Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Crossings

1866 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2017
  • 2 posts
Crossings
Posted by jberti on Wednesday, December 20, 2017 10:25 AM

In laying my track I used a couple of Atlas re-railers, which also act as grade crossings.  I am torn between removing them or trying to make them more realistic looking for a railroad set in the steam to diesel transition era.  So I thought I would see what other modelers think. Would you remove or keep them?  If your opinion is to keep them do you know where I might get a video or article on how to make them look more realistic?    

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 868 posts
Posted by davidmurray on Wednesday, December 20, 2017 3:26 PM

Secondart lines in transition era had many wooden highway crossings.  Paint and weather as you feel appropiate.  My objection is that at nine inches they would match four lanes much better than two.  Unless there are shorter one availible.

Dave

 

David Murray from Oshawa, Ontario Canada
  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: SE. WI.
  • 8,253 posts
Posted by mbinsewi on Wednesday, December 20, 2017 3:34 PM

I also think you can paint and weather them to be a very convincing grade crossing.

When I first started, that's what I thought they were!  Grade cossings that did a great job of rerailing cars.  Laugh  After all, they have the look of planks molded right in.

Mike.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,333 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Wednesday, December 20, 2017 9:42 PM

What do you use to make your roads?  It's probably best to carry that right up to the rail heads.  I like these Blair Line crossings:

The roads are made of Durham's Water Putty.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    July 2017
  • 201 posts
Posted by marksrailroad on Wednesday, December 20, 2017 9:46 PM

I'd say keep what you've got and maybe weather them a bit. I've got the same crossing/rerailers and they work too well to remove them...

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • From: Southern Florida Gulf Coast
  • 18,255 posts
Posted by SeeYou190 on Wednesday, December 20, 2017 11:34 PM

Welcome to the forums. Your first few posts will be delayed by moderators, but that will be over soon.

.

I vote to keep them, and weather them.

.

They look better than Kato's rerailers/grade crossings!

.

.

-Kevin

.

Living the dream.

  • Member since
    November 2015
  • 1,340 posts
Posted by ATSFGuy on Wednesday, December 20, 2017 11:48 PM

If you can, turn them into an active grade crossing, pave a road through them from one end to the other, add lights, gates, an electrical box off to the side, repaint the lines on the road and add some vehicles behind the crossing gates.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southeast Texas
  • 5,437 posts
Posted by mobilman44 on Thursday, December 21, 2017 7:50 AM

Hi,

All good ideas above for sure!  I first got them in the early 1960s, and with the first permanant layout weathered them with a black/brown wash and glued ground cover on each end to "narrow" the roadway.

BTW, these rerailers are terrific for staging tracks and other areas out of sight.

ENJOY  !

 

Mobilman44

 

Living in southeast Texas, formerly modeling the "postwar" Santa Fe and Illinois Central 

  • Member since
    March 2015
  • 1,358 posts
Posted by SouthPenn on Thursday, December 21, 2017 8:38 AM

You might want to install them in tunnels. Could save you a lot of grief if a car derails inside. 

South Penn
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 3,139 posts
Posted by chutton01 on Thursday, December 21, 2017 9:20 AM

SeeYou190
I vote to keep them, and weather them.

They look better than Kato's rerailers/grade crossings!

-Kevin


Those look more like Jersey barriers closing off a grade crossing than a concrete grade crossing...

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • From: Richmond, VA
  • 1,890 posts
Posted by carl425 on Thursday, December 21, 2017 9:52 AM

jberti
I am torn between removing them or trying to make them more realistic looking for a railroad set in the steam to diesel transition era.

You answered your own question.  You are obviously dissatisfied with the unrealistic appearance of them.  Rip them out and replace them with something that looks better.

As others have suggested, they're great for hidden track.  That's the only place I use them.

I have the right to remain silent.  By posting here I have given up that right and accept that anything I say can and will be used as evidence to critique me.

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • From: Southern California
  • 1,682 posts
Posted by Lone Wolf and Santa Fe on Thursday, December 21, 2017 11:36 AM

The straight tracks look better than the curved ones because the curved ones have the electrical connection. You can paint the straight ones to match the road on the sides and paint the center section wood color with lots of oil stains and tire marks. If they are curved use them in a tunnel or staging area.

Modeling a fictional version of California set in the 1990s Lone Wolf and Santa Fe Railroad

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!