Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Coupling RDC units together

1705 views
5 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2017
  • From: Southern Florida Gulf Coast
  • 18,255 posts
Coupling RDC units together
Posted by SeeYou190 on Thursday, July 11, 2019 7:15 PM

If a trainset was made of an RDC-1 coach, an RDC-2 combine, and an RDC-4 RPO, is there a "standard" way they would have been arranged?

.

Would it really matter?

.

Thanks.

.

-Kevin

.

Living the dream.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,229 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Thursday, July 11, 2019 8:39 PM

In the interest of aesthetics I would run mine with the RPO (RDC4) at one end, baggage compartment adjoining baggage compartment of the following combine (RDC2) then the (RDC1) full coach at the other end, thus:

 RDC_3unit by Edmund, on Flickr

If at all possible, the railroad (or the P.O.) prefered to have the RPO segregated from general passenger access by having baggage, express or mail storage blocking access to the mail apartment.

Good Luck, Ed

* I mistakenly used an RDC4 in the example, but you get the idea, I hope Embarrassed

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: AU
  • 708 posts
Posted by xdford on Thursday, July 11, 2019 8:51 PM

Having grown up in South Australia, I tend to use the old SA Railways edict of the baggage end facing Adelaide. The SAR had RDC-2 (250 class) and RDC-4 (280 class) lookalikes as power cars while the RDC1 type cars (100 class)were trailers known universally as Bluebirds. I think it esthetically looks better as well and my baggage ends face the "Eastern End" of my railway.

Because of the design and loading limits, we did not have roof top radiator domes on these cars and they were excellent riders.  We did have a comparison in that the Commonwealth Railways had 3 stock RDC1's and they were good to although a bit pedestrian in terms of desert travel.

Cheers from Australia

Trevor

 

Publicity shot of SAR Bluebirds on a Mount Gambier Train

  • Member since
    February 2015
  • 869 posts
Posted by NHTX on Thursday, July 11, 2019 9:16 PM

     My suggestion would be to put the RDC-1 between the RDC-2 and RDC-3, which would have their passenger carrying compartments coupled to the RDC-1.  This reduces the potential for people wandering through the baggage areas, and access to the postal apartment of the RDC-3 is restricted to postal employees only.  It consolidates the passenger loading/unloading points to two, speeding those processes and reducing dwell time at stops.  Better crowd control and concentration of toilet facilities in just two points.  This would be the way I would arrange them if they were to normally be operated together.

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Calgary
  • 2,043 posts
Posted by cx500 on Saturday, July 13, 2019 1:12 AM

Most likely as NHTX says, with all the passenger accommodation together and the baggage/RPO ends facing out.  That way there is no need to turn the set at the end of the run, simply turn the seats as required.

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • From: Southern Florida Gulf Coast
  • 18,255 posts
Posted by SeeYou190 on Sunday, July 14, 2019 11:37 AM

OK, I think this makes sense to put all the passenger compartments in the middle.

.

Thanks to everyone that helped out.

.

-Kevin

.

Living the dream.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!