Ray Breyer
Modeling the NKP's Peoria Division, circa 1943
"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"
EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION
http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588
QUOTE: Originally posted by cjm89 WHAT? No road numbers of a CB&Q 2-10-2? Or even Santa Fe? It was known as the Santa Fe type after all, how come the railroads west of the Mississsippi but east (Talking about Midwest here, not the ATSF now) of the Rockies nver get any good steamers out for them?!
Larry
http://www.youtube.com/user/ClinchValleySD40
http://www.flickr.com/photos/52481330@N05/
http://www.trainboard.com/railimages/showgallery.php/cat/500/page/1/ppuser/8745/sl/c
QUOTE: Originally posted by orsonroy QUOTE: Originally posted by cjm89 WHAT? No road numbers of a CB&Q 2-10-2? Or even Santa Fe? It was known as the Santa Fe type after all, how come the railroads west of the Mississsippi but east (Talking about Midwest here, not the ATSF now) of the Rockies nver get any good steamers out for them?! Chris, The problem with the USRA 2-10-2 is that it was the best non-Superpower steamer built. This means it wasn't flashy or fast, and was built during the age of drag freights. Superpower was designed partially to fight off competition from other transportation systems, and the best drag freight engine ever couldn't do that. So the 2-10-2s got largely overlooked. Frankly, I like 'em. Two of my favorite roads, the IC and C&IM, were lousy with these engines, and I plan on modeling at least one from each road. I might build a Rock version too, just for fun. Unfortunately, the Q had a very "distinctive" (goofy?) look to their engine designs, so I'm not too sure you'll be able to pull off one of their engines with this model.
QUOTE: Originally posted by EL PARRo I wish someone would make a UP 2-10-2... I suppose if this 2-10-2 isn't too diferent from the ones that UP used, I could get an unlettered one and letter it for UP. I'd probably have to get a Vanderbilt tender for it though.
QUOTE: Originally posted by nfmisso QUOTE: Originally posted by EL PARRo I wish someone would make a UP 2-10-2... I suppose if this 2-10-2 isn't too diferent from the ones that UP used, I could get an unlettered one and letter it for UP. I'd probably have to get a Vanderbilt tender for it though. The BLI announced ATSF is much closer to the UP locomotive than the forth coming P2K model.
http://www.trainboard.com/railimages/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=5959
If one could roll back the hands of time... They would be waiting for the next train into the future. A. H. Francey 1921-2007
Isambard
Grizzly Northern history, Tales from the Grizzly and news on line at isambard5935.blogspot.com
QUOTE: Originally posted by Isambard Can anyone comment on similarities or otherwise between the USRA 2-10-2's and the CPR's 5800 series 2-10-2 Santa Fe's, used as pushers in the Rockies?
"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"
QUOTE: Originally posted by orsonroy QUOTE: Originally posted by Isambard Can anyone comment on similarities or otherwise between the USRA 2-10-2's and the CPR's 5800 series 2-10-2 Santa Fe's, used as pushers in the Rockies? Well, considering no manufacturer supports you Canadian steam freaks (the jerks), the USRA 2-10-2 is about as close as you're going to get.