Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

reverse loop with yard attached

2621 views
12 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2012
  • From: Berkeley, CA
  • 39 posts
reverse loop with yard attached
Posted by thinkstorm on Thursday, November 15, 2012 12:39 AM
My layout has a very large reverse loop. A siding leads from within the reverse loop into a (dead end) yard. Can I wire the yard and the main track on same polarity, gap the siding into the yard, and put only the loop on AR? Or do i have to put the loop and the attached yard together onto the same AR power district? I'd rather have them on separate power districts but are not sure if I then also need an AR for the yard, if two ARs next to each other start playing ping-pong, ...
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: N.E. Lancashire (off Jnt. 12, M65.
  • 215 posts
Posted by john.pickles87 on Thursday, November 15, 2012 5:27 AM

Hi TS,

Depends how far into the loop your siding starts, if it's close to where the tracks split I'd feed it from the split (feed the yard separately), with the loop starting after the point (switch) .  Your loop really only starts after the point where you will need some kind of isolation between it's frog and the frog at the split.  Hope i read you right and this helps.

Be in touch.

pick

?
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • 773 posts
Posted by ruderunner on Thursday, November 15, 2012 6:19 AM

I've got a similar arangement for my staging yard although my yard is double ended.

I have my yard wired paralell to my mainline, the reverse loop is on a reverser.

Warning:  My layout isn't in operating form yet, still have to install all my feeders

Modeling the Cleveland and Pittsburgh during the PennCentral era starting on the Cleveland lakefront and ending in Mingo junction

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,483 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Thursday, November 15, 2012 6:21 AM

I have a similar situation.  It's best to wire the yard and the reverse loop together, all on the AR.

You never want to put two ARs together.  They will ping-pong trying to keep the polarities matched.

The only reason to put the yard on the main power would be to avoid the power limits of the AR.  But, ARs today put out plenty of power, and should easily handle both the loop and the yard.

Here's a question, though, for those more knowledgable than I:  Can you put a circuit breaker inside a reverser-protected zone?  I think it would work, but I'm not sure how a circuit breaker would like being fed by a power source which flips polarity occasionally, and how it would work with occasional shorts on its input.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    February 2012
  • From: Berkeley, CA
  • 39 posts
Posted by thinkstorm on Friday, November 30, 2012 12:43 AM

This was a great idea, works like a charm! many thanks...

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Friday, November 30, 2012 7:12 AM

MisterBeasley

I have a similar situation.  It's best to wire the yard and the reverse loop together, all on the AR.

You never want to put two ARs together.  They will ping-pong trying to keep the polarities matched.

The only reason to put the yard on the main power would be to avoid the power limits of the AR.  But, ARs today put out plenty of power, and should easily handle both the loop and the yard.

Here's a question, though, for those more knowledgable than I:  Can you put a circuit breaker inside a reverser-protected zone?  I think it would work, but I'm not sure how a circuit breaker would like being fed by a power source which flips polarity occasionally, and how it would work with occasional shorts on its input.

No, it needs to be the other way around, breaker feeding the autoreverse. If you put the breaker after the autoreverse, the breaker will be tripping instead of the autoreverser. And if you set delay times such that the reverser trips first, it will do so on a short as well.  For those reversers that aren;t also breakers, you put the breaker first, then the autorevers, so the first thing that happens is the reverser tries to fix the problem, it it's still a short, then the breaker trips and saves the train and the reverser.

                    --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Friday, November 30, 2012 7:16 AM

Randy, how do you wire that setup?  Does the input side of the auto-reverser draw its power from the circuit breaker?

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Friday, November 30, 2012 8:33 AM

 Yes, that's pretty standard, prior to the PS-AR and PSX-AR, most things were autoreverser or circuit breakers, but not both.

              --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,483 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Friday, November 30, 2012 8:56 AM

rrinker
No, it needs to be the other way around, breaker feeding the autoreverse. If you put the breaker after the autoreverse, the breaker will be tripping instead of the autoreverser.

That's not quite the configuration I was thinking of, but in reading my own question I realize that I didn't make myself very clear.

I'm thinking of a reverse loop with a yard inside.  The autoreverser would protect the ends of the loop, and also feed the circuit breaker which would handle the yard, which would be isolated but would not experience polarity flips on the track side.  I was just wondering if the circuit breaker would handle polarity flips at its input.  It's kind of an academic question, because few layouts have this kind of configuration with a yard too big for the power an autoreverser can handle.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Friday, November 30, 2012 6:25 PM

 I think I had the component order the same way you are trying describe though.

So you have a reverse loop - standard old balloon loop, insulated at the turnout, all track int he loop powered from an autoreverser - standard stuff, works great.

Now you are saying, off the loop, run a lead track and yard. Insulated joiners at the turnout on the lead track. All yard feeders tot he output of a circuit breaker. Input of the circuit breaker connected to the output of the autoreverser.

I'm still not sure that would work. The yard could be powered fromthe main, creating a third interface where there might need to be a phase change, that would mean a train couldn;t leave the yard and enter the loop at the same time another train is entering or exiting the loop. I'm thinking I would just try to avoid this sort of track arrangment in the first place, but newer autoreversers can handle 5+ amps so there's really no reason why the yard can;t just flip phase with the rest of it. Only problem I see is if it was an engine terminal, with lots of sound locos parked there. The reverser may not recover fast enought o prevent a lurch in a train entering or exiting the loop. Way to avoid it altogether, at least if it's just a simple loop with a yard in it, would be to use switch machine contacts to power a heavy duty relay with DPDT contacts. Prevent the short rather than react  to it.

                 --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    January 2011
  • From: Alberta, Canada
  • 624 posts
Posted by chochowillie on Friday, November 30, 2012 7:23 PM

thinkstorm
This was a great idea, works like a charm! many thanks...

Ok, same problem/challenge for me Thinkstorm, now please let me know which of the ideas/solutions "works like a charm". Confused

Thanks Big Smile

CDN Dennis 

Modeling the HO scale something or other RR in the shadow of the Canadian Rockies Alberta, Canada

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • From: Mt Pleasant, Utah
  • 93 posts
Posted by Dave Merrill on Friday, November 30, 2012 9:48 PM

MisterBeasley
You never want to put two ARs together.  They will ping-pong trying to keep the polarities matched.

MisterBeasley,

The PSX-AR advertises a fairly new feature 'Double Reverse Mode' which addresses this issue.  See http://dccspecialties.com/products/pdf/man_psxar.pdf  page 12 for more info.

Regards,

Dave

From Mt Pleasant, Utah, the home of the Hill Valley and Thistle Railroad where the Buffalo still roam and a Droid runs the trains

  • Member since
    February 2012
  • From: Berkeley, CA
  • 39 posts
Posted by thinkstorm on Monday, December 3, 2012 12:35 AM

Ups, sorry: I now have the AR loop start after the Yard turnout and wired the yard and turnout same polarity as the rest of the main (but on a separate block).  the AR loop got insignificantly shorter, totally fine for me. I want to be able to clear the main + yard turnout anyways, so no longer trains than the AR loop from yard back to main anyways either.

chochowillie

thinkstorm
This was a great idea, works like a charm! many thanks...

Ok, same problem/challenge for me Thinkstorm, now please let me know which of the ideas/solutions "works like a charm". Confused

Thanks Big Smile

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!