Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Heavyweight Duplex Sleeper Cars???

10288 views
16 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2015
  • 1,358 posts
Posted by SouthPenn on Friday, March 20, 2020 11:58 AM

I believe some of the problems with building a dome car was making curved glass that was strong and had good visual qualities. The automobile industry didn't get it right until the 1950s.

South Penn
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,439 posts
Posted by dknelson on Friday, March 20, 2020 11:48 AM

While paging through my copy of the 1937 Car Builder's Cyclopedia, I came across a couple of pictures that are worthy of mention. 

1937 was still in the early years of streamlining passenger cars and there are some really unusual examples from those days.  Maybe they've been offered in brass but for the kitbasher who is willing to "come close" to precise accuracy there are ideas aplenty in that 1937 Cyc.  (Some unusual freight cars too).

Anyway ...

There is a photo of a two-unit Pullman articulated sleeper/observation made of aluminum alloy where the sleeper section is duplex.  Full width diaphragm is over the center truck so it looks seamless and very sleek.  Three 4-wheel trucks.   Photo is too small and blurred to make out the name or names given the car(s).  Could it be that the Pennsy acquired Pullman's demonstration set "Advance" and "Progress?"  Interior shots show the stairs leading to the second level, and what looks like a quite cramped lower level sleeping compartment.  

As for the streamlined duplex sleeper it looks surprisingly similar to another photo in the 1937 volume: a Long Island Railroad "semi-double deck aluminum suburban passenger car."  Seating capacity 120.  Built by the Pennsy of course.  (edited post - presumably the same Long Island car mentioned earlier by another poster).

Dave Nelson

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: St. Paul
  • 823 posts
Posted by garya on Thursday, March 19, 2020 3:24 PM

Thanks.  Mine is Pullman green, with "Santa Fe," in the letterboard area and a small number "146" (iirc) centered.  I'll have to strip those numbers and get gold "PULLMAN" and small "EVENTIDE" or "NOCTURNE" decals.  

I wasn't a PRR modeler, but I built a Bowser E6 and then a K4, and I need something for them to pull...

Gary

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,367 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Wednesday, March 18, 2020 8:01 PM

garya
I don't suppose you know how they were lettered in the different time periods?

I have six photos (two in color) showing in a Fall, 2015 issue of the PRRT&HS Keystone. All six photos show gold extended PULLMAN lettering and the car name centered below the windows. No striping.

The cars may have been relettered in buff color but since they were both scrapped in '56 they may not have been relettered.

 Pullman_Eventide by Edmund, on Flickr

Pullman Co.

Good Luck, Ed

 

 

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: St. Paul
  • 823 posts
Posted by garya on Wednesday, March 18, 2020 3:49 PM

gmpullman

 

 
garya
Should it be Tuscan for the PRR,

 

Yes.

* Further research reveals that as rebuilt in 1931, the cars wore Pullman Green.

At their first shopping in Buffalo, February, 1937, the cars were then painted PRR Tuscan Red. They wore the red until May 1, 1951 when they were repainted to Pullmamn Green and leased back to the Pullman Company.

The cars primarily saw service between New York and Washington D.C. on trains 102 and 103. After 1951 the cars were used in standby, charter or overflow service until being removed from service in May of 1956, and scrapped at Altoona, in December, '56. 

Regards, Ed

 

Thanks Ed.  I was going to go buy some Tuscan red...now on hold.

I don't suppose you know how they were lettered in the different time periods? 

Gary

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,367 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Sunday, March 15, 2020 2:55 PM

garya
Should it be Tuscan for the PRR,

Yes.

* Further research reveals that as rebuilt in 1931, the cars wore Pullman Green.

At their first shopping in Buffalo, February, 1937, the cars were then painted PRR Tuscan Red. They wore the red until May 1, 1951 when they were repainted to Pullmamn Green and leased back to the Pullman Company.

The cars primarily saw service between New York and Washington D.C. on trains 102 and 103. After 1951 the cars were used in standby, charter or overflow service until being removed from service in May of 1956, and scrapped at Altoona, in December, '56. 

Regards, Ed

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: St. Paul
  • 823 posts
Posted by garya on Saturday, March 14, 2020 4:20 PM

Alexxx

                  Answer to the AHM heavyweight duplex sleeper question:

   The Pullman company rebuilt two heavyweight bagg/club cars into 16 room duplex sleepers of plan 4029, diagram 89 for the PRR in 1933. They were named NOCTURNE (#8572) and EVENTIDE (#8571). They are the cars that AHM built in HO scale, which they incorrectly numbered as 118.

   I have a picture of the Nocturne taken in 1959. It looks identical to the AHM model. The car numbers don't appear to have been applied, but they were numbered in the books. The name PULLMAN is also in the center on the name board rather than the name Pennsylvainia. "Pennsylvania" was applied in much smaller letters near the car ends.

   The cars were an experiment which eventually lead to the light weight era duplex sleepers. According to what was told to me by a Pullman car historian and expert- the Eventide and Nocturne were used on the slow overnight passenger/mail train between NY Penn Station and Washington DC. A reciprocal train ran in the opposite direction during the same hours. That's why there were two such cars- one car travelling in each direction.

    Both cars were retired in May,1956 and sat in Northumberland yard for years before they were scrapped.

    To model one of the cars all you need to do is remove the car number 118 and apply one of the names to it. You can also remove the road name and apply the Pullman name to it.

    Pullman did not create any of these cars for any other railroad. Only the Pennsy got them. AHM obviously wanted to make a good return on their product so they made them with other road names.

 

I got one in Pullman green, lettered for the Santa Fe.  Should it be Tuscan for the PRR, or is green correct?

Gary

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Canada, eh?
  • 13,375 posts
Posted by doctorwayne on Wednesday, February 19, 2020 4:20 PM

I picked-up two of those duplex sleepers from a now-closed hobbyshop, for not more than a couple of bucks each.  One was lettered for PULLMAN, with smaller lettering for Wabash, while the other was a Canadian Pacific car, name Revelstoke.  They were somewhat unusual, as the underbody was removeable, rather than the roof

Of course, I made them even more unusual by shortening one of the underbodies somewhat and using it under another kitbashed car, but also swiped the non-duplex-side windows to create a totally different car for a friend.

If anybody wants them to create a duplex sleeper with a centre aisle, contact me via PM.

Wayne

  • Member since
    February 2011
  • 5 posts
Posted by Alexxx on Wednesday, February 19, 2020 3:17 PM

                  Answer to the AHM heavyweight duplex sleeper question:

   The Pullman company rebuilt two heavyweight bagg/club cars into 16 room duplex sleepers of plan 4029, diagram 89 for the PRR in 1933. They were named NOCTURNE (#8572) and EVENTIDE (#8571). They are the cars that AHM built in HO scale, which they incorrectly numbered as 118.

   I have a picture of the Nocturne taken in 1959. It looks identical to the AHM model. The car numbers don't appear to have been applied, but they were numbered in the books. The name PULLMAN is also in the center on the name board rather than the name Pennsylvainia. "Pennsylvania" was applied in much smaller letters near the car ends.

   The cars were an experiment which eventually lead to the light weight era duplex sleepers. According to what was told to me by a Pullman car historian and expert- the Eventide and Nocturne were used on the slow overnight passenger/mail train between NY Penn Station and Washington DC. A reciprocal train ran in the opposite direction during the same hours. That's why there were two such cars- one car travelling in each direction.

    Both cars were retired in May,1956 and sat in Northumberland yard for years before they were scrapped.

    To model one of the cars all you need to do is remove the car number 118 and apply one of the names to it. You can also remove the road name and apply the Pullman name to it.

    Pullman did not create any of these cars for any other railroad. Only the Pennsy got them. AHM obviously wanted to make a good return on their product so they made them with other road names.

    As for the Wayfarer and the Voyager- they were rebuilt in 1931. They were another two-of-a-kind. Pullman built those only for the Pennsy as well. I don't know anything more about their history.

JW

 

 
NWP SWP

Thanks! And is it true that heavyweights weren't made into domes because the walls weren't strong enough to support the weight of the dome?

 

 

 
If anything, I'd think the walls of heavyweight cars would have been stronger than lightweight streamlined cars? Still, it's irrelevent. Key factor was timing. IIRC the idea of doing a vistadome didn't come along until about 1945. By that time construction of new heavyweight cars had ended sometime back - in the 1930's or perhaps even earlier. Any railroad buying new cars c. 1949 would be buying new streamlined cars, not outmoded heavyweight cars. So, I'm sure you could have built a heavyweight dome car, but by the time domes were thought about, the heavyweight era (at least from a production standpoint) was over.
 

[/quote]

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Monday, October 23, 2017 8:57 AM

NWP SWP

Thanks! And is it true that heavyweights weren't made into domes because the walls weren't strong enough to support the weight of the dome?

 
If anything, I'd think the walls of heavyweight cars would have been stronger than lightweight streamlined cars? Still, it's irrelevent. Key factor was timing. IIRC the idea of doing a vistadome didn't come along until about 1945. By that time construction of new heavyweight cars had ended sometime back - in the 1930's or perhaps even earlier. Any railroad buying new cars c. 1949 would be buying new streamlined cars, not outmoded heavyweight cars. So, I'm sure you could have built a heavyweight dome car, but by the time domes were thought about, the heavyweight era (at least from a production standpoint) was over.
Stix
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,367 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Monday, October 23, 2017 12:17 AM

NWP SWP
I heard that from Wikipedia.

Yep, I read it... but I'm not in agreement with it.

If Pullman can sheath the sides of U.S. No. 1 the Ferdinand Magellan, with 5/8" steel plate and 3" thick windows certainly— if there was a need — they could have beefed up some structural members in order to add a glass-top to a heavyweight car. 

https://www.nps.gov/nr/travel/presidents/us_car_number_one.html

Perhaps the development of tempered safety glass had some inroads to the development of dome cars more than the strength of steels available?

Regards, Ed

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • 2,980 posts
Posted by NWP SWP on Sunday, October 22, 2017 11:26 PM

I heard that from Wikipedia.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passenger_car_(rail)

Go to the "history" section scroll down to the last paragraph of "lightweight vs heavyweight"

Steve

If everything seems under control, you're not going fast enough!

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,367 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Sunday, October 22, 2017 11:17 PM

NWP SWP
And is it true that heavyweights weren't made into domes because the walls weren't strong enough to support the weight of the dome?

Never heard that explanation before. The Canadian Pacific had several "Birdcage" wood dome cars in the 1890's.

The modern-day (i.e. streamliner-era) dome car probably came from the desire to try to attract passengers to keep riding passenger trains after the post-war increase in competition from automobiles and airlines.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dome_car

During the heavyweight era, I believe the railroad saw their mission as providing transportation for the masses, not so much as a scenic experience. There were solarium-observation cars, of course, as the open-end observation car fell out of favor with travelers as the higher speeds made for a rather uncomfortable experience not to mention inclement weather.

Thank You,

Ed

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • 2,980 posts
Posted by NWP SWP on Sunday, October 22, 2017 10:23 PM

Thanks! And is it true that heavyweights weren't made into domes because the walls weren't strong enough to support the weight of the dome?

Steve

If everything seems under control, you're not going fast enough!

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,439 posts
Posted by dknelson on Sunday, October 22, 2017 3:32 PM

I have AHM/Rivarossi "duplex" sleeping cars in Pennsy paint and lettering for both standard and modern eras.  The modern era is the Morrow Brook - there was a Brook series of streamlined duplex sleepers on the Pennsy and this is one of them.

The standard era car is just numbered 118.  No name.

Arthur D Dubin's book Some Classic Trains has a photo and floor plan of the standard (6 axle heavyweight) duplex sleepers that the Pennsy created in 1932 by rebuilding two composite club cars.  Those cars were named Eventide and Nocturne.  16 duplex single rooms.  It is quite similar to the AHM car and I assume is the prototype for it.  

AHM/Rivarossi offered those models in a variety of roadnames but I believe the PRR is authentic.

Dave Nelson

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,367 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Sunday, October 22, 2017 1:30 PM

The Pennsylvania Railroad built (or actually converted) at least two sleeping cars, The "Wanderer" and The "Voyager" which had staggered sleeping berths. 

Another pair "Eventide" and "Nocturne" were also built as experimentals. Maybe these were the basis for the AHM model.

The PRR built MP70 coaches for use on the Long Island Railroad, which might be what the AHM model represents. These were the prototypes for the later bi-level commuter cars still in use today. I believe there were 52 built.

 

 http://rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=4032263

 

Good Luck, Ed

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • 2,980 posts
Heavyweight Duplex Sleeper Cars???
Posted by NWP SWP on Sunday, October 22, 2017 1:26 PM

Was there ever heavyweight duplex sleeper cars? I have seen some HO scale models on eBay are these just fantasy models or of an actual prototype???

Here are two for sale right now:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/222676511566

http://www.ebay.com/itm/302463241252

Steve

If everything seems under control, you're not going fast enough!

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!