Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

I Quit

10010 views
56 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Thursday, June 2, 2011 7:21 AM

hobo9941
What's wrong with alcohol? I thought it was accepted for track cleaning.

 Nothing, but it may not be a strong enough solvent for really dirty track. Ont he club modular layout the CMX car runs with laquer thinner after each setup. But that layout has some modules 20 years old, with old Atlas track and it does not live in a climate controlled area between shows - heck some of the show venues might not be considered climate controlled. Plastic wheels are banned, and generally there aren't any problems after the initial cleaning, trains then run fine for an entire weekend show. The cleaning train actually has 3 cleaner cars, the CMX dispensing laquer thinner and then a pair of Centerline cars with Handi-wipes on the rollers to dry it. You do have to be careful, if you open the valve ont he CMX car so that the laquer thinner floods out, it will melt plastic ties, but just keepign the pad damp, it evaporates too fast to do any damage, and after the train passes, with those Centerline cars wiping things clean, the rail is completely dry. This is the only liquid that touches the track, we NEVER spread anything like clipper oil on the rails.

                          --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Thursday, June 2, 2011 7:49 AM

"Goo Gone" works well. Alcohol isn't so good, when it dries it can actually inhibit electrical current. Sound equipped engines are particularly touchy when it comes to dirty track or wheels.

Stix
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Thursday, June 2, 2011 10:04 PM

 Maybe 70% rubbing alcohol, which is 30% something else. Denatured alchol isn;t goign to leave a residue, it's going to evaporate nearly instantly. Goo Gone is more likely to leave some kind of film than any sort of alcohol (well now don't be washing down your track with good bourbon or something..)

                         --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    February 2010
  • From: Colorado (the flat part)
  • 607 posts
Posted by Colorado_Mac on Friday, June 3, 2011 12:05 AM

hobo9941
What's wrong with alcohol? I thought it was accepted for track cleaning.

Alcohol is accepted for making track cleaning bearable. I prefer Jack Daniels in a short glass with three ice cubes.  After I drink that, I clean the track.  All is good...

Sean

HO Scale CSX Modeler

  • Member since
    March 2009
  • From: wisconsin rapids, wi
  • 113 posts
Posted by ratdogsoo on Friday, June 3, 2011 1:48 PM

my thoughts also Javelina. i enjoy running trains the way i did in my Lionel days. i don't need them to do tricks. i also drive a 33 yr. pickup. regards, mike.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Friday, June 3, 2011 1:55 PM

Colorado_Mac

 hobo9941:
What's wrong with alcohol? I thought it was accepted for track cleaning.

 

Alcohol is accepted for making track cleaning bearable. I prefer Jack Daniels in a short glass with three ice cubes.  After I drink that, I clean the track.  All is good...

If you think Jack Daniels does the trick, you should try Glenlivet.

Rich

Alton Junction

Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,249 posts
Posted by tstage on Friday, June 3, 2011 2:04 PM

ratdogsoo

i enjoy running trains the way i did in my Lionel days. i don't need them to do tricks.

 

Sigh...DCC has nothing to do with "tricks", Mike.  It's just a alternate way to operate a single train (or multiple trains) and to do it realistically.  No one (at least that I know of) is trying to do loop-the-loops or shoot rockets off flatbeds with their DCC throttles.

Stick with DC.  It's your prerogative.

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Friday, June 3, 2011 5:17 PM

tstage

 ratdogsoo:

i enjoy running trains the way i did in my Lionel days. i don't need them to do tricks.

 

 

Sigh...DCC has nothing to do with "tricks", Mike.  It's just a alternate way to operate a single train (or multiple trains) and to do it realistically.  No one (at least that I know of) is trying to do loop-the-loops or shoot rockets off flatbeds with their DCC throttles.

Stick with DC.  It's your prerogative.

Tom

Darn, now I wish I hadn't sold my Lionel HO missle launching car. I could have converted it to DCC!

                    --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Friday, June 3, 2011 6:25 PM

That or the car with the big searchlight that spun around.

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Friday, June 3, 2011 6:58 PM

 My Lionel HO consisted of the missile launcher, the exploding boxcar, the atomic waste car (a DCC decoder light effect would be great for the red glow), and the section gang car that reversed itself when it hit a bumper - perfect for the DC guys, no DCC needed.

Laugh

          --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,483 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Friday, June 3, 2011 8:01 PM

Hamltnblue

That or the car with the big searchlight that spun around.

I have an HO scale car with a big searchlight, and the big orange generator.  The light doesn't spin around.  I think it's a Varney.  I'm going to have to find it and replace the horn-hooks with Kadees, now, dagnabbit.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Friday, June 3, 2011 8:02 PM

Hmm, I think I'd actually buy one of those if I saw one.

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,483 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Saturday, June 4, 2011 11:26 PM

I found it.

Did prototype railroads actually have anything like this? Or was it a silly invention by model train companies? Anyway, it's a very old metal car. The circular recepticles in front of the light make me think this was adapted from a TOFC car. The power pickups are springs attached to the metal axles, one on each truck. Not very reliable pickup, but after 50 years, this thing still works.  I did not photoshop in the bright glow from the searchlight.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, June 5, 2011 12:16 AM

 Well I know the Reading never had anything like that. Athearn had and current has again a TOFC car with a Reading flat, so you might be right, I;m sure they used the same base molds for multiple cars.

                            --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Sunday, June 5, 2011 8:23 AM

I think I read somewhere that it was made up by Lionel along with other action cars, and didn't have a prototype.  The diesel motor next to it is large enough to power a small town so I'm sure it wouldn't have a prototype.  Nice looking car though.

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Sunday, June 5, 2011 8:29 AM

Here's the article I had read. http://www.thortrains.net/NEVERCAR.HTM

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, June 5, 2011 12:46 PM

 The missile on a train was't pure fantasy - check out the Mobile Minuteman program. Looks an awful lot like a breakway box car mouting a missile.

                    --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    March 2009
  • From: wisconsin rapids, wi
  • 113 posts
Posted by ratdogsoo on Sunday, June 5, 2011 5:05 PM

yea, i know "tricks" was a dumb word to use. i duly respect all who operate DCC systems. maybe it is just too late for this "ol' fart" to change. i truly would love to have a train backing into a siding, while another passes slowly by and so on. but CV settings???? and the rest confound me. maybe some advice on a reasonably priced SIMPLE to operate DCC system. so i can have the best of both worlds as they say. info welcome. yep, i might still drive a '78 Chevy P/U, but i did invest in this PC to get input from all you fellow modelers. you have taught me well. any suggestions on a DCC system would be welcome. by the way, my lionel stuff rests in a "junk box" until this day. memories linger. regards, michael. DOB: march 1837. [just kidding].

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Sunday, June 5, 2011 5:27 PM

Well as far as CV's, remember they're all set for you at the factory. With my Digitrax Zephyr when I get a new engine and put a decoder in it (or buy one with a decoder installed), here's what I do: I put the engine on the programming track, and read the loco / decoder four-digit ID no. It should come up "0003". If it does, it means there are no shorts or other problems with the decoder. Then I punch in the ID no. I want for the engine (the no. on the engine, like 3489) and hit the program button.

That's it. The other CV's are set at the factory, and I can put it on the layout and run the engine on DCC.

Now later you can go back and change CV's to add momentum, change lighting effects etc. But you don't HAVE to change the CVs to run trains.

Stix
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, June 5, 2011 5:31 PM

 Can't get away from it. You HAVE to have a unique address for every DCC loco, otherwise it will function no differently than a single cab DC system. If you can figure out how to use a computer and post on this forum, you can do the basics needed for DCC. The 'extras' are just that, extras, and aren't needed to be able to run trains with DCC.  But that stuff lets you do things like fine tune the operation of each loco for exactly the speed and momentum and so forth that you want. And if you take the loco to a friend's house, it still runs the same way as you set it, because the settings are stored in the loco, not the controller.

                  --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    May 2002
  • From: Massachusetts
  • 2,899 posts
Posted by Paul3 on Sunday, June 5, 2011 10:43 PM

ratdogsoo,
As the other two above have said, CV settings are, for the most part, "Extras".  Think of your '78 Chevy.  When you bought it from the dealer, it ran just fine from the factory.  All you had to do was attach your unique identifier (IOW, your license plate).  After that, all you needed to do was put the key in it, start it, and drive.  Viola!  All the pleasures of driving were yours and you didn't need to be a mechanic to experience it.  But say you wanted to get a little something extra out of your Chevy...say a custom exhaust, or new suspension, or messing with the carb.?  You need to know what you're doing for that as it's not something for beginners.  None of that is needed just to drive your car, but it can make your car more fun to drive.

Compare that to DCC.  When you buy it from the "dealer", it's ready to go from the factory.  All you have to do is change the address of the decoder (your license plate, as it were).  All you need to do after that is turn on the system, select it with your throttle, and off you go.  Viola!  All the pleasures of independant locomotive control are yours and you don't need to be a computer programmer to experience it.  But say you want to get a little something extra out of your decoder-equipped engine...say a custom momentum effect, or some operating lighting features such as ditch lights or beacons, or a total speed curve to match it to another locomotive you have by a different manufacturer?  That's what CV's are for.  You need to know what you're doing for that as it's not something for beginners.  None of that is needed just to operate your loco on DCC, but it can make your loco more fun to operate.

Paul A. Cutler III

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Monday, June 6, 2011 10:06 AM

The various systems have manuals that describe how to change CV's.  CV's are just numbers you pick from a range of values that each CV is programmed to have.  For QSI sound decoders, the range of values, from loudest volume to essentially unheard is 1-15.  You pick the number that suits your ears in the space where the locomotive is operating.  That's it!

I had the same misgivings as you when I first began to think maybe DCC would be a good way to go.  The idea of doing 'programming' is what throws most of us off because we leave that to the pros in the computer world.  Well, those pros have thought of the difficulties and have made them push-button simple for us...like the push-button automatic transmissions of yesteryear.

Think of CV's the way you think of the sharps and flats keys on a piano keyboard.  They aren't absolutely necessary for composition and for later enjoyment.  But what a world of difference any one of those keys makes to music for those who appreciate all that music can be.

Crandell

  • Member since
    March 2009
  • From: wisconsin rapids, wi
  • 113 posts
Posted by ratdogsoo on Monday, June 6, 2011 4:27 PM

thanks to all for the insight. excellent  perspectives from you guys who have "climbed the hill" so to speak, into some really interesting model railroading. i quess i was just too darn stubborn to join the "tech world".  sounds very easy in fact. just need to know your favs on DCC manufacturers. reasonably priced and simple to use. i do want a quality system, not some "oh yea, it'll work ok" deal. i run QSI Quantum for the most part. have a couple of BLI's. i use the DC Master for sound. now that i think about it, i could chuck all these control boxes if i just had a decent DCC control. ok guys, lead the way. i know this link has all i need to my questions and everyone's personal favorite. but the more input the better. thanks from the "ol' fart". regards, michael.

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • From: Indiana
  • 3,549 posts
Posted by Flashwave on Sunday, June 12, 2011 11:54 PM

ratdogsoo

thanks to all for the insight. excellent  perspectives from you guys who have "climbed the hill" so to speak, into some really interesting model railroading. i quess i was just too darn stubborn to join the "tech world".  sounds very easy in fact. just need to know your favs on DCC manufacturers. reasonably priced and simple to use. i do want a quality system, not some "oh yea, it'll work ok" deal. i run QSI Quantum for the most part. have a couple of BLI's. i use the DC Master for sound. now that i think about it, i could chuck all these control boxes if i just had a decent DCC control. ok guys, lead the way. i know this link has all i need to my questions and everyone's personal favorite. but the more input the better. thanks from the "ol' fart". regards, michael.

NCE and Digitrax are basically the only things to consider, and the closest things to bulletproof* as DCC systems come. Beyond that, the real decider is which one you can get cheaper and if you have friends who run one or the other, in which case you can take the throttle over to their place and use it. If you run on your own, that's a moot point.

*Note, as will all computers, I do not reccomend hiding behind your DCC system when being shot at...

-Morgan

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!