Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

The NCE Snap-its work!!!

1089 views
3 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
The NCE Snap-its work!!!
Posted by Motley on Monday, September 20, 2010 3:57 PM

I got some of the NCE Snap-its today, and they work!!! I just finished programming them, and I tested shorting the system to see if they lose there address, and they did NOT.

So I don't think I'm going to go through the trouble of hooking up a seperate accessory bus.

I'm just glad to finally have a system that when powered up, my switches don't get thrown.

I'm happy again now. I should have went with the NCE's in the first place, since I have the PHP.

I shipped off some of the free DS64s to members here that wanted them. I'm curious to see if they have the same issues. I'm starting to think it's the combination I have.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Monday, September 20, 2010 4:08 PM

Good Luck with them.  They do work good but if you have an issue there is a fix.

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Monday, September 20, 2010 9:30 PM

 I still recommend the accessory bus, even if you don't use a dedicated booster. Not so much to prevent loss of address information, but back to the "if you run into a turnout the wrong way" sort of short. Simple way to clear the short - throw the switch the right way. Oops but the power is shorted, so it's 0-5-0 time to drag the train backwards to clear the short and try again.  Like the way I described in the PM, but the wires that go to the accessory booster become your accessory bus instead (eliminating the extra booster).

                             --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Monday, September 20, 2010 10:26 PM

rrinker

 I still recommend the accessory bus, even if you don't use a dedicated booster. Not so much to prevent loss of address information, but back to the "if you run into a turnout the wrong way" sort of short. Simple way to clear the short - throw the switch the right way. Oops but the power is shorted, so it's 0-5-0 time to drag the train backwards to clear the short and try again.  Like the way I described in the PM, but the wires that go to the accessory booster become your accessory bus instead (eliminating the extra booster).

                             --Randy

Good point Randy. I may have to revisit this then. Right now I've been clearing the shorts with the big hand anyways, not that big of a deal. I seem to get derails when going through a closed switch. But I agree with you it would be easier to throw the switch back.

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!