Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

What DCC innovations have come to pass in the last 2 years?

1886 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Metro East St. Louis
  • 5,743 posts
What DCC innovations have come to pass in the last 2 years?
Posted by simon1966 on Saturday, February 6, 2016 8:29 PM

I have paid zero attention to DCC during the past 2 years during a hiatus from the hobby.   A quick look at Digitrax and NCE web sites suggests that nothing has really changed.  Anyone care to give me a quick primer on recent innovations.   

Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Posted by richg1998 on Saturday, February 6, 2016 8:36 PM

One thing to remember, DCC is only ONE way for controlling trains with digital technology. There are about six different ways and not all compatible with each other.

Sound decoders and non sound decoders are shrinking and have more capabilities. Check out the different decoder manufactures and systems.

TCS has the Wow decoder.

SoundTraxx, the Econami decoder.

There is DCC, DCS, Bluetooth, at least three wireless systems using battery power, sometimes called dead rail. Those can operate on DC, DCC, DCS roads also for charging the battery.

Rich

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

  • Member since
    March 2015
  • 1,358 posts
Posted by SouthPenn on Saturday, February 6, 2016 9:02 PM

The only advancement would be in auto reversers. They are much improved and can also throw switches, and provide circut protection.

South Penn
  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 1,206 posts
Posted by mfm37 on Saturday, February 6, 2016 9:44 PM

More features in decoders. More numerous and smaller sound decoders. same or lower prices for decoders.

Considering a 2 function, 2 digit only, simple motor decoder with no read back set me back almost $50 in 1996, things have come a long way.

Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,249 posts
Posted by tstage on Saturday, February 6, 2016 9:52 PM

Simon,

Welcome back to the forum!  Hope to see you around here a little more often?

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    May 2011
  • 743 posts
Posted by Steven S on Saturday, February 6, 2016 11:31 PM

You might be interested in the open-source DCC++ system that was recently developed using inexpensive Arduino boards.  You can build a DCC base unit for under $40.  Because it's open-source, people from all over the world can contribute features to it.  Who knows what it can become in the coming years.

http://www.trainboard.com/highball/index.php?threads/introducing-dcc-a-complete-open-source-dcc-station-and-interface.84800/

 

Steve S

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Bradford, Ontario
  • 15,797 posts
Posted by hon30critter on Sunday, February 7, 2016 12:12 AM

Hi Simon:

Welcome back!

There is a current thread running on how to build your own DCC system using the Arduino platform:

http://cs.trains.com/mrr/f/744/t/253905.aspx

There is also a thread on using the Arduino to set up random structure lighting. Scroll down a bit to get to the Arduino part:

http://cs.trains.com/mrr/f/744/t/253815.aspx

Dave

I'm just a dude with a bad back having a lot of fun with model trains, and finally building a layout!

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,483 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Sunday, February 7, 2016 10:17 AM

Welcome back, Simon!

I think the changes to DCC have been more "evolutionary" than "revolutionary" over the past few years.  Mostly, I'd say decoders have more capabilities and are smaller, and a few manufacturers have started releasing "economy" versions of their sound decoders.  The "sugar cube" speaker has become popular for do-it-yourself installations.

Athearn finally got tired of the complaints about the MRC decoders they were putting in their RTR locomotives and switched (I think) to SoundTraxx.  Bachmann has their "Sound Value" line of RTR locomotives that come with a second-tier SoundTraxx decoder.  I've got a couple of these Bachmann engines and I'm very happy with them.

Some people have been interfacing their smart phones to their DCC systems as throttles.  I don't even have a smart phone.

There are a few more options for stationary decoders to drive switch machines.  They don't add anything new, but I think they're a bit cheaper per motor, and drive more motors per circuit.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Pa.
  • 3,361 posts
Posted by DigitalGriffin on Sunday, February 7, 2016 10:48 AM

Lets see

USP/Super Caps for backup on dirty track

Paragon 3 with the subwoofer

TCS diesel decoders

Sountraxx Economi

Bluetooth Control (ie: bachmann)

In terms of the command station list of things:

Everyone is moving to digital hand held throttles using programs similar to JMRI and Android phones.  It's a lot cheaper and a lot more flexible.

 

Don - Specializing in layout DC->DCC conversions

Modeling C&O transition era and steel industries There's Nothing Like Big Steam!

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, February 7, 2016 10:54 AM

 In just the past 2 years - not much really. Aside from some manufacturers switching which decoders come in their sound equipped units, that's really about it.

 I'm realizing it's been almost exactly 2 years since my layout was last operational, before I took it apart to move. I've been here almost 2 years now. Before the move, I had a loco with a Loksound Select, Athearn was using Tsunami, I was driving trains with my smartphone, and I was using servos for turnouts instead of Tortoises. Product lineup from Digitrax and NCE hasn't changed much, maybe the DCC Twin from NCE wasn't shipping 2 years ago but it was definitely announced. WOW Sound from TCS is shipping in both steam and diesel, and Soundtraxx has introduced the Econami line.

                  --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Metro East St. Louis
  • 5,743 posts
Posted by simon1966 on Sunday, February 7, 2016 12:45 PM

Thanks for the welcome back, nice to see a lot of familiar names on the board.  I have a ton of work to get the layout back up and running.   One of the boys dismantled my duck under bridge that blocks the entrance in to the layout and in doing so destroyed the loop.  I can't remember the last time that the DCC system was fired up so who knows what gremlins have appeared.  The track I am sure is filthy, there is evidence of a mouse nest in my mountain Dead, so lots of maintenance to get going.  

I think I am most suprised with Digitrax, I felt sure that by now they would have come out with a next generation, but if smartphones are becoming the throttle of choice, then this must really be putting the brakes on new throttle development, and I would assume be hitting the bottom line of the DCC manufacturers in general.

 

Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Sunday, February 7, 2016 2:26 PM

Well, it was actually three years ago the decoder transmission standards were approved NMRA S-9.3.2.   This is the answer to Digitrax LocoNet Transponding.  However, I've not seen any of the manufacturers doing anything with it. 

And I don't know if this qualifies or not but the Layout Command Control LCC was approve about a year ago NMRA S-9.7.0 (02/17/2015).

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!