Hi all I just recently got a box of some old steam egines,They ar all metal with the rope type electrical cord.I had tested it an no luck is there anyway to get these? Too work I never tried to take these.Apart not sure what to do any help would be great Thanks.What year are these these from also I have 9 packs of the Kadee couplers.They have the price on the pakcage what year is this from?
Well, pictures would help.
I had a few old steamers, but they were so old they were junk and I just tossed them.
What model couplers are they? Someone might be able to identify them from the model. If they are the old reliable #5s, the age doesn't matter. They will still work.
No, sorry, you're not sitting with undiscovered treasure.
It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse.
Right at the beginning of the forum is, How to post photos.
Rich
If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.
If the metal they're made of is brass, they could be worth something. If they're not brass, they're probably old Mantua or MDC or Varney kit engines. Not particularly valuable.
"Rope type electrical cord"??
Well, as the saying goes, one man's junk is another man's gold... It's hard to say without pictures. It is likely that these engines (brass or metal) will have some value, unless the metal has started rotting away. I follow Ebay and I can tell you that the value of old MDC and Mantua steamers in working order is not going down...
Simon
wjstix"Rope type electrical cord"??
I'd guess it to be one of the old two-wire cords, with each wire covered in an outer sheath of fabric, and the two wires braided together.
MetrolinkFan....also I have 9 packs of the Kadee couplers.They have the price on the pakcage what year is this from?
The price is irrelevant, but all Kadees are compatible for coupling purposes, but not necessarily so as far as uncoupling is concerned. Kadees are usually classified by the part number shown on the envelope, for example #5,#8,#36,#146, or #178. You can check out the various Kadee couplers here, although there are some others which are no longer in production.
For the other stuff, pictures would help us to help you.
Wayne
doctorwayneKadees are usually classified by the part number shown on the envelope...
I think Kadee had something going on before what became the #5 came along. But it seems it had no number in the original version. This unopened pack of Kadees was in among some other items donated to our division at a recent train show. Stuff seemed to all be mid-50s NLT 1956. For reference purposes, here you go.
Of course, if you're really old school, there are these:
Mike Lehman
Urbana, IL
mlehmanI think Kadee had something going on before what became the #5 came along. But it seems it had no number in the original version. This unopened pack of Kadees was in among some other items donated to our division at a recent train show. Stuff seemed to all be mid-50s NLT 1956. For reference purposes, here you go.
Mike, those are very similar to the couplers I used on my first HO trains in 1956. As I mentioned in my previous post, all Kadees will couple with all other Kadees, but won't necessarily uncouple from each other.I knew these mainly as their K-type, although I don't know if that was ever an official name. They offered remoted coupling via a diamond-shaped ramp, which, when a spring-loaded button on the control panel diagram was pressed, the diamond-shaped ramp lifted, spreading the two adjacent pins projecting from the knuckles, thereby opening the knuckles and separating the cars.
With a little practice (and some unlikely speeds for switching), one could do a flying drop into an adjacent track.
When the Magnematic couplers first appeared, I hated the look of the uncoupling wire for the track magnets, and cut them off as soon as I opened the package. I still don't care for their appearance, but do use them and the magnetic uncoupling feature, too.
Mine were, I think, actually the version which followed the one in your picture, as all of mine included a coil spring for centering purposes - mine, in the photo below, would have had the metal piece, shown in your drawing, inside the coil spring....
I still have some in use on some of my MoW cars, minus the pins.
Wayne,
Now that's a well-weathered coupler. Kadees can last just about forever if the environment is favorable. Sometimes I think it's not really appeciated how far we've come in a few decades. Or how lucky it was that Kadee had a solid design and a stable manufacturing environment under good management. Standardization was generally a good thing on the railroad and in the model world, too.
There are about half a dozen nice cars that are apparently built-up Mantua Metals kits - all with hook-and-loops. Yes, Kadees were a little too luxurious at the time, but the presence of a solitary envelope seems to mark an aspiration that better times were ahead. Alas, we don't know what happened to this particular RR in the making, but its cut-off date seems to be 1956, until it surfaced at the show.
doctorwayneI knew these mainly as their K-type, although I don't know if that was ever an official name.
Yes they were "Ks" -- the M in MKD standing for Magnetic. I kind of liked the "slack action" that some of the Kadee types (such as the one in Wayne's photo, and also some of the magnetics, as well as the Varney dummy knuckle couplers) had due to that spring. As you can see it would compress to a point when shoved. The popular #5s (or as they were known at first, the #5/#10) lacked that spring-based slack action. As soon as freight car trucks became more free rolling however that same slack action became somewhat annoying, as a train would look like a Slinky toy shifting back and forth. The slack action worked better with trucks that had some drag to them.
Dave Nelson
Not to hijack the thread except briefly: can someone comment on the tech and history of the 'drop in fluid-drive conversion' mentioned on the envelope?
They are Varney steam engines diecast metal.With a big plastic gear underneath the engine.Between the wheels what is that for the gear?
Overmod Not to hijack the thread except briefly: can someone comment on the tech and history of the 'drop in fluid-drive conversion' mentioned on the envelope?
MetrolinkFan They are Varney steam engines diecast metal.With a big plastic gear underneath the engine.Between the wheels what is that for the gear?
doctorwayne Despite being a fairly early user of Kadee couplers (1956), I've never heard of their "fluid drive conversion", but have submitted a query to Sam the Answer Man, at Kadee, regarding this. If I get a reply, I'll post it here, but I've also invited him to chime-in if he wishes. Wayne
I got a very prompt reply, as usual, from Sam at Kadee. Here's his response concerning both the coupler package shown in Mike's post, and the reference to "the snap-on fluid drive units":
"The coupler package is one of our very first marketable couplers designs. Kadee officially began in 1946 and that coupler came along soon after and that was long before we started to use product numbers. We had several couplers that were on the market long before the common #5 was developed.Also, the Kadee "Snap-on fluid drive units" was a simple cyndrical torque converted that helped to control the momentum of the loco during acceleration. Apparently back in those days transformer throttles were not very smooth or fine tuned. The fluid drive contained oil that you could change the weight (SAE) that would change the momentum speeds. The product really didn't last long as electrical technology was getting better that modernized the throttles being used."
Here are my Ho Diecast metal Ho Steam Engines,I think they are Varney Mantuas.Hope the link works.If someone can tell me how much they are woth Thanks.
https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/my-drive
MetrolinkFan Here are my Ho Diecast metal Ho Steam Engines,I think they are Varney Mantuas.Hope the link works.If someone can tell me how much they are woth Thanks. https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/my-drive
Diecast metal engines were made by TYCO/Mantua, MDC/Roundhouse, Aristocraft, Varney, Penn line, Bowser, and Sakura(PFM).
Some price points for operating engines:
TYCO Mantua, Varney and Penn line engines sell for around $20-40
MDC/roundhouse engines sell for around $40-60
Bowser, Sakura, and diecast PFM Engines sell for around $70-100
Like always, there are exceptions.
They may not be valuable on their own, but sell them together, and you can make some money! Good thing about these diecast engines, they're built like tanks and often just need some soldering or some cleanup to get them running.
Certainly don't them away, if you want to get rid of them, I'll take em!
Charles
PS your link doesn't work. It just brings me to my own drive, not yours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modeling the PRR & NYC in HO
Youtube Channel: www.youtube.com/@trainman440
Instagram (where I share projects!): https://www.instagram.com/trainman440
Wayne, thanks. And please thank Sam for me.
Are they Varney, or Mantua? Anything on the bottom? Pics don't work--you'll have to post on Imgur or flicker or some such place.
Value depends on condition and model you have; I've bought both Varneys and Mantuas for $10-20 at shows.
Gary
Trainman440Diecast metal engines were made by TYCO/Mantua, MDC/Roundhouse, Aristocraft, Varney, Penn line, Bowser, and Sakura(PFM).
You forgot John English....I've had this one since the mid-'50s, but I believe it's somewhat older than that...
It runs nicely, still with its original open frame motor, but I plan to update it with a can motor and NWSL gearbox, along with new drivers from Greenway, as the original brass drivers are in constant need of cleaning....one of eight steam locos awaiting rebuilding.Here's the John English Pacific in its current state...
Fluid drives and clutch systems were popular int he 50's. There are ads for several makes in old MRs. There may have even been a DIY article on makign one, if I recall correctly.
--Randy
Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's
Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.
rrinkerFluid drives and clutch systems were popular int he 50's. There are ads for several makes in old MRs. There may have even been a DIY article on makign one,
Is there any more information on the fluid drives and clutches?
The idea has captured my curiosity.
-Kevin
Living the dream.
Simon, thanks for your response.
I have an old (50+ years) Manta Pacific that I hung onto for years because it has strong sentimental value. I ran it years ago when I first got it, and after more years of storage just hung onto it thinking it was just something for a shelf.
When I finally began building my layout, a freelancer, I needed a fleet of passenger steamers. Looking at that old Pacific I thought it would be good to use it as a basis for building that fleet, even though some work would be involved. So I rooted around the web, and now own six of those old engines, all at or nearing completion of overhauls, upgrades and new livery. I have three more, that I got for parts.
If I had gone with new locos instead, I'd have a few $grand invested instead of a few $hundred. I would have also had to forego the pleasure (yeah, I'm one of those guys. . . ) of breaking these down into workable projects, learning how to do what was needed, and then getting to actually do it. I have learned a great deal, my original steamer (the one having sentimental value) now holds pride of place as the lead locomotive in a fleet that is key to operating my railroad, and I am very proud of what I was able to do. The original and its later sisters were nice looking, heavy-duty, and now have new leases on life as dependable, sound decoder-equipped key players.
Everything I learned, every challenge surmounted, has had a wonderfully positive impact all over my railroad.
SeeYou190 rrinker Fluid drives and clutch systems were popular int he 50's. There are ads for several makes in old MRs. There may have even been a DIY article on makign one, Is there any more information on the fluid drives and clutches? The idea has captured my curiosity. -Kevin
rrinker Fluid drives and clutch systems were popular int he 50's. There are ads for several makes in old MRs. There may have even been a DIY article on makign one,
Page 50, December 1950 MR is an article that explains how they work. The example shown has 2 paddle wheels in an oil filled chanmber. One driven by the motor, the other driving the gears.
Hello Railfans!
navyman636 Everything I learned, every challenge surmounted, has had a wonderfully positive impact all over my railroad.
Thus, the addage - "Model Railroading is FUN!". An altruism that will never die.
Very NICE photos above folks!
Happy Holidays!
Douglas
PM Railfan