Login
or
Register
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Home
»
Model Railroader
»
Forums
»
General Discussion (Model Railroader)
»
Locomotive Servicing Facility
Locomotive Servicing Facility
1360 views
3 replies
Order Ascending
Order Descending
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Locomotive Servicing Facility
Posted by
Anonymous
on Thursday, December 30, 2004 4:46 PM
I am working on a model of a modern locomotive servicing facility with tracks for sanding, refueling, inspection, etc. My question is what code of rail to use? Does anyone have any input on the typical weight of rail used in loco servicing areas? The photos I have of the prototype are from a low angle and perpindicular to the tracks, so you can't tell the height of the rail. Any suggestions?
Brant
Reply
Edit
Jetrock
Member since
August 2003
From: Midtown Sacramento
3,340 posts
Posted by
Jetrock
on Thursday, December 30, 2004 5:27 PM
It depends on the facility, but for modern facilities Code 83 would be appropriate--that would match current heavyweight rail fairly closely. Code 70 would also work fine.
Since the difference in actual rail thickness between Code 83 and Code 100 is .017", about 1.5 scale inches, at least to my eyes they don't look all that different. The best way to "shrink" the apparent size of your rail is to paint the sides (I airbru***he rails and ties, then scrape the paint off the tops with a block of wood and touch up with a Bright Boy) to kill any shine. Rails become much less apparent when so treated.
Reply
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Sunday, January 2, 2005 9:44 PM
Thanks for the imput. I originally bought code 83, but I am leaning toward 70. I am planning on using 70 in the rest of the yard, so it might look a little more believable if they are the same.
Reply
Edit
BRAKIE
Member since
October 2001
From: OH
17,574 posts
Posted by
BRAKIE
on Monday, January 3, 2005 9:21 AM
IMHO Code 70 would be better with the ties buried..Unless its a new engine servicing area then code 83 will be better.
Larry
Conductor.
Summerset Ry.
"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt Safety First!"
Reply
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Users Online
There are no community member online
Search the Community
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter
See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter
and get model railroad news in your inbox!
Sign up