Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Pullman Troop cars (couplers?)

3406 views
16 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Anaheim, CA Bayfield, CO
  • 1,829 posts
Pullman Troop cars (couplers?)
Posted by Southwest Chief on Saturday, November 14, 2015 7:07 PM

I'm trying to find out if Pullman WWII troop cars had type H tightlock couplers?

Not a lot of information online about their couplers.

 

The coupler in the pic above kind of looks like a tightlock, but very hard to tell.

Matt from Anaheim, CA and Bayfield, CO
Click Here for my model train photo website

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Jersey Shore
  • 313 posts
Posted by wojosa31 on Saturday, November 14, 2015 7:25 PM

Try this site - has all known Pullman data. If it exists, it's somewhere in here.

http://pullmanproject.com/Pullman_CCR_Text2.htm

  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: Jersey City
  • 1,925 posts
Posted by steemtrayn on Saturday, November 14, 2015 9:16 PM

I googled "Pullman troop cars" and looked at the images, and have yet to find a pic of one with tightlocks. Weren't they developed some time in the '70s?

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,367 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Saturday, November 14, 2015 9:17 PM

This site has a few pictures of the PRR built cars. 

http://www.billspennsyphotos.com/apps/photos/album?albumid=11158055

I have some specs listed in the book Trains To Victory as follows:

Cars were built in two lots totaling 2,400 cars in their Michigan City plant. 7000 to 8199 from Oct. 1943 through March 1944 (lot 6704) and car numbers 8300 to 8499 and 9000 ti 9999 from Oct. 1945 through May 1946 (lot 6753).

Unfortunately there is no mention of the coupler but there are several photos of new cars and none of them show tightlock couplers, they all look like standard type E couplers.

Shucks, I was just on the 7407 a year or two ago in Bellevue, Ohio but neglected to get a photo of the car end (it was sandwiched between two other cars)

Dave, there was an AAR committee formed in 1936 to develop a tightlock coupler.

It became available as a type H coupler for passenger equipment in 1937 and was required on any passenger cars built after 1956. It had a 6½" x 8" shank and that may be why it wasn't used in the Troop Sleeper due to the necessary draft gear and required a heavier hanger assembly.

Good Luck, Ed

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Sunday, November 15, 2015 3:08 AM

Accounts indicate the cars were intended to minimize use of strategically critical materials. Since they were cutting corners on just about everything else, doesn't make a lot of sense that these cars would get Tightlocks. But that doesn't prove they didn't, either.

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Anaheim, CA Bayfield, CO
  • 1,829 posts
Posted by Southwest Chief on Sunday, November 15, 2015 12:38 PM

Thanks for the info thus far.  Oh and by tightlocks I'm referring to passenger train couplers.  Type H.  Not shelf couplers. 

Searching some more on Google found this car that sold.  Mentions "H" couplers.  But these could have been added later on.

"Some of the mechanical details include:  good body and roof, friction bearings, original Allied Full Cushion Trucks, H couplers, good interior"

Troop Sleeper

Matt from Anaheim, CA and Bayfield, CO
Click Here for my model train photo website

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 8,892 posts
Posted by riogrande5761 on Sunday, November 15, 2015 1:43 PM

Sure wish Walther would run more. They seem to be looooooong sold out.

Rio Grande.  The Action Road  - Focus 1977-1983

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Anaheim, CA Bayfield, CO
  • 1,829 posts
Posted by Southwest Chief on Sunday, November 15, 2015 1:47 PM

riogrande5761

Sure wish Walther would run more. They seem to be looooooong sold out.

 
That's for sure.  I got mine many years ago.

Matt from Anaheim, CA and Bayfield, CO
Click Here for my model train photo website

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Sunday, November 15, 2015 1:54 PM

Yup, me too.  I was going through my pile recently.  And I bought plenty of undecs (for doing various rebuilds) but didn't get enough of the "real" ones.  I could certainly use another 3-pack, at a minimum.

 

 

Ed

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,367 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Sunday, November 15, 2015 5:25 PM

Southwest Chief
Searching some more on Google found this car that sold.  Mentions "H" couplers.  But these could have been added later on.

I suppose when some of the railroads were converting these to other uses, M of W, express and mail storage they may have converted to type H couplers. This would probably involve new draft gear, too.

Here are two as built end photos I came across that show a type E coupler installed.

 

This site has some decent information but still, lacks any mention of coupler types.

http://www.prototypespecificproducts.com/military-cars/

You have to dig a little to find additional info on the site but it is interesting just the same.

Hope that helps, Ed

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Anaheim, CA Bayfield, CO
  • 1,829 posts
Posted by Southwest Chief on Sunday, November 15, 2015 10:12 PM

Thanks for finding those images Ed.

Matt from Anaheim, CA and Bayfield, CO
Click Here for my model train photo website

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,367 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Sunday, November 15, 2015 10:19 PM

Southwest Chief

Thanks for finding those images Ed.

 

Glad to help out an 'ol Trooper...

Ed

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Tuesday, November 17, 2015 11:19 AM
If anyone is on southwest Michigan there is one that is easily accesable on New Buffalo. Somebody needs to explain the duel air brake system to me because looking at it made no sense when I crawled under it.
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: Jersey City
  • 1,925 posts
Posted by steemtrayn on Tuesday, November 17, 2015 3:53 PM

 

On a car with a dual air brake system, there is a valve that senses whether or not the signal hose is live. If so, it sets up to operate at 110 psi for passenger service. If not, then 90 for freight. At least that's the way I understand it.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,367 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Tuesday, November 17, 2015 10:21 PM

To add a little more info from Steemtrayn's post...

From Trains To Victory by Donald Heimburger and John Kelly:

The cars were equipped with two AB-1-B type control valves, two air reservoirs, two type C slack adjusters and two UAH 10' x 12' brake cylinders operating each truck independently.

The Westinghouse AB-1-B brake equipment was a modification of the standard AB freight car brake system. It was designed for use on freight cars that operated in both freight and fast passenger service. This eliminated operation of the "controlled emergency" necessary for long freight train service and enabled the emergency rate of the brake cylinder application appropriate to passenger train operation.

Now I'm not quite sure what the authors are trying to explain with the "controlled emergency"? My understanding of the main difference of passenger and freight brakes back then, besides the brake pipe pressure that Dave mentioned, is that passenger control valves are set for graduated release and freight valves direct release.

Emergency rate was just that, emergency application as fast as possible using the emergency side of the air reservoir.

I remember having to switch over passenger cars that were going to be deadheaded in freight that had UC brake valves from graduated to direct by removing three bolts and rotating a plate, (I don't recall if the D22s had this feature, too) then bolting back. I imagine this would be pretty time consuming for troop movements that might see dual service operation very frequently in the course of a weeks time.

Neat Stuff, Ed

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • 266 posts
Posted by Ron High on Thursday, November 19, 2015 3:59 PM

At these web addresses are new Haven RR diagrams of both series of former troop cars converted as follows  Storage Mail Cars3600 to 3686 http://www.alphabetroute.com/nynhh/1955passdgms/3600-3686.pdf

And Baggage Cars 3700 to 3762

http://www.alphabetroute.com/nynhh/1955passdgms/3700-3762.pdf

 Both specify AAR type E couplers of course this as they were rebuilt /converted .I dont know if they came to the railroad with type E.

Ron High

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,367 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Friday, November 20, 2015 1:48 PM

Thanks, Ron

That's a great deal of information on that diagram. I'm going to bet that they were built, and later sold to the New Haven, with the type E couplers. 

Regards, Ed

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!