Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

40's-50's Rolling Stock

3977 views
13 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • 202 posts
40's-50's Rolling Stock
Posted by rlandry6 on Sunday, July 10, 2005 12:20 PM
I'm building a free-lance n scale layout, 40's-50's and maybe into the early60's, mostly steam and the early diesels like the Alco RS's. I'm assuming the 'Super Chief" will fit in nicely also. What types of rolling stock, boxcars, flatcars, tankers, reefers, etc. were common in this era? What do I need to avoid? My layout will be a relatively small around the room, folding dogbone. I'll end up with a few sharp curves, but I'll hide most of the worst offenders behind scenery. because of this. I'll stay mainly on short rolling stock,40-50 feet.
Were there many steam powered passenger trins during this period. What steam loce were prevalent during that time. I have one Mikado now and I want to add more steam as it progresses. Any sugesstions there? What were some of the shorter passenger cars of this era that would look decent on a layout with a few sharp curves. I'm scenery driven, so my main concern is that trains run well, and look good on the layout, so as of now, I'm not planning on counting rivets. Any advice here would be greatly appreciated.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,216 posts
Posted by davekelly on Sunday, July 10, 2005 1:22 PM
Perhaps the Kalmbach book modeling the 50's will help. Haven't seen it yet, although I have one on order.
If you ain't having fun, you're not doing it right and if you are having fun, don't let anyone tell you you're doing it wrong.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Minnesota
  • 659 posts
Posted by ericboone on Sunday, July 10, 2005 5:48 PM
For passenger cars, stick with 70ft cars and avoid the 85ft cars.
For steamers, about anything goes in that time frame. Just keep in mind that a shortline is not likely going to have anything larger than a Mikado and a large line will have retired anything smaller (and older) that a Consolidation. In other words, a shortline is unlikely to have a Big Boy or a Challenger while a major railroad will likely have already retired its Atlantics, Ten Wheelers, and Moguls. If your modeling a shortline or a branchline, a Consolidation or a Mikado would be very appropriate. Considering that you have tight curves, I would avoid anything bigger than a Mikado anyway.
  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: North Idaho
  • 1,311 posts
Posted by jimrice4449 on Sunday, July 10, 2005 6:32 PM
I checked your profile and it doesn't show what area of the country you're from so I'll be general. It sounds like you're more interested in the late fifties end of the transition era so you'd want to have predominately steel cars. Wood cars lasted through WWII but as soon as they could most RRs retired them in favor of steel. 40' box cars would still predominate but 50' would be comming on strong. Most tank cars would be 40' w/ full underframes. Stock cars were still in use but their days were numbered. Depending on your prototype preferences wooden cabooses could still be used, although most would be steel, some bay window but mostly cupola (no wide vision w/ very few exceptions, none of which look at all like current WV crummies)
As far as psgr goes you have much latitude. I think the GTW ran steam commuter out of Detroit (behind Pacifics and Northerns) until 1960. The SP used steam in commuter service well into the late 50's. In HO Walthers offers some shorty psgr cars that are C&NW prototype (I think they're 70' but they could be 60'). Again in HO but possibly available in N are Roundhouse models of the Harriman (turtle back roof) carsThey're 60' which is slightly shorter that prototype, but "look right". For power you could emulate the SP and GTW and go w/ Northerns or use Pacifics. Psgr diesels could be any road untit (E or F) or GP or Alco RS.
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • 202 posts
Posted by rlandry6 on Monday, July 11, 2005 5:46 PM
I'm in Texas, and the area I'm interested in would be that covered by Southern Pacific ,Santa Fe and about any of the Western roads. I rose the Southern Pacific Sunset Limited when I was a kid, and that just kinda stuck with me. Which passenger cars would be the shortest in Nscale for that era. The catalogues and websites seem to be a little sparse on that information. I'll probably switch between diesel and steam passenger
  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Corpus Christi, Texas
  • 2,377 posts
Posted by leighant on Monday, July 11, 2005 5:57 PM
Here are references to plans of Southern Pacific passenger train cars. Except for RPO and Express cards, nearly all passenger cars were 80' or longer in 1940-50-60 era.

Express Box 5700-5714 (40' AAR-design boxcar)
1964 pix at Dallas RailModJournal Dec89 p.45

mail car 40' Harriman roof, plans MR Feb50 p.46

baggage car 60' Harriman roof, plans MR Feb50 p.46

Baggage car "economy model" of 1960s _Mod RRer_ Sept93 p.74

Baggage-mail 63' Harriman roof, plans _Mod RRer_ Oct52 p.68

RPO-storage mail 60-BP-30-1 _RMC_ Aug88 p.74

RPO-coach combine 60-cp-15-1 _RMC_ Aug88 p.74

Coach 60' Harriman, 60-C-5 class, plan _RMC_ Aug88 p.73

Dining car, plans _Mod RRer_ Oct52 p.68

Sleeper 6-3 heavywt "Glen Major" SP
proto pix _RailModelJournal_ Dec97 p.49

Sleeper 8-5 heavywt "Clover Gem" SP
proto pix _RailModelJournal_ Dec97 p.49

Sleeper for Sunset Limited _RMC_ Nov72 p.,52

Sleeper 10-6 Sunset Ltd blt 1950 MR June89 p.81

Sleeper 10-6 blt PS 1950 RMC Jul72 p.38

Sleeper 13 bedroom heavywt "Night Ferm" SP
proto pix _RailModelJournal_ Dec97 p.49
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 15, 2005 5:43 PM
Originally posted by rlandry6

I'm building a free-lance n scale layout, 40's-50's and maybe into the early60's, mostly steam and the early diesels like the Alco RS's. I'm assuming the 'Super Chief" will fit in nicely also. What types of rolling stock, boxcars, flatcars, tankers, reefers, etc. were common in this era? What do I need to avoid? My layout will be a relatively small around the room, folding dogbone. I'll end up with a few sharp curves, but I'll hide most of the worst offenders behind scenery. because of this. I'll stay mainly on short rolling stock,40-50 feet.


rlandry6,
either research a road or region, and build from there.
The last era of steam you will find bigger, high stepping locos in your part of the country *unless* you are specifying a branch or local only service layout.

Go with freight equipment first then worry about flash pasenger service.
Your buying opportunities will be many and without defining your criteria you will probably make less accurate buys than you will later want.

My idea is to go with a road, or roads, aim first for 30% home road equipment and locally served industry, or switching types and slowly build off road traffic.
If you are mainly running trains then spectacular ATSF stars and SP freight drags behind the biggest steam and early diesel consists will look best.

There were plenty of 50' cars (like automobile) in the 40's so dont generalise on eras. 'Boxcar red/brown and freight car red' will dominate (if you want) against yellow/ orange shade reefers-wood and steel.
Hope this helps,
dave [;)]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 11, 2005 9:30 AM
One thing to avoid is boxcars without walkways on the top (a mistake I made years ago and have since corrected) . The walkways didn't start disappearing until the mid-late 60s, if memory serves, so any cars from the 40s and 50s would have them.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Martinez, CA
  • 5,440 posts
Posted by markpierce on Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:52 AM
The SP ran "little engines" until the end of steam (1956). This included 0-6-0s and 2-6-0s, plus lots of 2-8-0s. The last two 4-8-0s were still on the roster in 1953 and were located in Bayshore (near San Francisco) and Eugene, Oregon. These little engines were in service longer than many larger and more modern ones. For many assignments, the smaller engines were more suitable than the larger ones.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:58 AM
Here's a link to a good reference site for rolling stock in your planned era-

http://railroad.union.rpi.edu/

Doug
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 11, 2005 12:07 PM
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, August 23, 2005 9:57 PM
I've had a similar question re. appropriate rolling stock, but a slightly later era. I'd like to stay as close as possible to the transition era so that I can run some mainline steam, but I have some GP-38s. What year did GP-38s arrive? (I know I'm stretching the trransition era). If I model the year the GP-38s arrived, what rolling stock features do I need to avoid? For instance, when did plug-doors appear?, covered hoppers?, centerflow covered hoppers?, cushioned-underframe boxcars?, boxcars and reefers exceeding 50'?, tankcars exceeding 41'?, actual wide-vision cupola cabooses? Obviously paint-schemes for later mergers and new shortlines have to be avoided also, but when did existing RRs change their paint-schemes? Oh, this does get complex!.
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Tuesday, August 23, 2005 11:19 PM
GP38's are 1970's vintage, GP38-2's are late 1970's vintage.

Plug doors appeared in the 50's.
Covered hoppers for specialty service in the 1930's, commonly in the 1960's.
Centerflow hoppers in the mid 1960's.
Cushion underframed boxcars in the 1930's, the type you are probably asking about in the 1960's.
Boxcars exceeding 50' in the early 1900's, commonly in the late fifties, early 60's.
Same with large tankcars.
Wide vision cabooses were a late 50's, early 60's thing.
Paint schemes changed all over the place and you would have to do a lot of research to come up with a definitive answer.

GPP38's are flat not prototypical for a steam era pike. Not saying you can't run them but real railroads didn't operate regular revenue steam and GP38's. Ever.
Virtually all the cars you asked about were never coupled into a steam engine.

Most steam operation was over by and the railroads dieselized by the mid to late1950's. F units, RS1, 2, 3 units, GP7's and early diesel switchers would all be appropriate as well as E6,7,8 and 9 units, DL109's and PA's.

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: North Idaho
  • 1,311 posts
Posted by jimrice4449 on Wednesday, August 24, 2005 10:46 AM
For an SP fan w/ sharp curves and an itch for psgr trains, the Roundhouse Harriman cars are the solution. I'm assuming they're available in N. As far as small steam engines go, the SP used 2-6-0s in the San Joaquin Valley (picture a billiard table w/ tan felt) up to the end of steam. They called them "Valley Mallies" because of the size trains they could pull in that flat terrain. The roundhouse coaches are a reasonable compromise for SF commute cars so you could run a batch of them behind a GS-4
4-8-4 if you hanker after long trains of short cars.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!