Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Athearn Big Guys on 18" radius.......

1068 views
14 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2002
  • From: Edmonton, Canada
  • 100 posts
Athearn Big Guys on 18" radius.......
Posted by gpharo on Thursday, September 2, 2004 8:54 PM
In my layout I have three loops in a U shape, however my outer loop is 22" radius and the other two are 18" radius. I am considering in buying some big six axle locomotives like an Athearn Dash 9's and/or AC4400 and running them in my outer loop, however due to my location of my engine yard and freight yard I need to pass thru the 18" radius loops before I can get to the outer 22". Can these locos handle a little bit of 18" radius curves.

Thanks



  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Along the Murphy Branch
  • 1,410 posts
Posted by dave9999 on Thursday, September 2, 2004 9:45 PM
Those locos were not really intended for small radius curves. It's kinda like when you
see the "no trucks" signs in a residental area. Too big for the space. I would try to
stick with small deisel and steam power. Or build a layout with wider radius curves.
Dave
  • Member since
    May 2002
  • From: Edmonton, Canada
  • 100 posts
Posted by gpharo on Thursday, September 2, 2004 11:30 PM
[?]Would 22" inch radius track with Peco Setrack switches (18" radius) be good enough for the Athearn Dash-9's or AC4400 to run well?


Thanks

gp_haro
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, September 3, 2004 1:52 AM
i ono about the athearn dash 9s, but on my layout we have a mix of 22" and 18" and we have some athearn C-C U-boats, and an F-45. those are fine on the 22". they can some times do ok on the 18" (as in not derailing) but if the slightest thing is wrong wiht the track or the wheels are a lil outa gaduge then its off the rails for them. so yeah, if your were just gonna opperate them on the out side that would work id say, but the 18"s are really pushing it. just my oppinion
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Midtown Sacramento
  • 3,340 posts
Posted by Jetrock on Friday, September 3, 2004 2:19 AM
A "little bit"? Is that like being a "little bit pregnant"?

Dash-9's seem like they would be a little big to handle such curves. If you want to run big iron, use big curves is all I can say...if you want tight radius curves, there are plenty of smaller engines that can handle them just fine, and plenty of prototypes, even today, where you can see said engines in business.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, September 3, 2004 3:59 AM
The Athearn SD-2, Atlas SD 24, 35 & U30C will operate on 18".
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Whitby, ON
  • 2,594 posts
Posted by CP5415 on Friday, September 3, 2004 5:23 AM
All Athearn 6 axle BB locomotives will work fine through 18" curves.
I have several of these locomotives & have never had a problem with those curves.

Gordon

Brought to you by the letters C.P.R. as well as D&H!

 K1a - all the way

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Friday, September 3, 2004 7:05 AM
As bad as it may look to use these trains on 18" radius curves, mechanically they should be just fine. 18" is the minimum standard for 90% of all HO trains made.
  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Friday, September 3, 2004 8:42 AM
I fully agree with Big Boy..90% of our locomotives will go around a 18" curve..You see they was built to do just that.They may not look pretty doing it nor do I recommend 6 axle units on 18" curves..

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Crosby, Texas
  • 3,660 posts
Posted by cwclark on Friday, September 3, 2004 9:40 AM
I can speak from experience but an athearn GE dash -8, GE u33c, EMD SD-50 or an AC4400 will not work on an 18" radius...my last layout had 15" and 18" radius and the above locomotives went into a box for years until i built my new layout after I watched them go off the track at each bend ...my new layout has nothing less than 26" radius so there is no doubt the engines will run...I missed those loco's for years!...Chuck[:D]

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, September 3, 2004 9:42 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Big_Boy_4005

mechanically they should be just fine. 18" is the minimum standard for 90% of all HO trains made.

Sure the loco will but what about the first trailing car?
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Alexandria, VA
  • 847 posts
Posted by StillGrande on Friday, September 3, 2004 9:50 AM
locomotive3 is right. I had a problem on a club layout with the lead loco pulling the trailing unit off the track. The couplers did not have enough travel and would pull the loco or a long following (anything over 50' ) car off the track.
Dewey "Facts are meaningless; you can use facts to prove anything that is even remotely true! Facts, schmacks!" - Homer Simpson "The problem is there are so many stupid people and nothing eats them."
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Friday, September 3, 2004 12:29 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by StillGrande

locomotive3 is right. I had a problem on a club layout with the lead loco pulling the trailing unit off the track. The couplers did not have enough travel and would pull the loco or a long following (anything over 50' ) car off the track.


Kadee couplers or horn hooks? Coupler swing issues are a function of car length only, not wheel base or wheel arrangement. You may need to modify the coupler pocket to allow for the tighter curves.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, September 3, 2004 2:28 PM
I can say that their Dash 9, AC4400, SD40-2 and SD40T-2 will handle 18in radius - I have run them on Hornby 3rd radius curves which are about 18in and they were ok, though they would behave better on more gentle curves - I only used this circuit for testing purposes. I did find that replacing the metal strip across the top of the motor (that carries power from the trucks to the motor) with fine, flexible wire helps with both trackholding and reliable current collection - it seems to give the trucks more freedom to move. Hope this helps!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, September 4, 2004 6:28 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Big_Boy_4005

QUOTE: Originally posted by StillGrande

locomotive3 is right. I had a problem on a club layout with the lead loco pulling the trailing unit off the track. The couplers did not have enough travel and would pull the loco or a long following (anything over 50' ) car off the track.


Kadee couplers or horn hooks? Coupler swing issues are a function of car length only, not wheel base or wheel arrangement. You may need to modify the coupler pocket to allow for the tighter curves.


KD makes over 40 different couplers and conversion kits/brackets for many-many different applications that also allow for greater coupler lateral extended swing and permits the negotiation of 18" radius curves such as the 453/454 close coupling swing brackets.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!