Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Life Like to do 2-10-2's, RS-27's and U30B's!!!

2849 views
26 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Life Like to do 2-10-2's, RS-27's and U30B's!!!
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 14, 2004 2:34 PM
http://home.t-online.de/home/all-american-trains/ has all the info on these. they havent been wrong yet. just click on the HO menu and click on the proto 2000 link.


i cant wait....C&EI 2-10-2's!!!!!!!! yay!!!!! [:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Elgin, IL
  • 3,677 posts
Posted by orsonroy on Monday, June 14, 2004 3:19 PM
Interesting....neither proto photo shown is of a USRA engine. (neither the C&O, Wabash nor C&EI had USRA 2-10-2s). This is good news for us modelers who actually NEED the USRA 2-10-2; it's still going to be made by someone else! (hopefully BLI, although it's nice to see that Life Like has figured out that sound is a real trend, and is offering it as an option on these engines)

I still need a couple of the USRA versions for C&IM coal drags!

Ray Breyer

Modeling the NKP's Peoria Division, circa 1943

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 14, 2004 4:18 PM
It'd be nice to get one of those 2-10-2's and bash it into a Lehigh Valley one.
RS27's? Didn't see that one coming at all!?! Very cool though. Now, how about some more Centuries?
C420, C430, C630's w/hi-ad trucks, & C636's!
How about some E44's and E60's?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 14, 2004 5:27 PM
that is a strange pick for the 2-10-2. i know all of the C&EI units went to the C&O and i think the Wabash units may have come from one of them, or from the same order.

it's great that the Chicago & Eastern Illinois railroad is starting to get some respect! we have the Atlas RS1's and GP7's and the Athearn 2-8-2's, Stewart F3's, BLI E7's and now some 2-10-2's.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 14, 2004 5:28 PM
oh...by the way N scalers, Life Like is going to be doing the GP60's in N scale too!!
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: United States of America, Tennessee, Cookeville
  • 408 posts
Posted by Allen Jenkins on Monday, June 14, 2004 7:58 PM
Thanks Night Crawler, that's the link of the day! I wanna' Tennessee Central RS36's. acj.
Allen/Backyard
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 14, 2004 8:06 PM
WHAT?

No road numbers of a CB&Q 2-10-2? Or even Santa Fe?

It was known as the Santa Fe type after all, how come the railroads west of the Mississsippi but east (Talking about Midwest here, not the ATSF now) of the Rockies nver get any good steamers out for them?!
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Monday, June 14, 2004 8:30 PM
This seems out of left field! I've rarely ever seen these locomotives. But there is enough intrest in them to pass over production of a UP 9000 class! Or DM&IR M-4! Don't make no sense to me. [:0]

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Elgin, IL
  • 3,677 posts
Posted by orsonroy on Tuesday, June 15, 2004 8:27 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by cjm89

WHAT?

No road numbers of a CB&Q 2-10-2? Or even Santa Fe?

It was known as the Santa Fe type after all, how come the railroads west of the Mississsippi but east (Talking about Midwest here, not the ATSF now) of the Rockies nver get any good steamers out for them?!


Chris,

The problem with the USRA 2-10-2 is that it was the best non-Superpower steamer built. This means it wasn't flashy or fast, and was built during the age of drag freights. Superpower was designed partially to fight off competition from other transportation systems, and the best drag freight engine ever couldn't do that. So the 2-10-2s got largely overlooked.

Frankly, I like 'em. Two of my favorite roads, the IC and C&IM, were lousy with these engines, and I plan on modeling at least one from each road. I might build a Rock version too, just for fun. Unfortunately, the Q had a very "distinctive" (goofy?) look to their engine designs, so I'm not too sure you'll be able to pull off one of their engines with this model.

Ray Breyer

Modeling the NKP's Peoria Division, circa 1943

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Holly, MI
  • 1,269 posts
Posted by ClinchValleySD40 on Tuesday, June 15, 2004 9:18 AM
The RS-27 is the really exciting part of this. Finally !!!
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: central Indiana
  • 775 posts
Posted by philnrunt on Tuesday, June 15, 2004 3:04 PM
My my, but that PennCentral RS27 is a good looking little pug nose!
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: California
  • 263 posts
Posted by EL PARRo on Tuesday, June 15, 2004 6:25 PM
I wish someone would make a UP 2-10-2...

I suppose if this 2-10-2 isn't too diferent from the ones that UP used, I could get an unlettered one and letter it for UP. I'd probably have to get a Vanderbilt tender for it though.
huh?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, June 15, 2004 9:34 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by orsonroy

QUOTE: Originally posted by cjm89

WHAT?

No road numbers of a CB&Q 2-10-2? Or even Santa Fe?

It was known as the Santa Fe type after all, how come the railroads west of the Mississsippi but east (Talking about Midwest here, not the ATSF now) of the Rockies nver get any good steamers out for them?!


Chris,

The problem with the USRA 2-10-2 is that it was the best non-Superpower steamer built. This means it wasn't flashy or fast, and was built during the age of drag freights. Superpower was designed partially to fight off competition from other transportation systems, and the best drag freight engine ever couldn't do that. So the 2-10-2s got largely overlooked.

Frankly, I like 'em. Two of my favorite roads, the IC and C&IM, were lousy with these engines, and I plan on modeling at least one from each road. I might build a Rock version too, just for fun. Unfortunately, the Q had a very "distinctive" (goofy?) look to their engine designs, so I'm not too sure you'll be able to pull off one of their engines with this model.


Yeah, the Q liked to modify the handrails and piping on every USRA engine they bought (a pure aggravation for modeling, especially for really delicate models like Proto 2K).

However, you have to admit the Q's Superpower designs were very good looking.
(not so much on the 2-10-4's as the Northerns and Hudson's)
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: San Jose, California
  • 3,154 posts
Posted by nfmisso on Tuesday, June 15, 2004 9:48 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by EL PARRo

I wish someone would make a UP 2-10-2...

I suppose if this 2-10-2 isn't too diferent from the ones that UP used, I could get an unlettered one and letter it for UP. I'd probably have to get a Vanderbilt tender for it though.

The BLI announced ATSF is much closer to the UP locomotive than the forth coming P2K model.
Nigel N&W in HO scale, 1950 - 1955 (..and some a bit newer too) Now in San Jose, California
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: California
  • 263 posts
Posted by EL PARRo on Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:16 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by nfmisso

QUOTE: Originally posted by EL PARRo

I wish someone would make a UP 2-10-2...

I suppose if this 2-10-2 isn't too diferent from the ones that UP used, I could get an unlettered one and letter it for UP. I'd probably have to get a Vanderbilt tender for it though.

The BLI announced ATSF is much closer to the UP locomotive than the forth coming P2K model.


I'll have to check it out when it's released then, although it probably won't fit into my budget for a while.
huh?
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Out on the Briny Ocean Tossed
  • 4,236 posts
Posted by Fergmiester on Wednesday, June 16, 2004 6:12 AM
CN had 4 2-10-2's and if I'm not mistaken were used on the Danforth in Toronto to haul freight from the Downtown yards to the yard north of the city. Dad talks about them as it was yesterday. You could hear them long before you could see them. Especially on a cold crisp clear day in January.

http://www.trainboard.com/railimages/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=5959

If one could roll back the hands of time... They would be waiting for the next train into the future. A. H. Francey 1921-2007  

  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Monday, June 28, 2004 12:21 AM
In the MR news letter it said P2K announced a USRA 2-10-2. Who is right?

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Wisconsin
  • 228 posts
Posted by MRTerry on Monday, June 28, 2004 8:11 AM
I called Life-Like myself, and they say it's a USRA 2-10-2.
Thanks,
Terry
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Elgin, IL
  • 3,677 posts
Posted by orsonroy on Monday, June 28, 2004 9:25 AM
Thanks for the clarification Terry. So they ARE going to do a USRA heavy 2-10-2, and no the engines highlighted by the "German site".

Oh well, at least I'll be able to model the C&IM and IC after all!

Ray Breyer

Modeling the NKP's Peoria Division, circa 1943

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canada, eh!
  • 737 posts
Posted by Isambard on Monday, June 28, 2004 9:44 AM
Can anyone comment on similarities or otherwise between the USRA 2-10-2's and the CPR's 5800 series 2-10-2 Santa Fe's, used as pushers in the Rockies?

Isambard

Grizzly Northern history, Tales from the Grizzly and news on line at  isambard5935.blogspot.com 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 30, 2004 10:41 AM
VERY informative!!! I like the RS-27s, but not 'til 2006?!? OUCH!!! Why don't the manufacturers have this info available, though??? Oh well, time to start saving those pennies...[8D]
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Elgin, IL
  • 3,677 posts
Posted by orsonroy on Wednesday, June 30, 2004 11:50 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Isambard

Can anyone comment on similarities or otherwise between the USRA 2-10-2's and the CPR's 5800 series 2-10-2 Santa Fe's, used as pushers in the Rockies?


Well, considering no manufacturer supports you Canadian steam freaks (the jerks), the USRA 2-10-2 is about as close as you're going to get. I did a quick search online, and came up with one photo of 5811:
http://www.rr-fallenflags.org/cp/cp-s5811ark.jpg

Compare her to a pretty stock USRA heavy 2-10-2:
http://www.rr-fallenflags.org/cbq/cs-s909.jpg

Mostly, the valve gear hangers are wrong, as is the cab. Everything else is pretty minor detailing work. I think you could pull off a pretty convincing 5800-series engine with a USRA to start with (but don't tell the purists!)

Ray Breyer

Modeling the NKP's Peoria Division, circa 1943

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,633 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Wednesday, June 30, 2004 1:30 PM
At last, someone is producing a GE U-Boat, with sound! Looking forward to it. For those that remember, the prototypes were LOUD! U-Boats at full throttle could be heard several miles away. I hope that QSI accurately captured the sound! Looking forward to it.

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 30, 2004 4:15 PM
Looks like a swell engine, but I don't think I'll be very willing to pay the hundreds of dollars it's gonna cost... how big a pricetag do you imagine for these?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 30, 2004 8:13 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by orsonroy

QUOTE: Originally posted by Isambard

Can anyone comment on similarities or otherwise between the USRA 2-10-2's and the CPR's 5800 series 2-10-2 Santa Fe's, used as pushers in the Rockies?


Well, considering no manufacturer supports you Canadian steam freaks (the jerks), the USRA 2-10-2 is about as close as you're going to get.
You got something against Canadian Steam enthusiasts[:(!][:0]!? (not jerks)
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Elgin, IL
  • 3,677 posts
Posted by orsonroy on Thursday, July 1, 2004 7:45 AM
NO! The jerks are the manufacturers! I don't model Canadian steam, but I've spent many hundreds of miles riding behind it (mostly 6060), and would love to have a few (inexpensive) models of my favorite Canadian engines.

Ray Breyer

Modeling the NKP's Peoria Division, circa 1943

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 130 posts
Posted by the-big-blow on Thursday, July 1, 2004 12:35 PM
RS-27's. Why would anyone want that swill in anything but brass is beyond me. Lets see why don't they make a C855, Dh 643 while their at it. Oh wait I own one of them in brass and its very doubtful anything plastic could compare. My message is this with all the interesting models that could be made, why these models. What compelled them to announce an RS-27. Probably somebodys favorite locomotive not to mention the tooling costs to be astronomical. (Or so I've been told) Now I don't hate Alco's (better quality century series would be very welcome). Another classic example of a model that makes very little to no sense. Definately a non buyer even though they'll probably make them in UP.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!