Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote]QUOTE: Originally posted by rrinker And now MY question to MTH. You have written in this thread the Back EMF is not under contention, ONLY the use of Back-EMF to offer 1smph speed increments. Therefore if QSI for example used Back-EMF but did not offer the ability to control at exactly 1smph increments, am I to assume that MTH would have no issue with this? [/quote] Does this mean that if (BIG IF) I developed a DCC system that used back EMF to control speed in say, 2 mph increments, that MTH wouldn't litigate[?] I mean after all, it would be different than Mikes, wouldn't it??[}:)]
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag

Update Reply

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Model Railroader Newsletter See all

Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!