Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Santa Fe's tender abbreviations

1999 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2019
  • 27 posts
Santa Fe's tender abbreviations
Posted by Oregon Pacific on Wednesday, December 23, 2020 8:41 AM

Hello and Seasons Greetings fellow model railroad enthusiast! Can anyone answer this question?  On the rear of Santa Fe's steam locomotive tenders are stenciled data markings like 10000 G. W. for Gross Weight.  What is meant by the abbreviation 3129 G. O. S. 543?  Many thanks and everyone be safe out there.      

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southeast Texas
  • 5,449 posts
Posted by mobilman44 on Wednesday, December 23, 2020 8:59 AM

I believe "10,000 GW" is "gallons of water".  The other number may well refer to gallons of oil.

ENJOY  !

 

Mobilman44

 

Living in southeast Texas, formerly modeling the "postwar" Santa Fe and Illinois Central 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Wednesday, December 23, 2020 9:09 AM

Isn't 3129 the class number (here, a 2-8-2)?  EDIT - a number of ATSF tenders were converted from coal to oil and the 'new' capacity is the number of gallons corresponding, net of tank construction, to that weight.  The Madam Queen 5000 had 27 tons and after conversion shows 7107 gallons.  So having a 'weird' number of gallons may be likely here.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,367 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Wednesday, December 23, 2020 9:49 AM

Just a hunch,

The 3129 is gallons of oil then a hyphen S 543 meaning steam cleaned in May of 1943? Their coal tenders do not have the S-xxx stencil, just the weight capacity of coal.

Bunker C fuel gets tar deposits and gunk built up. Maybe Santa Fe stencils the clean out date.

Just a wild guess.

Cheers, Ed

  • Member since
    October 2019
  • 27 posts
Posted by Oregon Pacific on Sunday, December 27, 2020 9:34 AM

That makes sense, Ed!  Thanks for the insite.  

  • Member since
    October 2019
  • 27 posts
Posted by Oregon Pacific on Sunday, December 27, 2020 9:38 AM

Appreciate the conversion from coal to oil on SF locomotives.  That seems logical.  

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!