Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Question about the NYC Hudson streamlining

2899 views
7 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Utica, OH
  • 4,000 posts
Question about the NYC Hudson streamlining
Posted by jecorbett on Friday, August 21, 2015 6:04 PM

I recall reading many years ago that the streamlining for the Hudsons fell victim to the WWII demand for scrap metal so I assumed none were around in the postwar period. However I just read in the current edition of the Central Headlight, the historical society magazine, that 5344 kept her streamlining until October of 1945 when it lost its streamlining after being damaged in a grade crossing accident. It made me wonder if other Hudsons kept their streamlining into the postwar era. When was the last time a streamlined Hudson ran on the NYC system?

The reason I ask this is that my layout is a fictional subsidary of the NYC in the mid 1950s. I know I am stretching things by operating both a Dreyfus and 1941 Empire State Express streamliner on the layout but maybe I am not stretching things as much as I thought.

  • Member since
    August 2011
  • From: A Comfy Cave, New Zealand
  • 6,251 posts
Posted by "JaBear" on Saturday, August 22, 2015 5:25 AM
Gidday, unfortunately this site refers to the Dreyfuss streamlining being removed in 1945 and the “Empire State Express” streamlining being removed in 1950.
 This site also refers to the 1945 date.......
...and this PDF just has very Cool photos of NYC steam streamliners.
jecorbett
a fictional subsidary of the NYC
Sez it all for me.Smile, Wink & Grin
Cheers, the Bear.
 

"One difference between pessimists and optimists is that while pessimists are more often right, optimists have far more fun."

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Utica, OH
  • 4,000 posts
Posted by jecorbett on Saturday, August 22, 2015 8:00 AM

Thanks Bear. That's good information. The article I just read said that 5344 had received pre-Dreyfus streamlining in 1934 but I don't recall having seen a picture of it. I also didn't realize this was the first streamlined steamer.

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • 3,006 posts
Posted by ACY Tom on Saturday, August 22, 2015 8:22 AM

Some --- maybe all? --- received big PT tenders in later years.  That's another interesting detail you might want to consider.

Tom

  • Member since
    September 2006
  • 776 posts
Posted by wabash2800 on Saturday, August 22, 2015 9:22 AM

It is my understanding that the earliest version was called the "upside-down bath tub" and then you have the second version introduced in 1941? Incidentally, the recent issue of Classic Trains has some photos and a small story of the Empire State Express engine making its still born run on Pearl Harbor Day.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Utica, OH
  • 4,000 posts
Posted by jecorbett on Saturday, August 22, 2015 5:29 PM

You are correct that the bathtub design was the first streamlined Hudson appearing in 1934 but to the best of my knowledge, only 5344 received it. In 1938 Dreyfus created his first streamlined design which was given to 10 Hudsons to match the new lightweight 20th Century Limited cars. The 1941 Dreyfus design was for the stainless steel cars of the new Empire State Express which made its first revenue run on December 7, 1941. I'm guessing the PR department figured Sunday would be a good day for the innaugural run since it would be a slow newsday and they would get lots of press. OOPS!!! 

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • 3,006 posts
Posted by ACY Tom on Saturday, August 22, 2015 6:58 PM

Would it have helped if they'd consulted the Imperial Japanese Navy first? 

Just wondering.

Tom

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Sunday, August 23, 2015 1:31 AM

 5344 lost it's number and became the "Commodore Vanderbilt" in 1934, with the so-called "bathtub" streamlining. 

http://www.steamlocomotive.com/streamlined/scrapped/

The only other engine ever given that streamlining was the NYC Mohawk 4-8-2 that was leased to Rexall Drugs in 1936 for the "Rexall Train" cross-country promotional tour.

http://www.themetrains.com/rexall-train-main.htm

In 1939, 5344 got it's number back, and was re-streamlined in the 1938 20th Century Limited scheme (5344 was a J-1, all the previous 20th C. streamliners were J-3s).

As noted, some Hudsons were streamlined into the 1941 Empire State Express scheme. A few streamliners were still at least partially streamlined after WW2, but most that made it thru the war lost their streamlining soon after - not so much due to the steel being needed, but because of maintenance headaches. 

p.s. when Northern Pacific began it's plan to streamline the North Coast Limited after WW2, it at first considered streamlining some of their A class 4-8-4s into a style very similar to the Commodore Vanderbilt / Rexall Train style. They decided to go with EMD F-units instead, but it's interesting to picture two-tone green "bathtub" Northerns....

Stix

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!