidebar in the October 2002 Model Railroader on modeling the New Orleans Union Passenger Terminal. Andy discusses Peco's space-saving no. 6 turnouts, which may be just the ticket for you.
Regards,
Paul Schmidt
Contributing Editor
Trains.com
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Tuesday, November 5, 2002 2:51 PM
Wow. All of MR's big guns are weighing in! Personally, even though those long cars will negotiate #6s, to look good and to operate reliably, I'd prefer #8s. Fortunately, my layout is around-the-wall with 36" min curve radius which makes my 8-car Broad Way Limited look pretty good. Smaller layouts may not be able to afford that luxury.
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Tuesday, November 5, 2002 6:57 PM
Aaron, you're getting some pretty good answers here. One thing also to keep in mind...depending on how many tracks you're dealing with, the DESIGN of the ladder has a lot to do with "what minimum frog #" cars will negotiate. It's those nasty 'reverse S bends' they don't like...if you can avoid 'conventional' crossovers with #6 turnouts[2 lefts or 2 rights[, then do so
...try a modern track planning book like John Armstrong's Kalmbach book, and do refer to Andy's New Orleans layout mentioned above.
regards / Mike
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Saturday, November 9, 2002 5:48 PM
Much obliged!
-Aaron
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Saturday, November 9, 2002 8:40 PM
Are the space saving # 6 turnouts the ones that Peco calls "Medium Radius Turnouts?"
Reply
Edit
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Users Online
There are no community member online
Search the Community
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter
See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter
and get model railroad news in your inbox!
Sign up