Thanks for the responses so far.
Joining the tail of the wye prior to it entering the dual gage tracks is not an option. I am dealing with heritage trackwork at that spot and making a re-arrangement isn't allowed. There is not enough room to re-align, the dual gage tracks would end up being shorter, plus some operational flexibility would be lost.
Concerning the gaps, as I said the dark marks shown on the sketch are not gaps, but are there just to show where the dual gage ends.
Since the wye portion of the sketch is existing, it was previously wired for DC operation. There are existing gaps at the frog end of each of the wye turnouts as well as at the frog ends of the two turnouts that form that first crossover.
The track to the right of the wye was previously wired as a reversing section, with the reversing done (I think) with relays. However at that time the dual gage track did not exist, nor did the connection to the narrow gage loop. What is concerning me is the new dual gage stuff and the narrow gage interface. I'm trying to incorporate the reversing business as well as keep operational oopses on the narrow gage from shutting down the standard gage branch line. To me this is important, as I don't think I'm dealing with DCC friendly turnouts and the likely hood of someone running a switch is probably pretty good.
Is there any reason that both dual gage tracks cannot be made a part of the reversing section, especially if I add a gap between the two turnouts that make up the dual gage crossover to the right side of the sketch?