some layouts are having remote operating sessions (yes it's technically feasible and ecomonical)
loco control can be accomplished using phones connected to a JMRI server connected to the layout
there are several possibilities for operators monitoring their trains as well as signals thru some web interface with varying bandwidth (guesstimates):
ignoring various problems such as derailments, unintentional uncoupling, ....
i wonder what most operators would think of controlling a train using just track diagrams (2-4 above) without and video?
would anyone be interested in a virtual layout like some of the high gamers? (no worries about derailments)
greg - Philadelphia & Reading / Reading
I don't know that I'd want to run a train remotely, even with video. Without, almost certainly not. It's not realistic and there's not much fun in it that I see.
Now DISPATCHING - doing that remotely while the operators are physically present at the layout runnign the trains, makes a lot more sense. In fact it could be argued this is MORE realistic than sitting at a desk in the layout room doing the dispatching.
A massive multiplayer virtual railroad - could go either way. Running in a realistic mode, I don't know you'd find too many people, even died in the wool model operators, who would want to sit there 5 hours for their train to run the length of a 40 mile branch line. And with multiple people all in game, running on different sections, you couldn't just use the time zoom feature you do when playing such a game alone.
--Randy
Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's
Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.