Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

DCC circuit breakers

5238 views
7 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Columbia, IL
  • 394 posts
DCC circuit breakers
Posted by wdcrvr on Monday, June 27, 2011 8:47 PM

I am building an HO DCC layout.  I think I would like to break the layout up into about 4 or 5 sections with seperate circuit breakers to avoid having the entire layout go down if a problem occurs.  I would like suggestions/recommendations for circuit breakers to use.

thanks

wdcrvr

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Monday, June 27, 2011 9:05 PM

If it's 4 or 5 sections the Digitrax PM42 should do the trick. It does 4 sectoins on 1 board. 

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • 550 posts
Posted by hdtvnut on Tuesday, June 28, 2011 1:49 AM
If you have locos with sound decoders, spend a little more and get PSX breakers from DCC Specialties. The others available don't do a good job with sound decoders, but the PSX's are designed to handle the current inrush problem common with them. I have them, and have equiped two clubs with them successfully. Hal
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,483 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Tuesday, June 28, 2011 6:25 AM

I also use PSX circuit breakers.  I have the 4-circuit-on-one-board variant.  It seems to work very well.  Most of my engines have sound.

I also use the older models of PSX auto-reversers.  These auto-reversers are also circuit breakers, so you don't need to provide separate breaker protection for auto-reverse areas.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Eastern Shore Virginia
  • 3,290 posts
Posted by gandydancer19 on Tuesday, June 28, 2011 1:28 PM

I choose to go with the NCE EB-1 circuit breakers.  They can handle sound locomotives and are cheaper in price than the PSX that everyone seems to rave about.

Our club also choose to go with the NCE breakers for the same reasons.

What you should do is look at the prices, then download the manuals for both breakers, PSX and NCE EB-1's, read them, and then choose the one that would work for your budget and DCC system.

Elmer.

The above is my opinion, from an active and experienced Model Railroader in N scale and HO since 1961.

(Modeling Freelance, Eastern US, HO scale, in 1962, with NCE DCC for locomotive control and a stand alone LocoNet for block detection and signals.) http://waynes-trains.com/ at home, and N scale at the Club.

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • 550 posts
Posted by hdtvnut on Tuesday, June 28, 2011 7:57 PM
I respectfully disagree with you, having done an investigation of the EB-3 with BLI/QSI engines years back. The high capacitance these decoders present to the breaker causes high inrush current, and make it oscillate on/off with two or more engines in that block, depending on the exact circumstances. This can be improved by adding shunt resistance such as a car tail-light, but doing so partly negates the purpose of the breaker, which is to keep the average current, thus power, very low during a short condition. The PSX has a smart circuit that allows a high inrush, without resetting, long enough for the capacitors to charge. I can have at least six QSI-decoder-type engines on a PSX, and it will reset properly after a short. The EB-3/PM42 can't do this without a shunt, and the shunt means higher current and power at the short. If you don't operate multiple sound engines with keep-alive capacitors within a block, go for the cheap stuff, but don't tell me there's no difference. Hal
  • Member since
    March 2010
  • From: Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
  • 252 posts
Posted by CNR378 on Wednesday, June 29, 2011 10:16 AM

A properly setup PM42 will reset after a short. We use PM42s at my club and have no issues with them.

Peter

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Eastern Shore Virginia
  • 3,290 posts
Posted by gandydancer19 on Thursday, June 30, 2011 2:26 PM

hdtvnut
I respectfully disagree with you, having done an investigation of the EB-3 with BLI/QSI engines years back. The high capacitance these decoders present to the breaker causes high inrush current, and make it oscillate on/off with two or more engines in that block, depending on the exact circumstances. This can be improved by adding shunt resistance such as a car tail-light, but doing so partly negates the purpose of the breaker, which is to keep the average current, thus power, very low during a short condition. The PSX has a smart circuit that allows a high inrush, without resetting, long enough for the capacitors to charge. I can have at least six QSI-decoder-type engines on a PSX, and it will reset properly after a short. The EB-3/PM42 can't do this without a shunt, and the shunt means higher current and power at the short. If you don't operate multiple sound engines with keep-alive capacitors within a block, go for the cheap stuff, but don't tell me there's no difference. Hal

Who said anything about EB-3's?

I know the EB-3 will not handle sound locomotives.

I recommended the EB-1.  Maybe you should pay more attention to what you are reading.

Elmer.

The above is my opinion, from an active and experienced Model Railroader in N scale and HO since 1961.

(Modeling Freelance, Eastern US, HO scale, in 1962, with NCE DCC for locomotive control and a stand alone LocoNet for block detection and signals.) http://waynes-trains.com/ at home, and N scale at the Club.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!