Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Norfolk and Western

2301 views
12 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Wappingers Falls, NY / Troy, NY
  • 120 posts
Norfolk and Western
Posted by N Scale Train Boy on Friday, May 20, 2016 10:21 AM

I have an Atlas n scale model of a Norfolk and Western high hood SD35. I don't even know if this is a prototypical Norfolk and Wester locomotive, but if it is, it has an F on the long hood, designating that the long hood is the front of the locomotive. Why is this? Is it a Norfolk and western  prototype or is it a mistake on Atlas's part? I just don't know. Additionally, if it helps, the road numder on the model is 1521.

Check out the Balfour and Colucci Creek Southern Railroad, my proto-freelanced N scale model railroad, at bccsrailroad.weebly.com or on Youtube on my channel, N Scale Train Boy.

-Dennis

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: Potomac Yard
  • 2,761 posts
Posted by NittanyLion on Friday, May 20, 2016 5:53 PM

N&W had some different tastes. They liked the long hoods front, including the 35s.

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Friday, May 20, 2016 6:17 PM

Oops! Double post.

 

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Friday, May 20, 2016 6:24 PM

N&W had 80 SD35s numbers 1500-1579 and had bi directional controls so,they could be operated long or short hood forward. The bell was mounted on the short hood.

Reference photos:

http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=254900&nseq=18

 

http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=412424&nseq=3

 

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,776 posts
Posted by wjstix on Friday, May 20, 2016 9:29 PM

Many railways bought their early diesels long hood forward...GN, Southern, NYC, N&W, Pennsy, etc. Most shifted to short nose forward when low nose diesels came along c.1960. N&W and Southern kept ordering engines long hood 1st long after that, with high short hoods.

Stix
  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Friday, May 20, 2016 9:56 PM

wjstix
N&W and Southern kept ordering engines long hood 1st long after that, with high short hoods.

That I could never understand because N&W and Southern ran their engines either short or long hood forward as photos will attest. Come to think of it the majority of the photos I seen over the years the short hood was lead.

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Saturday, May 21, 2016 12:26 AM

The excuse I heard was that N&W enginemen were more comfortable with the bulk of the prime mover between them and the (fillintheblanks) dodging around he gates at grade crossings.  Visibility was at least as good as that along a steamer's boiler.

Then, too, N&W ran a lot of steam miles in reverse, backing into or out of coal-originating branches, so running in reverse was hardly unusual for the throttle jockeys.

N&W finally changed over from long hood front when the high short hood became an extra-cost option.

Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964 - with center-cab diesels)

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Saturday, May 21, 2016 6:48 AM

tomikawaTT
N&W finally changed over from long hood front when the high short hood became an extra-cost option.

Actually N&W had several low hood engines those was exNKP and Wabash GP30/35s. The N&W had one SD45 that was rebuilt with a low hood after it was involved in a wreck.

While the F may have been on the front N&W ran them either way,

According to my information long hood forward was for grade crossing protection for the crew especially in the coal fields due to the coal buckets- those are dump trucks and 18 wheelers with dump trailers that haul coal to a non rail served industry  or road to barge loading dock..

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    May 2007
  • From: North Myrtle Beach, SC
  • 995 posts
Posted by Beach Bill on Sunday, May 22, 2016 1:13 PM
With reasonable men, I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter, nor waste arguments where they will certainly be lost. William Lloyd Garrison
  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Sunday, May 22, 2016 4:12 PM

Biil,You can't see it in the photo but,the bell is mounted on the short hood.

As far as photos we could match photos for weeks showing N&W engines being ran in either direction including GP9s starting in the 60s..Laugh I studied and modeled the N&W for several years and before the flood in 07 I had over 1000 photos of locomotives,cabooses and freight cars taken in Portsmouth,Columbus and Kenova. I had photos of 611 and 1218 on their first trip into Portsmouth.

BTW. All of my engines was either in the black "hamburger scheme" with Norfolk & Western or the plan "NW" on the hood.

I had HH GP30s and GP35s. The GP30s HH was made with Bachmann shells,Cannon short HH and fitted with a Athearn GP35 shell. Three GP35s was Athearn with Cannon  short HH and the 4th was #1300 (ex-P&WV GP35 #70)..

I still have my N&W First and Second Generation Diesel books..

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,474 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Sunday, May 22, 2016 8:10 PM
I have a theory that is unprovable but I think early diesels with the exception of f, fa and rf units replicated the fact that visibility of early hood units was equal to or better than the steam engines they replaced all of which had the boiler out front so it was normal.
  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Sunday, May 22, 2016 8:34 PM

ndbprr
I have a theory that is unprovable but I think early diesels with the exception of f, fa and rf units replicated the fact that visibility of early hood units was equal to or better than the steam engines they replaced all of which had the boiler out front so it was normal.
 

C&O favored short hood forward from the start as did several other roads. B&O opt for long hood forward until their GP30s. After C&O took control of the B&O the B&O received several C&O Geeps that kept their C&O looks and numbers and was operated short hood forward. I been told that all B&O did was replace the C with  a B  and had B&O in Enchantment Blue.

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Wappingers Falls, NY / Troy, NY
  • 120 posts
Posted by N Scale Train Boy on Monday, May 23, 2016 6:27 PM

Thanks everyone. Very cool and helpful information!Smile

Check out the Balfour and Colucci Creek Southern Railroad, my proto-freelanced N scale model railroad, at bccsrailroad.weebly.com or on Youtube on my channel, N Scale Train Boy.

-Dennis

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!