Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Kansas City Southern Thrall Built 150 Ton 75 Foot Coal Gondola Kitbash

4188 views
47 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Saturday, July 28, 2018 3:52 PM

The vertical walls of the sides are mostly what acts to keep the body from bending.  This is why so many flatcars have fishbelly underframes, and so many gondolas do not.

 

It IS a long car.  Making the top chord heavier would likely handle it.  Also it would be good to have some ties between the two top chords.

MAYBE thicken the side sheets by 1/16", which would add 4500 pounds to the car weight.

 

Ed

 

 

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • 2,980 posts
Posted by NWP SWP on Saturday, July 28, 2018 4:14 PM

This is what I'm going for.

Steve

If everything seems under control, you're not going fast enough!

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Saturday, July 28, 2018 4:40 PM

Steven,

I don't think I'd do it the way you're talking about (You, obviously, CAN.).

I think I'd raise the section above the trucks.  That would create a look similar to the photo.  All the vertical ribs would go down to the bottom of the side.  The problem/irritation, though, is that model won't have the same height as the prototype--it will be lower.

Also, if I moved the floor of the car upwards (about a foot, it looks like), then I would build a whole new floor in that area, and the coupler and truck mounting would then be replaced in a manner that suited me.

I think my approach would produce a car that looks more like the prototype than yours does.  But, then, I'm not totally knowing exactly where you're going.  I just somehow have doubts about grafting a flatcar onto the bottom.

Ed

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • 2,980 posts
Posted by NWP SWP on Saturday, July 28, 2018 8:43 PM

Seems like an easy thing, sand down the flat car deck and sides and glue the gondola shell onto that, what is your concern with that idea? Perhaps you're seeing something I'm missing.

The tough part is going to be making the "struts" or braces on the sides of the flat car and on its underside, I guess use styrene strip in the dimensions of the original braces?

The flat car is going to be a good fit because the sideframes are 1.25" across and the gondola shell is that at the bottom from each side, not including the braces.

If you're worried about the joint lines not looking good I'm planning to rattle can paint the cars anyways so those minute details will get covered to a degree.

Steve

If everything seems under control, you're not going fast enough!

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • 2,980 posts
Posted by NWP SWP on Saturday, July 28, 2018 8:52 PM

I think that using a flat car would be simpler than fabricating my own underframe or lowering the car (which isn't ideal because the car is short now so lowering it would make it look too short.)

My styrene cutting isn't the best yet either so I can make basic shapes but even they're a little wacky.

Steve

If everything seems under control, you're not going fast enough!

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Saturday, July 28, 2018 10:14 PM

NWP SWP

Seems like an easy thing, sand down the flat car deck and sides and glue the gondola shell onto that, what is your concern with that idea? Perhaps you're seeing something I'm missing.

The tough part is going to be making the "struts" or braces on the sides of the flat car and on its underside, I guess use styrene strip in the dimensions of the original braces?

Yup, that's it.  Extending the ribs downwards.  IF you can do that cleanly, that's good.  Because it will make the car body taller, which was a concern of mine.

If you're worried about the joint lines not looking good I'm planning to rattle can paint the cars anyways so those minute details will get covered to a degree.

 

"Minute", indeed.  20-40 years from now, dig this car out and re-evaluate the work. But we all gotta start somewhere.  And here you are.

Back to work, dude.

 

 

Ed

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • From: Southern Florida Gulf Coast
  • 18,255 posts
Posted by SeeYou190 on Sunday, July 29, 2018 8:10 AM

NWP SWP
Seems like an easy thing, sand down the flat car deck and sides and glue the gondola shell onto that, what is your concern with that idea? Perhaps you're seeing something I'm missing.

.

I think we are all seeing something you are missing, but do not let that stop you. Maybe you can make it work. Maybe it will not work. Either way you will learn a lot. Keep working.

.

NWP SWP
If you're worried about the joint lines not looking good I'm planning to rattle can paint the cars anyways so those minute details will get covered to a degree.

.

Have you painted this car yet? If not, break out the rattle can and get to it. I really want to see it finished.

.

-Kevin

.

Living the dream.

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • From: Southern Florida Gulf Coast
  • 18,255 posts
Posted by SeeYou190 on Sunday, July 29, 2018 8:12 AM

NWP SWP

This is what I'm going for.

 

.

Do you have any other pictures of the car? A straight on side view will help a lot.

.

-Kevin

.

Living the dream.

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 8,892 posts
Posted by riogrande5761 on Sunday, July 29, 2018 8:15 AM

NWP SWP

My plan as far as the body is to basically take the gondola, THE GONDOLA, it has a flat bottom! Cut as I did before but instead of using the stock underframes I glue it onto a flat car also cut to length.

The side sill and stuff will be sanded off the flat car so that it blends in with the gondola.

 

Butchering a Rio Grande hi side gon?  Heresy I say! 

Rio Grande.  The Action Road  - Focus 1977-1983

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • 2,980 posts
Posted by NWP SWP on Sunday, July 29, 2018 8:51 AM

Sadly I have not been able to attain a photo from a perpendicular angle, the are some at sharper angles to the car, but 99% of those photos are of the cars in woodchip service with either their 3 axle trucks removed and replaced by 2 axle trucks, 75% of the photos are this, and the remaining few are of the extended side ones with their 3axle trucks.

 

Steve

If everything seems under control, you're not going fast enough!

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • 2,980 posts
Posted by NWP SWP on Friday, March 22, 2019 11:26 PM

So long time between posts but I finally got around to messing with the car again, I ended up shortening a 89 foot TOFC flat to around 76 feet then attached the gondola body it looks pretty decent, tonight I relocated the bolsters and mounted the trucks, I'm experiencing derailment issues with the triaxle Buckeye trucks, seems the middle wheelset is acting as a teetering point, I'm thinking a 28" wheelset for the center axle and the 36" outer wheelsets will prevent the teetering.

Next project is possibly making the braces extend to the bottom of the car.

I think I've mentioned it before but one of the guys at the club who is really big into KCS built the high side woodchip version of the car, the way he built his was he started with a woodchip gon, filed down the external braces and then replaced them with strip styrene ones, he didn't go so far as to drop the center of the car and all that he just did the flat bottom.

He also said some other guys he knows have tried scratch building the depressed center but usually got close enough and called it good and then never made another car, I intend to build at least a 12 car train for the club, this prototyping phase has taken longer but it will allow me to do the next one to a level that will not only be a close replica but also be able to be resin molded, a friend has all the resin casting stuff.

Heres the car before relocating the bolsters and mounting the trucks,

To do it the "right" way I probably wouldn't bother with the depressed center right now but rather take the crossbracing off the underframe then come in with strip styrene to extend the bracing under the car, or alternately (depending on how much money and work I want to put in) I could take two of the TOFC underframes, cut all the bracing off then mount one on each side edge of the car then strip styrene ro extend the bracing.

I'm leaning more towards the first choice because between the C beam profile of the side of the TOFC frame and the center frame I think with the braces ran all the way down the car will look pretty good, not an exact copy but a reasonable facsimile thereof with some modelers licence applied.

What do you guys think?

Steve

If everything seems under control, you're not going fast enough!

  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: SE. WI.
  • 8,253 posts
Posted by mbinsewi on Saturday, March 23, 2019 7:01 AM

Right now, it looks like the upper structure of a high side gon, sitting on a flat car.  Wouldn't scratch building a bottom,  or using the bottom of the "donor" cars work better? instead of re-working flat cars?

I can see not going with the drop center, but with the bottom of the "donor" cars, it would maintain the high side gon "look". 

Just my thoughts,

Mike.

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • 2,980 posts
Posted by NWP SWP on Saturday, March 23, 2019 4:31 PM

Mike, thanks for your thoughts, by the "donor" car bottoms do you mean the roundhouse thrall coal gondola underframes?

You're not the only one that has said that, I think the orange paint is contributing to this, my next project will be extending the bracing onto the flatcar, perhaps that will solve the gon on flatcar appearance, perhaps not, we shall see!

Steve

If everything seems under control, you're not going fast enough!

  • Member since
    March 2012
  • 716 posts
Posted by trwroute on Saturday, March 23, 2019 5:09 PM

I also think that you need to ditch the flat car.  I thought you were going for a prototypical look?

Chuck - Modeling in HO scale and anything narrow gauge

  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: SE. WI.
  • 8,253 posts
Posted by mbinsewi on Saturday, March 23, 2019 7:44 PM

NWP SWP
the roundhouse thrall coal gondola underframes?

Yes.

Mike.

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • 2,980 posts
Posted by NWP SWP on Saturday, March 23, 2019 9:31 PM

Ohh ok, yes they were good enough but the problem was 1 they weren't beefy enough to go with the length of the car and they didn't line up right with the side braces, like I said this car is a prototype, hence an experiment, I think I'll try extending the braces down and painting the car all the same color and see if that makes a difference! Thanks for the input though guys!

Steve

If everything seems under control, you're not going fast enough!

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • From: Southern Florida Gulf Coast
  • 18,255 posts
Posted by SeeYou190 on Saturday, March 23, 2019 9:44 PM

To me, it does not look anything like the prototype. It looks like way-too-heavy of a load added to a relatively light flat car.

.

Time to forget about KCS, and paint it up for NSWP instead.

.

-Kevin

.

Living the dream.

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • 2,980 posts
Posted by NWP SWP on Saturday, March 23, 2019 10:11 PM

I'll be picking up some .060x.125 and .060x.250 styrene strip to extend the bracing layer this week, it might work and won't look like a gon on flat or itll look like a heavy gondola, either way I'll find out!

Steve

If everything seems under control, you're not going fast enough!

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!