Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Baldwin Sharknose Dynamic Brakes

2210 views
10 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,176 posts
Baldwin Sharknose Dynamic Brakes
Posted by mvlandsw on Friday, November 8, 2019 12:16 AM

Did the PRR BP20 Baldwin passenger units and the sharknose freight units have dynamic brakes?

Mark Vinski

  • Member since
    December 2014
  • 443 posts
Posted by Wolf359 on Friday, November 8, 2019 1:29 PM

According to Wikipedia, none of these locomotives ever came equipped with dynamic brakes. But, there may be someone else out there with more knowledge of these locos that could confirm if this is true or not.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Huntsville, AR
  • 1,250 posts
Posted by oldline1 on Friday, November 8, 2019 8:35 PM

I don't knowabout the BP-20s but according to this the RF-16s had them.

https://www.american-rails.com/rf16.html

oldline1

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 216 posts
Posted by KemacPrr on Friday, November 8, 2019 9:13 PM

Mark all the freight Sharks BF-15 and 16 on the PRR had dynamic brakes. The passenger sharks the BP-20's did not. Also the Centipedes did not have dynamic brakes. ----   Ken 

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • From: Duluth, MN
  • 424 posts
Posted by OT Dean on Saturday, November 9, 2019 12:28 AM

oldline1

I don't knowabout the BP-20s but according to this the RF-16s had them.

https://www.american-rails.com/rf16.html

oldline1

 

I recall reading somewhere that the only thing that put off a lot of potential buyers was the fact that the Sharknoses used a different transition mechanism that wouldn't MU with EMD, Alco, and F-M.  I think I later read that at least one road replaced the Baldwin transition units and replaced them with EMD units.  However, as usual, my memory often leaves much to be desired...

Deano

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,326 posts
Posted by Overmod on Saturday, November 9, 2019 9:10 AM

The MU incompatibility with Sharks was far more related to their throttle controls.  Most Baldwins used an air throttle that was incompatible with 8-notch Woodward-governor relay control, and only relatively late in production did Baldwin offer an 'electric' MU option.

Transition is more of an internal function on locomotives; the concern  in MU support being for manual up and down on the trailing units, and that could have been provided relatively easily as contactor/relay control -- had the throttle issue been addressed first.

We might recall the fiasco with newly-surplus E units on PRR while the BP20s were still nearly new:  freight engineers expected automatic back transition not on passenger engines, and it wasn't too long before TrucTrains were making unscheduled stops in Flashover City...

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,326 posts
Posted by Overmod on Saturday, November 9, 2019 9:22 AM

The issue of dynamics on BP20s is a bit more complicated.  As far as I know, none had them even experimentally, perhaps due in part to concern over excessive wheelslide on A-1-A trucks in that era.

But the whole splendid history of these engines on the Long Branch service would have been greatly enhanced with proper dynamics, something explicitly said to me by one of the men who loved running them.  The test conversion to 'freight' power would certainly have benefited from at least some DB capability of its own, and the same is true for the documented freight use of the B units after the A's went East.  Hopefully someone like Allen or Will is going to read this and comment.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 1,855 posts
Posted by angelob6660 on Saturday, November 9, 2019 9:46 AM

KemacPrr

Also the Centipedes did not have dynamic brakes. 

 
 
It's weird that the centipedes didn't have dynamic braking since they helped freight trains over/ around Horseshoe Curve.

Modeling the G.N.O. Railway, The Diamond Route.

Amtrak America, 1971-Present.

  • Member since
    April 2019
  • From: Pacific Northwest
  • 780 posts
Posted by SPSOT fan on Saturday, November 9, 2019 10:10 AM

Yes, but remember that the centipedes were originally intended for the top PRR passenger trains, until unreliability bumped them into helper service. Therefore, in their original intended purpose, dynamic breaks where not really necessary.

Regards, Isaac

I model my railroad and you model yours! I model my way and you model yours!

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Monday, November 11, 2019 9:36 AM

 The way I've always understood it, from both literature (susepct of course) and accounts from those who ran them, the Baldwin air throttles incorporated an anti-slip system, so even rather rough handling wouldn't cause wheel slip - instead, maximum power was apllied to the limit of adhesion without having to feather the throttle. In a way, the Baldwin system was ahead of its time. ANd of course, different from the others so misunderstood and unloved by railroads who liked to have everything the same.

                                   --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Northfield Center TWP, OH
  • 2,510 posts
Posted by dti406 on Monday, November 11, 2019 9:36 AM

SPSOT fan

Yes, but remember that the centipedes were originally intended for the top PRR passenger trains, until unreliability bumped them into helper service. Therefore, in their original intended purpose, dynamic breaks where not really necessary.

 

I remember reading an article in Trains on the Centipedes, and the shop forces at the end of the Centipede era avoided changing the brake shoes as there were so many of them on the locomotive and they were hard to get to.

Rick Jesionowski

Rule 1: This is my railroad.

Rule 2: I make the rules.

Rule 3: Illuminating discussion of prototype history, equipment and operating practices is always welcome, but in the event of visitor-perceived anacronisms, detail descrepancies or operating errors, consult RULE 1!

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!