Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

SCALE

914 views
14 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
SCALE
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, January 26, 2004 1:48 PM
Im Sure this question has been asked before but im just in the begining stages of n scale and would love some input on other scales as well

Tim
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Monday, January 26, 2004 2:09 PM
HO is going to be the clear winner here, as in all polls like this.

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, January 26, 2004 2:17 PM
well you missed all the others like HOn3 HOn30, On3, ect....

Jay
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Monday, January 26, 2004 3:06 PM
G and HOn30, sort of an Alpha-Omega thing.

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, January 26, 2004 7:22 PM
HO scale here, though I like S scale, too. N scale allows for more trains and scenery in a smaller space but geez, it's hard on the eyes.[:D]
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: San Jose, California
  • 3,154 posts
Posted by nfmisso on Monday, January 26, 2004 7:27 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by NTDN

well you missed all the others like HOn3 HOn30, On3, ect....

Jay; those are NOT scales, they are narrow guage models within a scale.

Tim: HOn3, etc that you listed are not scales.
Nigel N&W in HO scale, 1950 - 1955 (..and some a bit newer too) Now in San Jose, California
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Along the Murphy Branch
  • 1,410 posts
Posted by dave9999 on Monday, January 26, 2004 8:46 PM
Keep 'em straight Nigel [8D]

HO "scale" here!! Dave
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,204 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Monday, January 26, 2004 9:15 PM
You left out the narrow gauge for S - Sn3, Sn2. I am building an S scale layout and plan to have S and Sn2. I find the size is a good one for viewing and building in a reasonable area (I have an 11x18' train room). I started in HO, tried O and finally settled on S as the best intermediate size. It's more like HO than O in terms of building, but the bigger pieces are a delight. It also seems to have less problems operating than HO - especially in electrical pickup.

But hey, it's all about what you want to do in the space you have available. I originallly drew up track plans for HO, S, and O in my space. My choice was based on having a relatively simple trackplan that allows for watching them roll, with some occaisional switching.

Enjoy
Paul
If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Monday, January 26, 2004 9:55 PM
If you haven't figured it out yet from all of my responses over the last two months, I'll say it again.

3 rail O

and I prefer full scale pieces. [:D][swg] Think Big!!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, January 26, 2004 10:26 PM
Dear Big_Boy_4005,
Me too.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, January 26, 2004 11:34 PM
Thank you For all the input
Tim
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: North Central Illinois
  • 1,458 posts
Posted by CBQ_Guy on Thursday, January 29, 2004 2:02 PM
You forgot TT scale!
"Paul [Kossart] - The CB&Q Guy" [In Illinois] ~ Modeling the CB&Q and its fictional 'Illiniwek River-Subdivision-Branch Line' in the 1960's. ~
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, January 29, 2004 2:14 PM

TT:

Isn't that the one you look at with an electron microscope?

Randy
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, January 29, 2004 3:05 PM
HO is the way to go.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: San Jose, California
  • 3,154 posts
Posted by nfmisso on Thursday, January 29, 2004 3:37 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by rda1964


TT:

Isn't that the one you look at with an electron microscope?

No, TT is 1:120 ; a third larger than N scale.
Nigel N&W in HO scale, 1950 - 1955 (..and some a bit newer too) Now in San Jose, California

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!