Login
or
Register
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Home
»
Model Railroader
»
Forums
»
Layouts and layout building
»
Kato Unitrack minimum radius for N-gauge
Kato Unitrack minimum radius for N-gauge
15381 views
2 replies
Order Ascending
Order Descending
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Kato Unitrack minimum radius for N-gauge
Posted by
Anonymous
on Monday, September 1, 2003 10:09 AM
I was wondering if anyone has any experience with Kato Unitrack and what minimum radius is acceptable without causing problems. I purchased some samples to see first hand and the 13 3/4in appears to be acceptable. The size higher jumps to 30 or 15 degree and I was hoping to stay with 45. The track looks well constructed although a bit expensive. I like the hidden switch on the turnouts. Any info would be appreciated.....
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Kato Unitrack minimum radius for N-gauge
Posted by
Anonymous
on Monday, September 1, 2003 10:09 AM
I was wondering if anyone has any experience with Kato Unitrack and what minimum radius is acceptable without causing problems. I purchased some samples to see first hand and the 13 3/4in appears to be acceptable. The size higher jumps to 30 or 15 degree and I was hoping to stay with 45. The track looks well constructed although a bit expensive. I like the hidden switch on the turnouts. Any info would be appreciated.....
Reply
Edit
Jacktal
Member since
October 2002
From: City of Québec,Canada
1,258 posts
Posted by
Jacktal
on Monday, September 1, 2003 1:02 PM
It all depends on what you want to operate on your layout.I don't know about Unitrack but generally speaking,a four axle loco will do well on radiuses as small as 9 3/4(Atlas min. "N" rad.).If you're planning on using 6 axle locos for instance,many will negociate such a small radius but won't look very good at it.A 13 3/4 in. radius is definitely acceptable for most diesels but the longer units as SD-90s and such,as well as steamers,will look much better on even greater radius curves.
Reply
Jacktal
Member since
October 2002
From: City of Québec,Canada
1,258 posts
Posted by
Jacktal
on Monday, September 1, 2003 1:02 PM
It all depends on what you want to operate on your layout.I don't know about Unitrack but generally speaking,a four axle loco will do well on radiuses as small as 9 3/4(Atlas min. "N" rad.).If you're planning on using 6 axle locos for instance,many will negociate such a small radius but won't look very good at it.A 13 3/4 in. radius is definitely acceptable for most diesels but the longer units as SD-90s and such,as well as steamers,will look much better on even greater radius curves.
Reply
AltonFan
Member since
April 2003
From: US
1,522 posts
Posted by
AltonFan
on Tuesday, September 2, 2003 2:39 PM
I used the Kato Unitrack for a temporary "test track" layout for a few years. The track came from the K1, K2, and K3 sets. In general, I had no problem running most of my stuff on the 12 3/8" curves that came with the K1 set, but I later got some 15" radius curves. My Life-Like SD-7s ran fine, but the ConCor PA-1s were cramped, and made noise. A Bachmann 4-4-0
always
derailed on the Kato turnouts. (The turnouts need to be on a level base. They have problems if the subroadbed is warped.) For a quick, temporary set-up, I like the Kato track.
The number you need to watch is the curve radius, not the degrees. The degrees only tell you how much of a circle each curved section represents. (You will need 12 15-degree sections to make a half-circle, or 4 45-degree sections, or 6 30-degree sections, etc.)
Since I want to run full-length passenger cars, big steam, and ALCo PA-1s, I opt for the broadest curves I can get.
Also, beware that minimum radius may effect which Micro-Trains coupler conversions you use. Several kits require a longer-shank coupler for tighter curves.
Dan
Reply
AltonFan
Member since
April 2003
From: US
1,522 posts
Posted by
AltonFan
on Tuesday, September 2, 2003 2:39 PM
I used the Kato Unitrack for a temporary "test track" layout for a few years. The track came from the K1, K2, and K3 sets. In general, I had no problem running most of my stuff on the 12 3/8" curves that came with the K1 set, but I later got some 15" radius curves. My Life-Like SD-7s ran fine, but the ConCor PA-1s were cramped, and made noise. A Bachmann 4-4-0
always
derailed on the Kato turnouts. (The turnouts need to be on a level base. They have problems if the subroadbed is warped.) For a quick, temporary set-up, I like the Kato track.
The number you need to watch is the curve radius, not the degrees. The degrees only tell you how much of a circle each curved section represents. (You will need 12 15-degree sections to make a half-circle, or 4 45-degree sections, or 6 30-degree sections, etc.)
Since I want to run full-length passenger cars, big steam, and ALCo PA-1s, I opt for the broadest curves I can get.
Also, beware that minimum radius may effect which Micro-Trains coupler conversions you use. Several kits require a longer-shank coupler for tighter curves.
Dan
Reply
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Users Online
There are no community member online
Search the Community
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter
See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter
and get model railroad news in your inbox!
Sign up