Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Renumbering frenzy

1583 views
3 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Southern Quebec, Canada
  • 868 posts
Renumbering frenzy
Posted by Guy Papillon on Sunday, March 8, 2015 5:24 PM

After acquiring its first road switchers in the first half of the 50's, the Canadian National Railway renumbered many of them up to tree times in less than four years. Here is an example for a GP7:

 GP7, serial A-555 shipped from GMD 30 November 1953 as 7576; 

renumbered 1721 in September 1954

renumbered 4371 in June 1956

renumbered 4821 in August 1957

A locomotive being profitable when on the tracks, not in the paint shop, what was the need, or the purpose, of those repeated renumberings?

Guy

Modeling CNR in the 50's

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Canada, eh?
  • 13,375 posts
Posted by doctorwayne on Sunday, March 8, 2015 6:09 PM

Most likely to free-up number groupings for recently-acquired or soon-to-be-acquired locomotives.  Keep in mind, too, that the CNR still had active steam locomotives at this time, and they had already gone through re-numbering process.

Wayne

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,614 posts
Posted by dehusman on Monday, March 9, 2015 3:57 PM

They would repaint the number while it was in the shop for something else.  an engine wouldn't see a "paint shop" unless it was being completely rebuilt.

During the mergers in the 1990's, I know of engines that were renumbered more than once while they were still in the rebuild shop.  They were renumbered before they even got painted.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,426 posts
Posted by dknelson on Monday, March 9, 2015 5:14 PM

Employee timetables would set load and speed limits on engines by number class.  It may even be that pay scales were triggered by number class.  So it was important for the numbering system of an identical class of locomotives to make sense and not be scattershot.

Dave Nelson   

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!