Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

will higher start voltage of a dcc sound engine make itrun better at very slow speed?

8813 views
84 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: west coast
  • 7,667 posts
will higher start voltage of a dcc sound engine make itrun better at very slow speed?
Posted by rrebell on Saturday, August 15, 2020 1:41 PM

Kinda wondered as I just hooked up my DCC system and it runs better on DCC at very slow speeds than on DC, ran engines as compatable as I could for comparison and no dual decoder for DC mode.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Saturday, August 15, 2020 2:16 PM

rrebell
Kinda wondered as I just hooked up my DCC system and it runs better on DCC at very slow speeds than on DC, ran engines as compatable as I could for comparison and no dual decoder for DC mode.

Aren't the two functions completely separate?

'Full voltage' to the sound decoder is always there regardless of 'polarity', so it will be 'always on' when commanded.

Meanwhile the slow-speed control is synthesized in the motor-control decoder and is not affected by anything about the DCC track voltage.  Expect it to be 'tunable' across the 128 nominal steps and to be reasonably high frequency and therefore 'kind' to motors turning very slowly.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Saturday, August 15, 2020 3:14 PM

 It's a little different with DCC. If the loco doesn't start moving until you get to speed step 10, for example, then you only have a range of control from 10-126 (for technical reasons explained in the NMRA DCC specifications if you are curious, the "128 step" mode is really 126 steps, the other 2 are for other purposes)

 If you now change CV2 in the decoder to increase the start voltage, so that the loco starts moving at step 2 instead of 10, you now have a range of control from 2-126. 

 If it runs way too fast at step 126 and you asjust CV5 to cut the top speed in half, you STILL have from 2-126 as a control range, just each increment will be that much finer.

 Example: Out of the box, the loco starts creeping at step 10, and at full throttle, step 126, it runs 100 smph. But this is a switcher, it really shouldn't go over 50 smph wide open. 

 Out of the box, steps 1-9 do nothing, it's dead area. Steps 10 to let's say around 70, it runs at appropriate scale speeds. From 71-126, it goes way fatser than it should, so there are another 55 steps on the throttle that are effectively useless. 

 Now you adjust CV2 so it starts moving on step 1. And you adjust CV5 so the top speed at step 126 is the same speed it ran on step 70. Now you can use all 126 steps on the throttle, from a crawl to moving as fast as the loco should in a realistic manner. You're actually expanding the range of control.

 For those DCC systems that can run a DC loco, there is no such adjustment. And most DC locos run poorly in this mode.

 For DCC Sound locos running on DC - frankly, I'm amazed anyone considers the operation to be acceptable. All increasing the start voltage will do is increase the dead band where the sound comes on until the loco actually moves, and reduce the control range. Bare minimum for running sound IMO is having something like the MRC Tech 6 which can run plain DC locos as plain DC locos and can run a DCC Sound loco as a DCC Sound loco. Just not at the same time. 

                                   --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Posted by richg1998 on Saturday, August 15, 2020 3:24 PM

There is no speed step with a dual mode decoder in the DC mode from what I know. The loco will not start moving untill the track voltage is about seven volts or so. It takes at least five volts for the microprocesso on the decoder to wake up.

Many have reported simiar numbers.

For some years I ran locos very well a much lower voltage using a good motor with can wheel and good gears.

Rich

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: west coast
  • 7,667 posts
Posted by rrebell on Saturday, August 15, 2020 4:15 PM

Seems to be some confusion here. I was running non DCC engines on a DC only layout. Then I ran a DCC and sound engine on the layout converted to DCC only. Thought because of the higher start voltage for a sound engine, it might have an effect on the motor. All I really know is it seems to run better. The two engines are of comparible quality and only the DC one is broke in so to speak.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Saturday, August 15, 2020 4:58 PM

The decoder meters voltage to the motor.  The motor does not receive rail voltage when the tracks are DCC-powered.  You could have 220 volts to the rails, with a properly designed decoder receiving it, and it should still only meter out small volts to the motor to start turning the drive mechanism and then to speed up as you dial in yet more voltage.

As pointed out, the decoder can compensate some, or at least SOME decoders are capable of wrestling with sticky drives, and make them run a bit smoother. I can't say what it is, maybe Randy can fill you in, but things like BEMF can help the decoder to figure out how to compensate for 'stickiness'.  So, if your engine really is smoother, and it's not something else, the decoder may be helping to improve the drive response.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Saturday, August 15, 2020 6:15 PM

 The starrting voltage to the MOTOR - thus encompassing friction in the drive train and all that, is the same, regardless if the loco is running on DC, or DCC. What changes though is what's on the track to get you to that point.

 When run on DCC, there is always power in the rails. The sound circuits can come alive with the loco completely motionless. Only when given a command to move does the decoder allow any voltage to reach the motor.

 When running on DC, unless you want the loco to be rolling along at half speed before it even starts making sound, the decoder artificially stops power from reaching the motor until the track voltage reaches a certain value. This will be somewhat above the voltage needed to make the cound circuit work, so you can have the loco sitting still but not going silent. That leaves you with very little range of motion of the speed knob on the DC pack to go from stop to full speed, a slight twitch can be a large change in speed, and appear to mean that the loco does not move smoothly. There are possible workarounds, but no one, at least these days, builds a DC power pack with that fine of a control.

 A non sound DC loco will almost always start moving before a sound unit, simply because of the voltage needed for the sound decoder to work.

 Some sound locos do allow the start voltage when running ion DC to be adjusted lower. This can give you better control, with a larger range of motion on the throttle knob, but you can also then end up with the loco set such that it will satrt moving silently, and then as you speed up, the sound will kick in. 

                                         --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Posted by richg1998 on Sunday, August 16, 2020 8:58 AM

I should mention I had a DC throttle from DC days but found it a waste of time to run a dual mode decoder that way. Only tried it once as I recall.

I normally used my NCE Power cab. I did notice with a Scope the motor got 12 to 14 volt pulses, PWM, The wider the pulse, the faster the motor. No pulses, motor stopped. A meter would show voltage.

Older DC only locos before DCC could crawl at maybe a couple volts real nice.

rich

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,249 posts
Posted by tstage on Sunday, August 16, 2020 11:40 AM

Lastspikemike
Modern non sound decoders will start to drive a DCC locomotive at the same or very similar low voltage regardless of whether the power controller is DC or DCC.

Actually, no.  Unlike a DC power pack, DCC is always supplied to the track at full-voltage.  (With my NCE Power Cab that would be 13.8V.)  The DCC command station tells the decoder how often to turn the motor on and off in "ones & zeros".  At low speed you have more zeros than ones; at higher speeds you have more ones than zeros.  This is VERY different than DC.

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, August 16, 2020 12:40 PM

 To the motor, this is true. But DCC always has full power on the rails.

PWM has advantages in smoother starts and running, but it does have disadvantages, primarly being much reduced starting torque, because there is only power, and thus a magnetic field, applied for a very short time when the motor is running at a slow speed. Any decent decoder though will have what the various manufacturers call torque compensation or similar to help mitigate this.

                                --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • From: Southern Florida Gulf Coast
  • 18,255 posts
Posted by SeeYou190 on Sunday, August 16, 2020 2:35 PM

Lastspikemike
Only sound equipped DCC has the higher starting voltage issue.

That is not true. My Bachmann Spectrum steamers with silent decoders still require a higher starting voltage when I run them on DC.

Back to the OP's question...

rrebell
Kinda wondered as I just hooked up my DCC system and it runs better on DCC at very slow speeds than on DC, ran engines as compatable as I could for comparison and no dual decoder for DC mode.

DCC proponents have explained it to me like this:

The DCC decoder provides a square wave Pulse Width Modulated (PWM) signal to the motor to control motor speed. This PWM signal provides smoother starts and better low speed control than if you just hooked the motor to the wheels and ran it on a filtered DC power pack.

I will not be offended by any of the DCC people that correct me.

-Kevin

Living the dream.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: west coast
  • 7,667 posts
Posted by rrebell on Sunday, August 16, 2020 2:39 PM

What I am trying to get at, correct me if i am wrong, but in DC  you vary the voltage to the motor so a motor has to start running at low voltage. DCC has a constant higher voltage that gets released to the motor in varying amounts. Since it is always on a higher voltage, it is less likely to get stopped from turning if running real slow, lets face it, in some motors  stop at certain points between the poles even when they try to latch on.

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • From: Southern Florida Gulf Coast
  • 18,255 posts
Posted by SeeYou190 on Sunday, August 16, 2020 2:41 PM

rrebell
DCC has a constant higher voltage that gets released to the motor in varying amounts. Since it is always on a higher voltage, it is less likely to get stopped from turning if running real slow,

That is how I understand the benefit of the PWM signal instead of conventional DC.

-Kevin

Living the dream.

Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,249 posts
Posted by tstage on Sunday, August 16, 2020 2:53 PM

Lastspikemike
Wow, these "conversations" go off the rails so fast.

That's a problem when you choose to use many words then make statements that are misleading.

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,367 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Sunday, August 16, 2020 3:14 PM

Lastspikemike
Modern DC powerpacks will run modern DCC equipped locomotives just fine.

From Rapido Trains:

 

Do NOT use MRC 1300-series DC controllers with any of Rapido's locomotives. The RailPower 1300 is notorious for voltage spikes and it WILL destroy your locomotive. There is no “if” about it. We will try to help you if we have the parts, but we are not responsible for locomotive damage due to voltage spikes in your power supply. As well, we will not repair any locomotive damaged by an MRC 1300-series controller (or any other "train set" DC controller) unless you have retired the controller. Otherwise the damage will soon reoccur. 

MRC seems to believe that Rapido is at fault:

ATTENTION: MRC has proudly manufactured Power Packs since 1947 and has sold more than 1 Million products to satisfied customers in North America without any issue during this time. Evidently, Rapido Trains, a relatively new train manufacturer has allegedly not made their locomotives suitable for use with MRC's 1300 & 1370 Power Packs, which have used the same tried and true technology for the last 25 years with UL Certification.

2¢   Ed

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: lavale, md
  • 4,678 posts
Posted by gregc on Sunday, August 16, 2020 4:08 PM

 

535

greg - Philadelphia & Reading / Reading

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Monday, August 17, 2020 5:44 AM

I'm largely staying out of this, but:

1) PWM for control of permanent magnet motors is done for voltage control, for example as in gregc's diagram immediately preceding.

2) in DCC, this is done entirely by the decoder, following digital commands it receives.  The motor is isolated from 'track power' in that mode.

3) The DCC track power is also PWM, for digital logic purposes.  (As the LocoFi material alludes, this is a modulation like that of audible Morse, where the duration of 'short' and 'long' pulses chosen to be much longer than usual noise sources are chosen to represent binary states)

4) If it is not obvious by now, the actual PWM in (3) bears no relationship to any PWM in (2).

5) It should therefore be no particular surprise that a power-level PWM signal modulated for motor control, imposed in place of DCC track voltage, will be wrong for anything expecting logic signals.  How wrong, might be difficult to predict, but sure as hell into the world of monkeys on typewriters inadvertently sending commands computers might recognize -- and not balancing DC charge transfer across the logic connection.

We can get to a discussion of how 'DC compatibility modes' are arranged on decoders; I would be particularly interested in reading actual details.  One logical but naive approach would be to bypass the motor leads to track power while arranging voltage-to-voltage conversion and at least keep-alive power that works with whatever other decoder-based functionality is provided in DC operation.  If this is done expecting a potentiometer-controlled or minimal-ripple DC voltage, perhaps assuming some superposed signal or AC modulation for 'compatible-with-DC' device control ... there may be problems if interrupted PWM DC is encountered instead.  (Not with respect to the motor, which would have to be of a type that would run on the bypassed PWM voltage... oh wait, wasn't there something about coreless motors not doing well on it sometimes...)

Now I'll grant you that PWM fine motor control has been a mainstream hobby technology for so long that it would be surprising if commercial manufacturers designed things ignorant of its existence.  But it may be easier just to design what is essentially a crude compatibility mode for a 'least common denominator' kind of DC control, and just forbid the wrong kind of fancy DC that causes issues.

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: lavale, md
  • 4,678 posts
Posted by gregc on Monday, August 17, 2020 6:04 AM

bi-polar DCC track signal.

In a "1" bit, the first and last part of a bit shall have the same duration, and that duration shall nominally be 58 microseconds

In a "0" bit, the duration of the first and last parts of each transition shall nominally be greater than or equal to 100 microseconds

greg - Philadelphia & Reading / Reading

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: lavale, md
  • 4,678 posts
Posted by gregc on Monday, August 17, 2020 9:37 AM

sorry for the repetition

Lastspikemike
And as I understand this, the sets of bits are also identified for the specific locomotive by an address encoded in a similar fashion

the above illustrates how data bits (1s and 0s) are transmitted on the track as DCC

the image below (x-axis is not time) shows how the demodulated bits form a DCC packet composed of a preamble, address, instructions and error correction.

Lastspikemike
Electrically, all locomotives on track continuously receive the entire signal and must actually block the control signal intended for all but the one specific address intended for that locomotive.

the decoder doesn't "block the control signal"

like ethernet, IP, ..., the decoder constructs a packet from the demodulated data bits  and simply ignores packets not with its' or a broadcast (e.g. emergency stop) address.

Lastspikemike
(I suspect all DC locomotives that may be on track get and react to the same generic signal)

DC locomotives have no decoder.   the motor in a DC locomotive reacts to the average voltage on the track which while not 0 VAC is normally 0 VDC.   

when a DCC command station attemtps to control a DC locomotive, it generates the streched zero pulse with appropriate polarity resulting in an average track voltage that is not zero which will drive any/all DC locomotives on the track.

 

you don't need to hypothesize how DCC works, the S-9 standard describes all this in detail

greg - Philadelphia & Reading / Reading

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Monday, August 17, 2020 9:40 AM

 I'm not so sure the analogy to google searches is correct. And if you look at the waveform shown in Greg's post, you can see just what is going on.

A DC loco seeing power like that (the part BEFORE the waveform marked as a stretched zero) is a power going positive and negative in equal amounts, a net zero DC voltage. But the poor armature of the motor is trying to reverse direction at the speed of the DCC signal. Power is being dissipated in the windings, but the motor isn't turning, it's buzzing at the frequency of the applied waveform. And getting hot. That's why you can't leave a DC loco on DCC powered track.

 Now, move over to the part that shows a "stretched zero". That's how some systems can run a DC loco on DCC track. It's not particularly complicated - the DCC standard sets a specific length limit for a 1 bit, but the zero bit is anything longer than a specified minimum up to a rather large maximum. By stretching either the positive half or the negative half of the zero bit, a net DC voltage of one polarity or the other can be produced. It works, but not very well, since there is still plenty of negative going pulses as part of the DCC communications stream to the DCC locos that are running. The strecthed zeros do not affect DCC decoders, other than to reduce the overall number of bits per second, but unless you have dozens of locos running, this isn;t a problem. The problem is, some DC motors can handle this better than others and work, others run at a fraction of their DC top speed and make nasty sounding noises doing it. 

 This feature was more important in the early days of DCC, when even cheap decoders were $70 or more, and many locos still were the old "all space inside the shell is solid metal" to make them pull better design so fitting a decoder often required milling weights, not a skill all modelers possess. This was particularly the case in N scale.

 At least one major manufacturer that is still around originally supported this but has removed support. Only one of the major manufacturers even still supports it, Digitrax.  

 A decoder on the track is constantly reading the data stream. After the preamble of each trnamission comes the address - if the address does not match what the decoder is configured to, it simply ignores the rest of the message and waits for the next preamble. 

(obviously I was typing my reply at the same time Greg was typing his - now here's a feature this forum desperately needs, it's on the one EE forum I participate in - if someone else has snuck in a post before you submit yours, it warns you and lets you see this new post so you can either edit yours or just forget about it)

                                         --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern CA Bay Area
  • 4,387 posts
Posted by cuyama on Monday, August 17, 2020 9:57 AM

tstage
That's a problem when you choose to use many words then make statements that are misleading.

This ^

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: west coast
  • 7,667 posts
Posted by rrebell on Monday, August 17, 2020 9:58 AM

From what I gather from all this is that I might be right in concept but not nessisarily in practical use.

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,897 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Monday, August 17, 2020 11:22 AM

rrebell

Kinda wondered as I just hooked up my DCC system and it runs better on DCC at very slow speeds than on DC, ran engines as compatable as I could for comparison and no dual decoder for DC mode.

 

What kind of DC throttle/power pack?

Sheldon

    

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Monday, August 17, 2020 3:01 PM

rrinker
I'm not so sure the analogy to google searches is correct.

It's not.  Nor is the characterization of how a Google search works.  But that's peripheral here.

While perusing S9.1, which really repeatedly punts on the issue of rail-to-rail supply voltage, think about going to the power-station standard immediately following in the list (from 2012) which answers a number of additional timeless topics.  Note that at one time it was possible to extract one-half the DCC power waveform (the pulses to +Vdcc being as modulated, but the other half-waveform being clamped essentially at zero crossing).  If you were to modulate this with voltage-determining 'average' PWM (which, note, at the DCC modulation clock rate could easily match the effect of any fast PWM power control even with significant DCC logic modulation for 'piggybacking' included) you would generate something that a DC motor of suitable construction (including suitable impedance or 'ripple filtering') could happily run on.  I don't think there are any practical 'hybrid' systems now made that would actually run this way, but for a controller that could produce either DCC control or straight DC motor control in 'unmodified' locomotives with as good PWM control as the best DC powerpacks, the idea is intriguing...

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: west coast
  • 7,667 posts
Posted by rrebell on Monday, August 17, 2020 4:35 PM

ATLANTIC CENTRAL

 

 
rrebell

Kinda wondered as I just hooked up my DCC system and it runs better on DCC at very slow speeds than on DC, ran engines as compatable as I could for comparison and no dual decoder for DC mode.

 

 

 

What kind of DC throttle/power pack?

Sheldon

 

DC is  a tech 2 #2500 by MRC. DCC isba Digitrax DCS 51.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Monday, August 17, 2020 5:17 PM

.

Never mind.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Monday, August 17, 2020 5:33 PM

Overmod
 
Lastspikemike
I make no claim to being an engineer although I have reason to believe my grasp of engineering is quite good. 

The issue is that you may believe that, but no one here who actually knows engineering seems to even begin to agree with you.  That does not bode well for an objective confirmation of your 'belief', let alone your 'reason'. 

I drew no analogy between google and DCC. 

We don't care.  The point was that your "engineering" description of what Google search does was not even remotely right. 

It is really a shame that several of the recent threads in this Electronics and DCC forum have been corrupted by replies that provide nothing but misinformation about DCC. I cannot be alone in my frustration in trying to follow a thread that is continually peppered with gibberish. Is it asking too much for someone who doesn't really know much, if anything, about DCC to stop posting such replies that only serve to derail otherwise intelligble threads?

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Monday, August 17, 2020 5:35 PM

I took the reply out, and I think you should too.  He's not advancing these topics, but discussing that doesn't help those who need objective better answers.  Let's focus on those.

And he certainly has given good advice in other modeling threads.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Monday, August 17, 2020 5:49 PM

Overmod

I took the reply out, and I think you should too.  He's not advancing these topics, but discussing that doesn't help those who need objective better answers.  Let's focus on those. 

Well, isn't that the problem here in the first place? The Electronics and DCC forum has always been a site where model railroaders can come with questions and get knowledgeable and factual answers.

When we get to the point that we don't what to believe, a thread becomes worthless. And, if enough of these threads get corrupted by such postings, then the Electronics and DCC forum itself becomes worthless. 

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • From: Southern Florida Gulf Coast
  • 18,255 posts
Posted by SeeYou190 on Monday, August 17, 2020 6:00 PM

richhotrain
Well, isn't that the problem here in the first place? The Electronics and DCC forum has always been a site where model railroaders can come with questions and get knowledgeable and factual answers.

Yes, that is the problem.

I have been on these forums for over three years, and I always read the DCC threads because I find the conversations fascinating.

The conversations have become much less fascinating because now they are dominated by explanations of why information posted is incorrect. This makes it difficult to get answers or good information.

1) I do not use DCC on my own layout.

2) I almost never post in these forums because I know very little about the subject.

3) I learn A LOT in the DCC forums by opening my mind and shutting my mouth.

4) If you do not know what you are talking about, please be like me, and keep your mouth shut and learn from those who are sharing their knowledge and experience.

SoapBox Over.

-Kevin

Living the dream.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!