Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Running dummy B Units between powered A Units

2560 views
10 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 499 posts
Running dummy B Units between powered A Units
Posted by De Luxe on Monday, June 19, 2017 11:10 AM

Currently thinking about adding DCC to an ABBA Proto E7 mashup. Only the A Units are powered, the B Units are dummies. Is there anything I should pay attention to besides having the same adress and settings for both decoders and wireing the front A to run forward and the rear A to run backward? I somehow feel uncomfortable having 2 unpowered and much lighter B Units in between 2 powered and heavier A Units, always fearing that the rear A Unit could push the B dummies against the front A Unit...

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • 2,616 posts
Posted by peahrens on Monday, June 19, 2017 1:27 PM

You definitely can run dummies between powered units. 

On "wiring the rear A to run backward", just wire both A's the same so they run forward when your throttle is running one alone.  When making up the consist, just set the appropriate CV for the rear A unit (nose backward) to tell the DCC system that one runs backwards when the consist is running forward.

On the weight issue, I did have a bit of issue with an A-B-A E6 P2K setup where the B unit derailed on occasion.  Not sure if the rear unit was running a bit faster re: speed matching but not much.  I simply added a bit of weight inside the B unit (a couple of hefty steel nuts).  You may not need to do that, so wait and see.

Paul

Modeling HO with a transition era UP bent

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,483 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Monday, June 19, 2017 3:15 PM

I'd agree with adding weight to the B unit if it's too light.  My dummy B unit is an old Athearn which was built on the same metal chassis as the powered unit, so it's fine.

I like to put a sound-only decoder in dummy engines.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Monday, June 19, 2017 4:35 PM

 I've had lighter freight cars between the loco and heavier cars, and on the club layout, which is I think 28" radius, I can do very jerky jack rabbit starts and stops and they never come off the rails. With proper train handling, not a chance. I don;t think there will be any problem as-is. Go ahead and add a little weight to the B if you think it needs it, but extra weight added to the B unit is fewer cars the two powered A's can pull. Maybe that's not an issue either, as most A units can pull more cars than a real one, and two powered units can haul a long train indeed.

                             --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Monday, June 19, 2017 4:43 PM

De Luxe

I somehow feel uncomfortable having 2 unpowered and much lighter B Units in between 2 powered and heavier A Units...

You should. I have two pairs of Proto 2000 PA consists. The A units are powered and the B units are dummies. On occasion, I run the four units as a single consist. Early on, I realized the need to add weight to the B units. Without added weight, I had all kinds of problems, especially with derailments but also with unintended uncouplings.
 
Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 499 posts
Posted by De Luxe on Monday, June 19, 2017 6:06 PM

Well, the point is I need that mashup for pulling a 12 car passenger train which is made up of 2 Walthers Proto Smooth Side cars, 5 Walthers Mainline Corrugated Side cars, 4 Rivarossi Smooth Side cars and one IHC Corrugated Side car. All cars have full interiors, passengers and interior lights. Quite a heavy train. Normally an ABB mashup would be prototypically correct for this train (and eleminate the possible problem of B dummies being pushed against the front A Unit), but I fear that a sole A Unit won´t be able to pull the train alone and therefore requires help of another powered A Unit (the Units haven´t arrived yet so I couldn´t test it).

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Monday, June 19, 2017 6:50 PM

I can use a single powered E7, Athearn SD40-2 chassis with a Cary E7A metal shell to pull two weighted E7Bs and 11 over weight cars up my 3½% grades without a problem.  You shouldn’t have any problems unless you have steeper grades on your layout.
 
I’m a power guy and I normally run a pair of powered A&B E7s with a third trailing unpowered B but a single powered unit will do the job.  A pair of sound equipped E7s sounds so much better than a single E7.
 
 
 
Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Chi-Town
  • 7,712 posts
Posted by zstripe on Monday, June 19, 2017 7:24 PM

Just make sure You weight the B's......close to what the A's weigh. Speed match the two as close as You can, a few RPM's won't matter. Put the faster one at the rear.

I run DC with a ABBA consist......Walthers Proto F3A powered, Intermountain F3B powered, Athearn BB F7B dummy extra weight with NWSL wheels and a Athearn F7A powered with NWSL wheels, along with a ten car Walthers 85 ft Mainline line cars with added interior/lights. Also the whole train is close coupled with diaphragms. The lead engines have a 14 to 1 gear ratio and the Athearn F7 has a 12 to 1 gear ratio, they all start at the same speed......but the Athearn does have a higher top end speed, but they all run great together, not a problem. Just for giggles, I put a CMX track cleaning car filled with lacquer thinner in the front and they even pushed that around the layout with the full train. I have all broad curves on the layout and havn't had any kind of derailments yet! Power comes from MRC CM 20's used solely for engines, nothing else.

Take Care! Big Smile

Frank

 

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 499 posts
Posted by De Luxe on Monday, June 19, 2017 7:49 PM

Ok, you guys gave me some hope now. On my future layout, I don´t plan to have any grades steeper than 3%. So I hope that the powered A Unit with 2 light B dummies in tow can still handle my 12 car Golden State train! By the way 11 out of 12 cars roll super free as only the last car has the electrical pickups, as the power is being transfered from to car to car by double plug connections. My MTH SP GS-4 4-8-4 has no trouble at all with this consist, so I really hope that my Proto RI E7 ABB mashup won´t have troubles too! Would be great if I wouldn´t need the second A Unit!

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Tuesday, June 20, 2017 8:01 AM

De Luxe

Currently thinking about adding DCC to an ABBA Proto E7 mashup. Only the A Units are powered, the B Units are dummies. Is there anything I should pay attention to besides having the same adress and settings for both decoders and wireing the front A to run forward and the rear A to run backward? I somehow feel uncomfortable having 2 unpowered and much lighter B Units in between 2 powered and heavier A Units, always fearing that the rear A Unit could push the B dummies against the front A Unit...

 
I imagine it happened sometime - somewhere, but an A-B-B-A lashup of E-units would be pretty rare! On a 12 car train like you've describe, an A-A or A-B lashup would be far more common.
 
However, keep in mind that E-units, due to the center axle being unpowered, were great on fast flatland runs, but had great difficulties on grades. Several railroads that bought E-units for trains going through mountainous territory (like Santa Fe and Great Northern) soon came to realize the E-units were ineffective on grades, often overheated, so switched to passenger F-units. A-B-B-A lash-ups of F-units were pretty common.
 
Stix
  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 499 posts
Posted by De Luxe on Tuesday, June 20, 2017 9:40 AM

Yes, the SR pulled the Crescent by 4 E8 A Units and the UP City of Everywhere required even 5 E9 Units in A-B-B-B-A lashups. But these were exceptions because of what you wrote. As ar as I know RI always used either A-B or A-B-B lashups on the Golden State. Never more than 3 Units because it simply wasn´t necessary because of the relatively flat territory. So I really hope one powered Proto E7 can handle it...

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!