Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Digitrax Hijinx

1194 views
7 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Digitrax Hijinx
Posted by SpaceMouse on Friday, February 16, 2018 5:18 PM

Okay, I thought I knew what I was doing. 

The first wierd thing is that I could not program in ad4. 

I enter the number, hit enter, get the question, hit Y+ button and nothing. 

I did the same with AD2 and hit enter, I got the "Good" response. I was able to run my tests using abreviated codes. 

Next wierd thing was the Bachman 0-6-0 decoder. 

I tested it on 03 and it worked fine. 

Its road number is 2240 so I started there. I entered it and got "No Good"

So I tried ad2 and 224 and still got "No Good" (at least that is what I'm thinking it means.

Anyway, I can't program it and I can no longer run it on 03.

Any ideas what to do next? 

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Friday, February 16, 2018 5:51 PM

 What decoder is in it? Those Bachmann decoders often need a resistor across the program track for it to work. 

                                    --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Friday, February 16, 2018 6:03 PM

I heard you mention 100 ohm before. I think I have a bunch of those. I'm not going to disect it to find out which decoder, as I'm having a bad day with fixing things. I'll include a resistor when I set up my programming track. 

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Friday, February 16, 2018 6:55 PM

 Don't permanently include it, other decoders don't need such nonsense.

                        --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Pa.
  • 3,361 posts
Posted by DigitalGriffin on Friday, February 16, 2018 7:01 PM

You could try setting the CV's by hand by programming on the main (OPS programming)  CV17, 18, and finally 29 to use the long address.

CV17 = 200

CV18 = 192

CV29 = 38

Don - Specializing in layout DC->DCC conversions

Modeling C&O transition era and steel industries There's Nothing Like Big Steam!

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Friday, February 16, 2018 9:49 PM

DigitalGriffin
You could try setting the CV's by hand by programming on the main (OPS programming)  CV17, 18, and finally 29 to use the long address.

I have a crapload of decoders, I may just switch the wierd one out. 

So what do you guys think is causing the wierdness with AD4 addresses? It's like my DT400 is not recognizing the Y+ button. This happened on a variety of decoders and I have programmed all these decoders before. I was just forced to renumber because I failed to write down the numbers I had previously assigned. 

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 8,877 posts
Posted by maxman on Friday, February 16, 2018 9:56 PM

SpaceMouse
I was just forced to renumber because I failed to write down the numbers I had previously assigned.

Well, had you left all the short addresses as 3, and made the long addresses the number on the side of the cab, you wouldn't have had this memory issue.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Friday, February 16, 2018 10:57 PM

http://lifesurfersguide.com/Images/Trains/RockRidgeI06.jpg

Nice in theory, but almost half of my locos are unlettered. Still, I have them written down now. 

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!