Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Easy Question: Difference between plain Testor and Model Master?

6386 views
8 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 3,139 posts
Easy Question: Difference between plain Testor and Model Master?
Posted by chutton01 on Friday, October 1, 2004 2:59 PM
That's it, what is the difference between plain Testor's and Model Masters paints (especially spray paints) to warrent a dollar or so price difference?
Particular in regards to the same colors (say, gloss white or gloss black) - I realize many specific colors are only in one or the other product range, but some are the same or similar.
  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: NW Central IND.
  • 326 posts
Posted by easyaces on Friday, October 1, 2004 3:09 PM
Plain testors paint is a little thicker and needs a lot of thinning for good airbrushing where ther model-master paint is formulated more for easier arbrushing and gives better coating.
MR&L(Muncie,Rochester&Lafayette)"Serving the Hoosier Triangle" "If you lost it in the Hoosier Triangle, We probably shipped it " !!
  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: Columbus, OH
  • 492 posts
Posted by dano99a on Friday, October 1, 2004 4:05 PM
above and $$$

DANO
C&O lives on!!!  
Visit my railfan community site: http://www.crtraincrew.com

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, October 1, 2004 7:28 PM
Extra bonus for me (and all the folks using a Binks airbrush) The bottle fits right on the airbrush!!! Empties can be cleaned out and used as spare paint cups!
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Texas
  • 155 posts
Posted by Sunset Limited on Saturday, October 2, 2004 7:03 PM
I was wondering about that also! I heard from a hobby shop employee that there is no difference between the Tester Model Master flat dull cote and the Tester dull cote 1260 spray paints. ( There both lacquer paints) I'm taking their word on it since I tried them both, and I see no difference in painted appearance or quality. Now I'm using the cheaper standard Tester dull cote can.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, October 2, 2004 10:13 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by EZamora

I was wondering about that also! I heard from a hobby shop employee that there is no difference between the Tester Model Master flat dull cote and the Tester dull cote 1260 spray paints. ( There both lacquer paints) I'm taking their word on it since I tried them both, and I see no difference in painted appearance or quality. Now I'm using the cheaper standard Tester dull cote can.

Careful there. Testors Dullcoat in a can has talc in it as a flattening agent, and the mixture consistency varies. Either its not mixed enough, or too much talc in it, the resilt is an occasional model that turns white. I swore off the stuff years ago, preferring to shoot Floquil flat fini***hrough the airbrush. Much more consistent results!
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 3,139 posts
Posted by chutton01 on Saturday, October 2, 2004 10:32 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by kbfcsme
Careful there. Testors Dullcoat in a can has talc in it as a flattening agent, and the mixture consistency varies. Either its not mixed enough, or too much talc in it, the resilt is an occasional model that turns white. I swore off the stuff years ago, preferring to shoot Floquil flat fini***hrough the airbrush. Much more consistent results!

Testors Dullcoat (in a can) especially does not like any surfaces with Alcohol on them (as I once found to my dismay a long time ago, having cleaned some models with alcohol and then dullcoating them after they dried - oops). I limit my dullcoat spray usage to flat, kinda rough objects such as people (I hate sleek, shiney, people), scrap metal piles, abandoned burned vehicles, etc - things that kinda have a crappy finish in nature (and prototype people do seem to have rougher, flatter finishes than, say, your average auto or SUV - even the sexiest Hollywood Starlet...).
Anyway, thanks for the replies - the consensus so far is trending that in a bottle form, Straight Testors is thicker than Model Master (I definitely concur), and in a spray form there seems to be no difference except cost (this I knew), and color range - but there may or may not be differences in the flat clear coats (for some reason I believe there is a difference in the gloss clear coats [Model Master just looks better], and anyway my LHS doesn't seem to ever carry Semi-Gloss/Satin Testors -just Model Master Semigloss] - but I am willing to admit I'm wrong here too, and it's just perception on my part)
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 4, 2004 1:34 PM
Ruined a beautiful NYC lightning stripe decal job I did on an HO GP-9, by using Testor Dull Coat. In spite of my shaking the can well, the paint appeared splotchy. Should have stuck with glossy. Will never use it again.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 4, 2004 7:47 PM
My understanding is that the pigment used in the Model Masters series is of a much higher grade and in a larger percentage than the stock Testors. This allows the color to transfer with much less material used and therefore a much thinner coat to achieve the results. I equate Model Master closer to the quality of a Floquil paint.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!