Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Do Any Railroads Still Use 40 Ft High Cube Box Cars?

5969 views
21 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 2,475 posts
Do Any Railroads Still Use 40 Ft High Cube Box Cars?
Posted by caldreamer on Friday, November 2, 2018 9:13 PM

I have a number of N scale 40 foot high cube box cars, and as asked about the 85 footers in another thread, does any railroad still use the 40 footers.  I know that they were used to transport appliances.

 

  • Member since
    February 2015
  • 869 posts
Posted by NHTX on Saturday, November 3, 2018 3:05 AM

     Hi-cube 40 footers were a very small segment of the national car fleet during their heyday.  The advent of hi-cube 50 and 60 footers ushered in cars that were much more versatile as far as potential payloads were concerned.  By the mid 80s, the 40 footers were gone.  Since you mentioned 40 footers for appliance loading, L&N had a large number of standard height 40 foot PS-1s assigned to appliance loading at Appliance Park in Louisville, Ky, up until the very early 1980s.

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Saturday, November 3, 2018 11:56 AM

STILL use?

No.

Except maybe MoW service (could be useful).  Wander over to the Tangent website and read up on them.

They were built about 1970.  So they'd be past the "40 year rule", which would have triggered at least minimal rebuilding.  And who needs a 40' high cube box enough to spend money on it fixing it up?  Uh, nobody.

 

Ed

 

 

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,426 posts
Posted by dknelson on Saturday, November 3, 2018 12:20 PM

Maybe there would still be a need for hi cube boxcars if there were still US made appliances.  Maybe.  

Dave Nelson

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: Potomac Yard
  • 2,761 posts
Posted by NittanyLion on Saturday, November 3, 2018 12:52 PM

They'd just go into containers anyhow 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern CA Bay Area
  • 4,387 posts
Posted by cuyama on Saturday, November 3, 2018 4:59 PM

dknelson
Maybe there would still be a need for hi cube boxcars if there were still US made appliances.  Maybe.  

That would be news to the factory workers in South Carolina who built our Bosch dishwasher and those in Memphis who built our Electrolux washer and dryer. These "foreign" companies (and ongoing traditional US suppliers, such as GE) have been building appliances in the US for years.

Most (maybe all) are shipped in containers and trucks, though.

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 2,475 posts
Posted by caldreamer on Saturday, November 3, 2018 6:11 PM

My railroad has a Maytag factory on it and since I have number of these boxcars, I will probably use them.  Where  they used for any other cargo besides appliances?

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Saturday, November 3, 2018 6:51 PM

caldreamer

My railroad has a Maytag factory on it and since I have number of these boxcars, I will probably use them.  Where  they used for any other cargo besides appliances?

 

 

Another no.  If you look at the photos on the Tangent site, you'll see they all (all I looked at or own, anyway) have a "return when empty to...." marking.  So they either hauled appliances or air.

Now, AFTER they stopped hauling appliances (if they did stop), then they likely went into general service.  Or, at least, other cargo appropriate to their size and capacity.

Ed

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 8,863 posts
Posted by riogrande5761 on Saturday, November 3, 2018 7:00 PM

Caldreamer, the 1970 s is the ideal period for those box cars FWIW.

Rio Grande.  The Action Road  - Focus 1977-1983

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Canada
  • 1,819 posts
Posted by cv_acr on Saturday, November 3, 2018 9:28 PM

Appliances shipped by rail today would be in the now-standard 50'IL and 60'IL 100-ton 13'IH highcube cars like the FBOX and TBOX cars. A 70-ton 40' car is laughably obsolete at this point.

When these 40' highcubes were built in the late 1960s the standard boxcar was a 50' IL/10'IH 70-ton box. The 40' high-cube box was specialized for this service in order to load an extra layer of bulky appliances.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,771 posts
Posted by wjstix on Monday, November 5, 2018 4:30 PM

"Baby Hi-Cubes" started being built in the mid-1960's. Northern Pacific and the Burlington Route had them for several years before the BN merger (March 1970).

They were also used to haul the large (HUGE) paper rolls used by newspapers.

Stix
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Northfield Center TWP, OH
  • 2,508 posts
Posted by dti406 on Tuesday, November 6, 2018 7:55 AM

The SP Ordered 100 Ton 40' High Cubes as late as 1977 for use in hauling copper, they may still be in use on the UP, and the 40 year cutoff date without rebuilding would have been 2017.

Rick Jesionowski

Rule 1: This is my railroad.

Rule 2: I make the rules.

Rule 3: Illuminating discussion of prototype history, equipment and operating practices is always welcome, but in the event of visitor-perceived anacronisms, detail descrepancies or operating errors, consult RULE 1!

  • Member since
    February 2015
  • 869 posts
Posted by NHTX on Tuesday, November 6, 2018 4:00 PM

      The 1977 built SP 40 footers were not hi-cubes in the sense of the 40 foot appliance cars.  They were 10'6" inside height cars built to transport copper products from the smelters to other industries.  These cars were basically 50 foot PC&F (Pacific Car & Foundry) or FMC incentive per diem cars, minus ten feet of length.  Their cubic capacity was 4125 cu. ft. due to the lack of an interior wood lining, and they would be loaded to maximum tonnage long before cubic footage became an issue, unlike appliances which were low density/high bulk loads.

       The numbers, classes, builders and dates are:

                         SP 605000-605299     B-100-32      PC&F      1972

                         SP 605300-605549     B-100-32      PC&F      1974

                         SP 605550-605699     B-100-41      FMC       1977

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Tuesday, November 6, 2018 4:18 PM

And, if you want one, here's a kit:

 

https://shop.cannonandco.net/product.sc?productId=207&categoryId=21

 

Ed

 

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 8,675 posts
Posted by maxman on Wednesday, November 7, 2018 7:18 AM

On the Tangent website they have a couple circa 1983 photos with BN cars in a train.

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 8,863 posts
Posted by riogrande5761 on Wednesday, November 7, 2018 8:03 AM

Removed - I stepped into a prototype experts only topic by mistake.

Rio Grande.  The Action Road  - Focus 1977-1983

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Wednesday, November 7, 2018 10:12 AM

Jim,

 

The SP car is a Plate C car.

By definition, a high-cube car exceeds Plate C.

So the cars you're talking about will not give you a model of the SP car.

 

 

Ed

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 8,863 posts
Posted by riogrande5761 on Wednesday, November 7, 2018 12:31 PM

  Dead

Rio Grande.  The Action Road  - Focus 1977-1983

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Wednesday, November 7, 2018 12:59 PM

Well, MESSENGER,

what else can we do when he brings us a picture of what is clearly labeled a HI-CUBE car when we are talking about a PLATE C car?

They nowhere claim this is a model of the SP PLATE C (NOT HI-CUBE) anode boxes.  And the numbers don't match.

 

Ed

Moderator
  • Member since
    May 2009
  • From: Waukesha, WI
  • 1,752 posts
Posted by Steven Otte on Wednesday, November 7, 2018 2:07 PM

Knock off the sarcasm, guys.

Posts have been edited.

--
Steven Otte, Model Railroader senior associate editor
sotte@kalmbach.com

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 2,475 posts
Posted by caldreamer on Wednesday, November 7, 2018 3:47 PM

I agree with Steve.  I asked a valid question, lets keep this on the topic.

   Caldreamer

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Wednesday, November 7, 2018 3:57 PM

caldreamer

I agree with Steve.  I asked a valid question, lets keep this on the topic.

   Caldreamer

 

Caldreamer,

I think your question was answered.  So I don't see why we shouldn't wander off-topic.

Sometimes some very interesting facts and observations come up when that happens.

 

 

Ed

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!