Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

HO Precision Craft FA1/FA1 – back/back or elephant style?

3677 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Whitefish Bay, Wis.
  • 34 posts
HO Precision Craft FA1/FA1 – back/back or elephant style?
Posted by mmathu on Monday, January 28, 2019 7:05 PM

In the mid 2000s, Precision Craft Models made an HO scale FA1/FA1 model with ESU LokSound DCC.

 

1) Reviews at the time (such as Model Railroader April 2007 http://tinyurl.com/y8jbbl9z) said the pair of models only had one decoder which controlled both units via jumper wires, thus the two units needed to be operated as a pair.

As manufactured by Precision Craft, were these FA1/FA1 pairs wired to run back-to-back, or elephant style? I'm guessing back-to-back since that was probably where the jumper wires were.

 

2) Was one of the locos (i.e. the one with the decoder) capable of operating single without the second?  OR did it need the second locomotive connected to complete the power circuit?  Was there a speaker in each unit?

  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: SE. WI.
  • 8,253 posts
Posted by mbinsewi on Monday, January 28, 2019 7:52 PM

Well, I'm NOT the resident expert here, but going by the review in MR, it looks like they were connected back to back. I'm guessing MR ran them the way they are pictured in the review.

Looking at the pictures you can see the draw bar on the back of the loco with the decoder. and the review mentions that if you bought an FA/FB set, the B unit would have 2 speakers.

Also, looking at the pictures in the MR review, the picture with the hood off, I don't see why that loco (with decoder and speaker) wouldn't run independent of the other.  The other loco won't run unless it's connected to the loco with the decoder.  Too bad they don't show a picture of both locos with the hoods off.

In order to pull cars, with the one loco, you'd have to work something out with the draw bar, maybe seeing if you could replace it with a coupler?  I dunno!

But then again,  if you read the second paragraph of the review, it says that both must be run together?

I still think the loco with the decoder would run by itself.

More enlightend and DCC intelligent folks will chime in.  I guess I'm just kind of kicking things off with some random thoughts.

Mike.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern CA Bay Area
  • 4,387 posts
Posted by cuyama on Monday, January 28, 2019 7:58 PM

The Original Poster might receive more helpful replies if he let folks know what it is he is trying to do that prompts the question.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Whitefish Bay, Wis.
  • 34 posts
Posted by mmathu on Friday, June 14, 2019 4:10 PM

I am considering buying a Precision Craft FA1/FA1, and am trying to understand the limitations in how the tether system they use is configured, and try to understand what the possibilities/difficulties would be to modify it.

  • Member since
    December 2015
  • From: Shenandoah Valley
  • 9,094 posts
Posted by BigDaddy on Friday, June 14, 2019 6:22 PM

I read it as a third speaker over the rear trucks in the A unit. 

It says "Eight-wheel drive and power pickup, jumpered in parallel" so in theory you could replace the drawbar with a coupler and it would run the A unit solo.  I guess what you really need to know is how easy is it to install a coupler.  It is not listed in Kadee's conversion list. 

Henry

COB Potomac & Northern

Shenandoah Valley

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Canada, eh?
  • 13,375 posts
Posted by doctorwayne on Saturday, June 15, 2019 11:23 AM

BigDaddy
...I guess what you really need to know is how easy is it to install a coupler....

I can't imagine that it would be all that difficult to put Kadees on any HO locomotive. 
A quick search yielded this photo which shows truck-mounted drawbars.

The old Model Power FAs had truck-mounted couplers, too, so I'd guess that a bit of modification to the trucks would allow one of Kadee's many offerings to be installed. 
It's difficult to tell without having the actual model in-hand, but it may also be possible to remove the drawbar mounting points from the trucks and add body-mounted couplers.
Were I a DCC operator, I'd also redo the wires between the units with mini plugs modified to look like mu cables - should be do-able on both ends of both units.

Wayne

  • Member since
    April 2019
  • From: Pacific Northwest
  • 780 posts
Posted by SPSOT fan on Saturday, June 15, 2019 3:24 PM

mmathu

I am considering buying a Precision Craft FA1/FA1, and am trying to understand the limitations in how the tether system they use is configured, and try to understand what the possibilities/difficulties would be to modify it.

I am curious as to why the OP would want to buy an older model with such a limitation as drawbar connected units. For me at least this is a major issue as the real locos were not permanently connected and rutinely changes power lashups.

I do know that Proto 2000 (and maybe P1K too) did some FA/FB locos at one point, which are likely still around (my grandfather has two that he got relitively recently), and they run okay (no the best though...). If you can aford it Rapido did FA/B2s recently that look very nice.

I guess if the OP really needs an FA1 the way Precision Craft made it but they are no longer around and a very rare manufacturer so they may be a bit hard to get parts for and such, just saying...

Regards, Isaac

I model my railroad and you model yours! I model my way and you model yours!

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Whitefish Bay, Wis.
  • 34 posts
Posted by mmathu on Saturday, June 15, 2019 3:36 PM

I am looking at the Precision Scale FA-1 models because I can get it factory-decorated for the road name I prefer, and avoid painting an intricate scheme and developing decals which aren’t available commercially.

Also, the Walthers Trainline FA-1 did not do a good job with the nose contour, which is another drawback.

Rapido’s models are FA/B2s --- that is not the model I’m interested in (nor were they ever used by the prototype I model), so I certainly would not consider that.
  • Member since
    April 2019
  • From: Pacific Northwest
  • 780 posts
Posted by SPSOT fan on Saturday, June 15, 2019 3:42 PM

That's understandable! I have noticed that there are P2K and Rapido FA2s but no good quality FA1s. As I like the SP&S, who had alot of FA1, but very few FA2s, that is very disappointing. I wonder what the detail deifferences are between FA1s and 2s...

Regards, Isaac

I model my railroad and you model yours! I model my way and you model yours!

  • Member since
    December 2014
  • 69 posts
Posted by BumpyJack68 on Thursday, July 15, 2021 9:25 PM

My $.02 :D Prototype FT locos had drawbars between units & were sold in pairs;

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMD_FT

I have a set of PC FA1s, the drawbar is body mounted. They look great, sound great, pull great and run smooth. I paid $125 for the set 2 weeks ago including shipping! Used but cherry! The boxes are cherry as well! I run all my wagons MU anyway, so what's not to like? Cheers!

 

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Thursday, July 15, 2021 10:17 PM

SPSOT fan

That's understandable! I have noticed that there are P2K and Rapido FA2s but no good quality FA1s. 

What do you find wrong with the P2K FA/FB-1's?  I've got a bunch of them, and they look pretty good to me.

 

Ed

 

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Friday, July 16, 2021 7:41 AM

The first thing you need to overcome is can the connector be moved to the front of the engine if you want to run them elephant style. The second problem will be reversing the wires to the motor on the non decoder engine since it is set up to connect both back ends. In essence the non decoder engine is set up to run backward when the decoder engine runs forward.  The most important issue is are you capable of making the changes?  Best bet may be putting the shells on different manufacturers chassis giving you the best of both worlds.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!