Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Containers -- NMRA standards needed?

1276 views
4 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,427 posts
Containers -- NMRA standards needed?
Posted by dknelson on Thursday, July 18, 2002 8:12 AM
OK here is a new topic for you. the latest (July) NMRA bulletin has a letter from a Dutch modelers who points out that while ALL international containers are 100% compatible, NONE of the HO models of them are! And it goes beyond how they mount and fasten to each other (although that is itself an annoyance -- you cannot double stack different makes of container) he showed photos of just about every make of container of what is supposedly the same size -- and they are all different! I mean, 40 feet should be 40 feet, right? But not for containers. Not in HO. Makes you wonder what else we buy is "close but no cigar."
He asks if this is an area where the NMRA has a role to play -- with a standard for mounting (I don't know what the NMRA can do about manufactuers claiming everything between 38 feet and 42 feet is 40 feet other than to deny scale conformity on their warrant, which few manufacturers even seem to care about anymore).

I urge you to read the guy's letter and look at the photos he provides. Very interesting and provocative points. What do you think?
Dave Nelson
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 18, 2002 2:39 PM
This is a very good point.The NMRA ought to look into this. So often we are concerned about standards on the high rech phases of the hobby such as DCC. But this low tech issue requires some standards as well.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 18, 2002 3:51 PM
Iam with you.All containers need to work together.Where we can model stack trains.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 18, 2002 7:13 PM
I started a similar thread on the Atlas website forum. There appears to be a groundswell of support for this type of standard by the NMRA.
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Anderson Indiana
  • 1,301 posts
Posted by rogerhensley on Wednesday, July 24, 2002 7:42 AM
I believe that they do need to be interchangable, but as it has nothing to do with the 'Interchange' of model railroads, I can't see the NMRA getting involved. Their thrust is trackage, wheels, weight, clearances, electrical operation, etc. I can't think of any case where the NMRA has recommended the modeled details of a piece of rolling stock.

I would think that the purchaser has more to say about these items not being modeled correctly by simply informing the particular manufacturer that he won't buy unless they can be used with other manufacturer's containers.

Roger

Roger Hensley
= ECI Railroad - http://madisonrails.railfan.net/eci/eci_new.html =
= Railroads of Madison County - http://madisonrails.railfan.net/

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!