Login
or
Register
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Home
»
Model Railroader
»
Forums
»
General Discussion (Model Railroader)
»
FEBRUARY UPDATE> MIKE'S TRAIN HOUSE DCC LAWSUIT
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Disclaimer: I am not familiar with DCS, how it works or what its technical similarity is to NMRA DCC. I’m only thinking out loud. <br /> <br />Food for thought: <br /> <br />Could it be argued that MTH’s DCS is actually an implementation of the open-source DCC system as developed, designed and administrated by the NMRA? Extending this thought and running with it, could it not be argued that MTH is illegally charging for what is not their intellectual property? I am using the computer world as a reference in this with LINUX as the example. Companies like Red Hat, SUSE, etc cannot charge for the source code in LINUX, only the value added content and support they supply. So, again, could it be argued that MTH is claiming exclusive rights to patents that include technology that had previously been developed and been part of an open source / public domain technology? Could it be argued that MTH’s DCS is actually only IEEE 802.3 Ethernet transmitted over train rails? <br />
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Users Online
There are no community member online
Search the Community
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter
See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter
and get model railroad news in your inbox!
Sign up